scholarly journals Vorteile von Compliance und Risikomanagement

2021 ◽  
pp. 123-147
Author(s):  
Lilian Reis da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ◽  
Richard Nixon ◽  
Enterprise Governance ◽  
Governance Risk

Compliance ist ein Programm, das darauf abzielt, Unternehmen vor Finanzbetrug, Korruption, unangemessenem Verhalten und/oder Verhalten von mit ihnen verbundenen Mitarbeitern zu schützen, um zu verhindern, dass ihr guter Ruf und ihre Finanzkraft untergraben werden. Es ist ein Werkzeug, dessen Zweck es ist, Regeln, Standards und Richtlinien für interne Prozesse innerhalb von Organisationen festzulegen. Es wurde 1970 in den Vereinigten Staaten entwickelt und seine Praxis wurde durch die Verabschiedung des FCPA (Foreign Corrupt Practices Act) Pioneer Law in ein Rechtsinstitut umgewandelt, das durch den Watergate-Fall motiviert war, an dem der damalige Präsident Richard Nixon und Mitglieder beteiligt waren seiner Regierung durch die Zahlung von Bestechungsgeldern in der Forschung zugunsten seiner Wiederwahl. In diesem Zusammenhang ist die Leitfrage dieses Artikels: Wie wirken die Vorteile des Compliance– und Risikomanagement-Programms zusammen, um die Risiken von Betrug, illegalen Handlungen und Korruption innerhalb von Organisationen zu reduzieren? Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Vorteile der Einführung des Compliance– und Risikomanagementprogramms in öffentlichen und privaten Unternehmen, in ihren internen Prozessen und in ihren Beziehungen zu ihrem Tätigkeitsbereich darzustellen und ihre Zusammenarbeit bei der Betrugsbekämpfung aufzuzeigen. Die bibliografische Recherche wurde als Methodik verwendet, um die Vorteile von Betrugspräventionsprogrammen zu diskutieren. Es wurde festgestellt, dass die Compliance– und Risikomanagementprogramme zusammen mit neuen Governance-Lösungen für die Informationstechnologie (IT) wie Enterprise Governance, Risk Management and Compliance (EGRC) wirksame Vorteile beim Risikoschutz bieten, Betrug und Korruption eindämmen.

scholarly journals Benefícios do Compliance e da gestão de riscos

2021 ◽  
pp. 123-147
Author(s):  
Lilian Reis da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ◽  
Richard Nixon ◽  
Enterprise Governance ◽  
Governance Risk

O Compliance é um programa que visa proteger as organizações da ocorrência de fraudes financeiras, corrupção, comportamentos e/ou condutas inadequadas de empregados a elas vinculados, evitando que sua boa reputação e solidez financeira sejam abaladas. Trata-se de uma ferramenta cuja finalidade é instituir regras, normas e diretrizes para os processos internos dentro das organizações. Foi desenvolvida nos Estados Unidos em 1970, tendo suas práticas transformadas em instituto legal, mediante a promulgação da Lei Pioneira de Combate à Corrupção FCPA (Foreign Corrupt Practices Act), motivada pelo Caso Watergate, que envolveu o então presidente Richard Nixon e membros de seu governo, mediante o pagamento de propinas em pesquisas a favor de sua reeleição. Neste contexto, o presente artigo, tem como questão norteadora: como os benefícios oferecidos pelo programa de Compliance e Gestão de Riscos colaboram para reduzir os riscos de fraudes, ilícitos e corrupção dentro de organizações? O objetivo deste estudo foi apresentar os benefícios proporcionados pela adoção do programa de Compliance e Gestão de Riscos em empresas públicas e privadas, em seus processos internos e relações com seu segmento de atuação, e como colaboram para a mitigação de fraudes. Foi adotada como metodologia a pesquisa bibliográfica, discorreu sobre os benefícios ocasionados por programas de prevenção de fraudes. Verificou-se que os programas de compliance e gestão de riscos trazem efetivos benefícios de proteção de riscos, mitigando fraudes e corrupção, aliados às novas soluções de Governança em Tecnologia da Informação (TI), como o Enterprise Governance, Risk Management and Compliance (EGRC).

scholarly journals Beneficios del cumplimiento y gestión de riesgos

2021 ◽  
pp. 123-147
Author(s):  
Lilian Reis da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ◽  
Richard Nixon ◽  
Enterprise Governance ◽  
Governance Risk

