End Procedure Action Item

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 319-319
Author(s):  
B Gaines ◽  
P Xu ◽  
A Burns ◽  
E Shea ◽  
C Coyle ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 283-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Carroll

Collaboration is a frequently cited concept and also cited as a call-to-action item required among team members to improve the status of healthcare for persons and communities. With a humanbecoming paradigmatic lens, freedom is established to elevate the idea that community provides an essential component upon which collaboration can be built. Community is conceptualized as oneness of humanuniverse and is highlighted as an artful aspect of providing care to persons by keeping in the forefront the three humanbecoming change concepts of moving-initiating, anchoring-shifting, and pondering-shaping.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 585-591
Author(s):  
R. Brent Stansfield ◽  
Tsveti Markova ◽  
Richard Baker

ABSTRACT Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Next Accreditation System requires continuous program improvement as part of program evaluation for residency training institutions and programs. Objective To improve the institutional- and program-level evaluation processes, to operationalize a culture of continuous quality improvement (CQI), and to increase the quality and achievement of action items, the Wayne State University Office of Graduate Medical Education (WSU GME) incorporated CQI elements into its program evaluation process. Methods Across 4 academic years, WSU GME phased the following 4 CQI elements into the evaluation process at the program and institutional levels, including the annual program evaluation (APE) and the annual institutional review: (1) An APE template; (2) SMART (specific, measurable, accountable, realistic, timely) format for program and institutional goals; (3) Dashboard program and institutional metrics; and (4) Plan-do-study-act cycles for each action item. Results Action item goals improved in adherence to the SMART format. In 2014, 38% (18 of 48) omitted at least 1 field, compared with 0% omitting any fields in 2018. More complete action items took less time to resolve: 1.7 years compared with 2.4 years (t(43.3) = 2.87, P = .003). The implementation of CQI in the APE was well received by program leadership. Conclusions After leveraging CQI methods, both descriptions of institutional- and program-level goals and the time required for their achievement improved, with overall program director and program coordinator satisfaction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document