scholarly journals Sensory conflict compared in microgravity, artificial gravity, motion sickness, and vestibular disorders

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (2,3) ◽  
pp. 81-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan E. Holly ◽  
Sarah M. Harmon
2008 ◽  
Vol 62 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 224-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Z. Elias ◽  
Thomas Jarchow ◽  
Laurence R. Young

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 1586-1591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Wang ◽  
Richard F. Lewis

Migraine is associated with enhanced motion sickness susceptibility and can cause episodic vertigo [vestibular migraine (VM)], but the mechanisms relating migraine to these vestibular symptoms remain uncertain. We tested the hypothesis that the central integration of rotational cues (from the semicircular canals) and gravitational cues (from the otolith organs) is abnormal in migraine patients. A postrotational tilt paradigm generated a conflict between canal cues (which indicate the head is rotating) and otolith cues (which indicate the head is tilted and stationary), and eye movements were measured to quantify two behaviors that are thought to minimize this conflict: suppression and reorientation of the central angular velocity signal, evidenced by attenuation (“dumping”) of the vestibuloocular reflex and shifting of the rotational axis of the vestibuloocular reflex toward the earth vertical. We found that normal and migraine subjects, but not VM patients, displayed an inverse correlation between the extent of dumping and the size of the axis shift such that the net “conflict resolution” mediated through these two mechanisms approached an optimal value and that the residual sensory conflict in VM patients (but not migraine or normal subjects) correlated with motion sickness susceptibility. Our findings suggest that the brain normally controls the dynamic and spatial characteristics of central vestibular signals to minimize intravestibular sensory conflict and that this process is disrupted in VM, which may be responsible for the enhance motion intolerance and episodic vertigo that characterize this disorder.


1982 ◽  
Vol 75 (11special) ◽  
pp. 2414-2418
Author(s):  
Masashi Kawano ◽  
Shigeaki Shirabe

2014 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 585-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louisa Murdin ◽  
Florence Chamberlain ◽  
Sanjay Cheema ◽  
Qadeer Arshad ◽  
Michael A Gresty ◽  
...  

Perception ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 521-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaziela Ishak ◽  
Andrea Bubka ◽  
Frederick Bonato

Sensory conflict theories of motion sickness (MS) assert that symptoms may result when incoming sensory inputs (e.g., visual and vestibular) contradict each other. Logic suggests that attenuating input from one sense may reduce conflict and hence lessen MS symptoms. In the current study, it was hypothesized that attenuating visual input by blocking light entering the eye would reduce MS symptoms in a motion provocative environment. Participants sat inside an aircraft cockpit mounted onto a motion platform that simultaneously pitched, rolled, and heaved in two conditions. In the occluded condition, participants wore “blackout” goggles and closed their eyes to block light. In the control condition, participants opened their eyes and had full view of the cockpit’s interior. Participants completed separate Simulator Sickness Questionnaires before and after each condition. The posttreatment total Simulator Sickness Questionnaires and subscores for nausea, oculomotor, and disorientation in the control condition were significantly higher than those in the occluded condition. These results suggest that under some conditions attenuating visual input may delay the onset of MS or weaken the severity of symptoms. Eliminating visual input may reduce visual/nonvisual sensory conflict by weakening the influence of the visual channel, which is consistent with the sensory conflict theory of MS.


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 333-346
Author(s):  
Jan E. Holly

Artificial gravity by centrifugation can lead to perceptual disturbances in the form of motion sickness and/or misperception of motion during head movements, but the degree of perceptual disturbance during centrifugation in 0-g has not been thoroughly investigated. It is known that during whole-body on-axis yaw rotation in 0-g, head movements in pitch and roll cause very little disturbance, despite significant disturbance in 1-g. Therefore, 1-g experimental results do not apply directly to 0-g without further analysis. A modeling approach was used here to predict disorienting effects in 0-g and 1-g environments, with different rotation speeds, centrifuge radii, and directions of head movement. The results were based upon investigation of the stimulus itself, in the form of angular and linear accelerations, and their consequences due to linear-angular interactions in three dimensions. The results explain known differences in 0-g and 1-g, for head turns toward and away from the direction of motion, and for head movements on- and off-axis. Additional predictions include an increase in perceptual disturbance with the magnitude of the gravito-inertial acceleration (GIA), therefore an increase off-axis, but a decrease in 0-g. Also predicted is that head-movement direction makes a difference, with rotation outward relative to the centrifuge axis causing the least disturbance.


1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 294-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles M. Oman

"Motion sickness" is the general term describing a group of common nausea syndromes originally attributed to motion-induced cerebral ischemia, stimulation of abdominal organ afferents, or overstimulation of the vestibular organs of the inner ear. Seasickness, car sickness, and airsickness are commonly experienced examples. However, the identification of other variants such as spectacle sickness and flight simulator sickness in which the physical motion of the head and body is normal or even absent has led to a succession of "sensory conflict" theories that offer a more comprehensive etiologic perspective. Implicit in the conflict theory is the hypothesis that neural and (or) humoral signals originate in regions of the brain subserving spatial orientation, and that these signals somehow traverse to other centers mediating sickness symptoms. Unfortunately, our present understanding of the neurophysiological basis of motion sickness is incomplete. No sensory conflict neuron or process has yet been physiologically identified. This paper reviews the types of stimuli that cause sickness and synthesizes a mathematical statement of the sensory conflict hypothesis based on observer theory from control engineering. A revised mathematical model is presented that describes the dynamic coupling between the putative conflict signals and nausea magnitude estimates. Based on the model, what properties would a conflict neuron be expected to have?Key words: motion sickness, nausea, vestibular, vision, mathematical models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document