El cumplimiento es un programa que tiene como objetivo proteger a las organizaciones de la ocurrencia de fraude financiero, corrupción, comportamiento inapropiado y/o conducta de los empleados vinculados a ellas, evitando que su buena reputación y solidez financiera se vea socavada. Es una herramienta cuyo propósito es establecer reglas, estándares y lineamientos para los procesos internos dentro de las organizaciones. Fue desarrollado en los Estados Unidos en 1970, y sus prácticas se transformaron en un instituto legal, a través de la promulgación de la Ley Pionera FCPA (Foreign Corrupt Practices Act), motivada por el caso Watergate, que involucró al entonces presidente Richard Nixon y miembros de su gobierno, mediante el pago de sobornos en investigaciones a favor de su reelección. En este contexto, este artículo tiene como pregunta orientadora: ¿cómo colaboran los beneficios que ofrece el programa de Cumplimiento y Gestión de Riesgos para reducir los riesgos de fraude, actos ilícitos y corrupción dentro de las organizaciones? El objetivo de este estudio fue presentar los beneficios que brinda la adopción del programa de Cumplimiento y Gestión de Riesgos en empresas públicas y privadas, en sus procesos internos y relaciones con su segmento de actividad, y cómo colaboran para mitigar el fraude. Se adoptó como metodología la investigación bibliográfica, discutiendo los beneficios que generan los programas de prevención del fraude. Se descubrió que los programas de cumplimiento y gestión de riesgos brindan beneficios efectivos en la protección de riesgos, mitigando el fraude y la corrupción, junto con nuevas soluciones de gobernanza de Tecnología de la Información (TI), como la Enterprise Governance, Risk Management and Compliance (EGRC).

scholarly journals Avantages de la conformité et de la gestion des risques

2021 ◽  
pp. 123-147
Author(s):  
Lilian Reis da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ◽  
Richard Nixon ◽  
Gestion Des Risques ◽  
Protection Contre ◽  
Enterprise Governance ◽  
Governance Risk

La conformité est un programme qui vise à protéger les organisations contre la fraude financière, la corruption, le comportement et/ou l’inconduite des employés qui leur sont liés, empêchant ainsi leur bonne réputation et leur solidité financière d’être ébranlées. Il s’agit d’un outil dont le but est d’établir des règles, des normes et des lignes directrices pour les processus internes au sein des organisations. Il a été développé aux États-Unis en 1970, et ses pratiques ont été transformées en un institut juridique, grâce à la promulgation de la loi pionnière contre la corruption FCPA (Foreign Corrupt Practices Act), motivée par l’affaire du Watergate, qui impliquait le président de l’époque, Richard Nixon, et des membres de son administration, en payant des pots-de-vin dans des enquêtes en faveur de sa réélection. Dans ce contexte, cet article a pour question principale: comment les avantages offerts par le programme de conformité et de gestion des risques collaborent-ils pour réduire les risques de fraude, d’illicite et de corruption au sein des organisations ? L’objectif de cette étude était de présenter les avantages offerts par l’adoption du programme de conformité et de gestion des risques dans les entreprises publiques et privées, dans leurs processus internes et leurs relations avec leur secteur d’activité, et comment elles collaborent pour atténuer la fraude. La méthodologie a été adoptée comme une recherche bibliographique, et il s’agissait des avantages causés par les programmes de prévention de la fraude. Il a été constaté que les programmes de conformité et de gestion des risques apportent des avantages efficaces en matière de protection contre les risques, atténuant la fraude et la corruption, combinés à de nouvelles solutions de gouvernance des Technologies de l’Information (TI), telles que la Enterprise Governance, Risk Management and Compliance (EGRC).

scholarly journals Преимущества комплаенс и управление рисками

2021 ◽  
pp. 123-147
Author(s):  
Lilian Reis da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ◽  
Enterprise Governance ◽  
Governance Risk

Комплаенс – это программа, которая направлена на защиту организаций от возникновения финансового мошенничества, коррупции, поведения и / или неправомерного поведения сотрудников, связанных с ними, предотвращая их хорошую репутацию и финансовую устойчивость от пошатнуться. Это инструмент, целью которого является установление правил, стандартов и руководящих принципов для внутренних процессов в организациях. Он был разработан в Соединенных Штатах в 1970 году, и его практика была преобразована в юридический институт путем принятия Закона о пионерах против коррупции FCPA (Foreign Corrupt Practices Act), мотивированного Уотергейтским делом, в котором участвовали тогдашний президент Ричард Никсон и члены его администрации, путем выплаты взяток в опросах в пользу его переизбрания. В этом контексте в этой статье в качестве основного вопроса: как преимущества, предлагаемые программой комплаенс и управление рисками, сотрудничают для снижения рисков мошенничества, незаконности и коррупции в организациях? Цель этого исследования состояла в том, чтобы представить преимущества, предоставляемые принятием программы комплаенс и управления рисками в государственных и частных компаниях, в их внутренних процессах и отношениях с их сегментом деятельности, а также в том, как они сотрудничают для смягчения мошенничества. Методология была принята в качестве библиографического исследования, и речь шла о преимуществах, вызванных программами предотвращения мошенничества. Было обнаружено, что программы комплаенс и управления рисками приносят эффективные преимущества защиты от рисков, снижения мошенничества и коррупции вместе с новыми решениями для управления информационными технологиями (ИТ), такими как корпоративное управление, Enterprise Governance, Risk Management and Compliance (EGRC).

