scholarly journals Managing your risk: Weather and climate impacts on crop insurance. Fact sheet for the Northern Plains Climate Hub region.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Reyes ◽  
Emile Elias ◽  
Andrew Eischens ◽  
Mark Shilts

A fact sheet produced by the USDA Southwest Climate Hub using publicly available crop insurance data from the USDA Risk Management Agency for Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Colorado, and Nebraska.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Reyes ◽  
Emile Elias ◽  
Andrew Eischens ◽  
Mark Shilts

A fact sheet produced by the USDA Southwest Climate Hub using publicly available crop insurance data from the USDA Risk Management Agency for Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Reyes ◽  
Emile Elias ◽  
Andrew Eischens ◽  
Mark Shilts

A fact sheet produced by the USDA Southwest Climate Hub using publicly available crop insurance data from the USDA Risk Management Agency for the United States.


1953 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
James H. Howard

Recently renewed interest has been focused upon the occurrence in the Plains area of the archaeological complex often termed the “Southern cult.” This complex is found over a wide geographic area and in association with varied cultures. It occurs throughout the southeastern United States, and extends north and west along the Mississippi and Missouri River valleys. It has been found in eastern South Dakota, eastern North Dakota, and in the provinces of Manitoba and Saskatchewan in Canada. The complex is characterized by specific art motifs and ceremonial objects, including masklike whelk shell gorgets, and the cross, forkedeye, and hand-and-eye motifs. The complex was apparently fundamentally dependent upon a horticultural base, and is associated in nearly every case with platform mounds. Sites often thought of in connection with the Southern cult are Etowah (Georgia), Moundville (Alabama), and Spiro (Oklahoma). The author has recently examined materials in the collections of the North Dakota State Historical Museum for artifacts related to the complex.


2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Octavio A. Ramirez ◽  
Carlos E. Carpio ◽  
Roderick M. Rejesus

This paper develops and applies a methodology to assess the accuracy of historical loss-cost rating procedures, similar to those used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Risk Management Agency (RMA), versus alternative parametric premium estimation methods. It finds that the accuracy of loss-cost procedures leaves much to be desired, but can be markedly improved through the use of alternative methods and increased farm-level yield sample sizes. Evidence suggests that the high degree of inaccuracy in crop insurance premium estimations through historical loss-cost procedures identified in the paper might be a major factor behind the need for substantial government subsidies to keep the program solvent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document