scholarly journals Handbook of Florida Fence and Property Law: Adverse Possession

EDIS ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Olexa ◽  
Joshua A. Cossey

Revised! Circular 1242, by Michael T. Olexa and Joshua A. Cossey, provides a basic overview of many rights and responsibilities that farmers and landowners have under Florida's fencing and property law. Published by the UF Department of Food and Resource Economics, December 2006. Ask IFAS: Florida Fence and Property Law handbook (ufl.edu)

2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa Katz

On what grounds can we justify the transformation of squatters into owners? To understand the moral significance of adverse possession, the author proposes an analogy. Much of the moral analysis of adverse possession has proceeded on the basis that adverse possessors are land thieves. The author first explains why the analogy of adverse possessor to land thief is misleading. Then, she argues that there is a much closer analogy between adverse possession and revolution or, more precisely, a bloodless coup d’état. The recognition of the adverse possessor’s (private) authority solves the moral problem created by an agendaless object just as the recognition of the existing government’s (public) authority, whatever its origin, solves the moral problem of a stateless people. The morality of adverse possession, seen this way, does not turn on any particularized evaluation of the squatter’s deserts or her uses of the land. The author thus does not propose that adverse possession is justified in the same way that some argue a conscientious revolutionary is justified in resisting an oppressive or otherwise unjust sovereign. Rather, the morality of adverse possession is found where we might least expect it: in its positivist strategy of ratifying the claims to authority of a squatter without regard to the substantive merits of her agenda or her personal virtue.


EDIS ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Olexa ◽  
Joshua A. Cossey

Revised! Circular 1242, by Michael T. Olexa and Joshua A. Cossey, provides a basic overview of many rights and responsibilities that farmers and landowners have under Florida's fencing and property law. Published by the UF Department of Food and Resource Economics, December 2006. FE677/FE677: Handbook of Florida Fence and Property Law: Table of Contents (ufl.edu) Ask IFAS: Florida Fence and Property Law handbook (ufl.edu)


1992 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 1291
Author(s):  
Sandra Petersson

This paper is the winner of this year's William Morrow Essay competition. It traces the origin and evolution of the law of adverse possession. Petersson commences with a thorough overview of the current status of adverse possession in Canada. The reader is then transported back in time to medieval England to bear witness as historical forces forge the law into twin principles of extinction and acquisition. From the regal court of Henry II, the reader is then whisked to the humble offices of the Registrar of Land Titles as the paper guides one through modern property law relating to adverse possession. The journey ends with an enlightening discussion of the justifications for, and future of, adverse possession in Alberta.


2020 ◽  
pp. 545-581
Author(s):  
Emma Lees

This chapter reflects on the interaction between property law and human rights law. Property law and human rights can interact in a number of different ways. The major division distinguishes those cases where human rights arguments are made to ‘bolster’ an existing property law-based argument, and those where the human rights argument is made to attempt to limit the scope of a property right. Thus, one can see the rules of property law and human rights working together, or they can be in conflict. The chapter first identifies the sources of human rights in English law, and then considers which rights are particularly important in relation to property law. It also looks at the mechanics by which key human rights interact with property law, and examines the question of horizontal effect in that context. Finally, the chapter addresses how human rights arguments have had influence in particular areas of land law, focusing on adverse possession, leases, actions for possession against trespassers, and mortgages.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-63
Author(s):  
John Lovett

Property law scholars in the United States have discussed the doctrine of adverse possession for more than a century. Indeed, ever since American property law scholars began to write property law treatises, formalize property law courses in modern law schools, publish property specific articles in law reviews, and publish property law case books, adverse possession has served as a staple of property law discourse. This Article examines how property law scholars think about and discuss adverse possession. It explores how adverse possession talk has changed—and not changed—over time. In other words, this Article examines both the substance and rhetoric of property law scholars’ attempts to explain, appraise and, at times, reform the doctrine of adverse possession.


EDIS ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Olexa ◽  
Joshua A. Cossey

Revised! Circular 1242, by Michael T. Olexa and Joshua A. Cossey, provides a basic overview of many rights and responsibilities that farmers and landowners have under Florida's fencing and property law. Published by the UF Department of Food and Resource Economics, December 2006. FE679/FE679: Handbook of Florida Fence and Property Law: Eminent Domain (ufl.edu) Ask IFAS: Florida Fence and Property Law handbook (ufl.edu)


Author(s):  
Mark J. Davison ◽  
Ann L. Monotti ◽  
Leanne Wiseman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document