Praktisches Vorgehen in der interdisziplinären Institutionenanalyse. Ein Kompaktleitfaden

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kilian Bizer ◽  
Martin Führ
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Governance Risk

Dieser Leitfaden beschreibt in kompakter Form, wie eine „interdisziplinäre Institutionenanalyse“ praktisch anzulegen ist: Welche Analyse- und Prüfungsschritte sind zu durchlaufen? Um welche Fragen geht es jeweils und welche Rolle spielen empirische Befunde dabei? Die Darstellung orientiert sich an der Aufgabenstellung, vor der der Gesetzgeber im Rahmen einer Gesetzesfolgenabschätzung (wie sie etwa in § 44 der Gemeinsamen Geschäftsordnung der Bundesministerien oder in den Leitlinien der Europäischen Kommission vorgeschrieben ist) steht. Die Analyse- und Prüfungsschritte sind in gleicher Weise aber auch nutzbar, wenn es um Gestaltungsprobleme in Unternehmen (etwa Fortschreibung der Rahmenbedingungen im Kontext von „Governance, Risk Management, Compliance“ – GRC), Kammern und anderen Vereinigungen sowie in Behörden geht. Am Ende des Kompaktleitfadens erläutert ein Glossar Schlüsselbegriffe der Institutionenanalyse. Dort finden sich auch „Lesetipps“ zu weiterführender Literatur.

scholarly journals Corporate Governance, Risk Management, and Bank Performance: Does Type of Ownership Matter?

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 342-366
Author(s):  
Shayan Khan Kakar ◽  
Javed Ali ◽  
Muhammad Bilal ◽  
Yasmeen Tahira ◽  
Muhammad Tahir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Bank Performance ◽  
Governance Risk

scholarly journals Quality of Corporate Governance Risk Management in Dealing with Unanticipated Events: Evidence from Pakistan

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Rubeena Tashfeen ◽  
Saud Hayat ◽  
Afreen Mallik
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Governance Structure ◽  
Governance Structures ◽  
Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Market Dynamic ◽  
Average Abnormal Return ◽  
The Face ◽  
Governance Risk

This study examines the effectiveness of the corporate governance structure when coping with any potentially unexpected events. For the purpose of this research, an event study has been conducted in order to investigate the market responses of various firms through the Cumulative Average Abnormal Return (CAAR) of the stocks listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). The stocks data under consideration is that which was presented after the assassination of Benazir Bhutto in 2007. The overall results indicate that firms that are governed conventionally do not perform well in the markets during a crisis situation. In our comparison of conventionally, and non-conventionally governed firms, the overall pooled results show that the former record a lower CAAR. This, in short, indicates that conventional corporate governance structures may not be equipped to take timely and dynamic actions that are deemed necessary in the face of a crisis. Moreover, our results suggest that firms which have less diversified ownership, and governance mechanisms are less vulnerable to such unanticipated events. There are two reasons that support our hypotheses: first, strict governance mechanisms, and a resultant cautious/conservative approach may not allow firms to take timely and proactive decisions during these situations and second, there is a lower chance of existing agency problems, as family owners would be working for the protection of their own wealth during these events. Therefore, our findings ultimately reveal that the conventional corporate governance structures that work during normal time period, may become ineffective during a crisis. This study, aims to fill a gap in the literature in order to provide fresh insights into the stock market dynamic, and corporate governance risk management. Furthermore, it also highlights the benefits of family owned structures, and unconventional corporate governance systems, that may outperform conventional governance structure in some situations. This, however, raises the question whether one governance framework could be the correct fit in all the situations.

The New Technocracy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Esmark
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Performance Management ◽  
Network Governance ◽  
Political Elites ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
Clear Sign ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Post Industrial ◽  
Governance Risk

Setting a new benchmark for studies of technocracy, the book shows that a solution to the challenge of populism will depend as much on a technocratic retreat as democratic innovation. Esmark examines the development since the 1980s of a new 'post-industrial' technocratic regime and its complicity in the populist backlash against politics and political elites that is visible today. The new technocracy – a combination of network governance, risk management and performance management – has, the author argues, abandoned the overtly anti-democratic sentiments of its industrial predecessor and proclaimed a new partnership with democracy. The rise of populism, however, is a clear sign that the inherent problems of this partnership have been exposed and that technocracy posing as democracy will only serve to exacerbate existing problems.

Internal Control Frameworks and Its Relation with Governance and Risk Management: An Analytical Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahammed Adil Mohammed ◽  
Thamer Kadhim Al-Abedi ◽  
Hakeem Hammood Flayyih ◽  
Hussein Ali Mohaisen
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Analytical Study ◽  
Effective Management ◽  
Management Framework ◽  
Risk Management Framework ◽  
Control Framework ◽  
The Subject ◽  
And Control ◽  
Governance Risk

This study aims at searching in different editions of internal control frameworks and its relation with governance and risk management by dividing the study into three themes. The first one includes studying each framework in terms of the concept of internal control, elements and goals and what makes it different form the latter. The second concerns the relation of internal control with governance and the importance of what it provides to economic unity. The third one and the last regards the relation of internal control to risk management framework and what economic unity will achieve if it managed its risks properly through presenting a number of academic studies that dealt with the subject of the study. The design of this paper depends on reviewing literature during the period (2012-2019) and analyzing results concluded by these literatures concerning the study of internal control framework and its relation with governance and risk management. The study concluded that economic unity cannot achieve its goals and maintain success without an effective management of risks, control and governance. Board of directors and administration both need each other to apply governance, risk management and control effectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document