scholarly journals Taxonomy of affective curriculum for gifted learners: A framework for providing social–emotional learning to gifted children

2020 ◽  
pp. 66-69
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Cavilla

There is a growing demand for equal support of social–emotional learning across the globe. In the United States, the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning has shed significant light on the power of affective development for school-aged children, indicating that, without it, students are limited in their ability to reach their full potential. Cavilla’s Taxonomy of Affective Curriculum for Gifted Learners was developed to provide a framework that reduces the disparity in focus between cognitive and social–emotional development for a population that requires affective support in response to the effects of asynchronous development as well as an inherent proclivity for heightened capacity for emotional intelligence and moral development. The taxonomy leads gifted learners, whose identification and supporting services result from their display of academic aptitude within the top 10% of their peers or performing two standard deviations above the mean, or higher, on a personal intelligence test as defined by the National Association for Gifted Children toward their full potential through the eventual development of specific social–emotional abilities, such as harmonious passion, acceptance of ambiguity, willingness to view failure as opportunity for growth, and an increased ability to set and attain meaningful goals.


2021 ◽  
pp. 153450842098452
Author(s):  
Christopher L. Thomas ◽  
Staci M. Zolkoski ◽  
Sarah M. Sass

Educators and educational support staff are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of systematic efforts to support students’ social and emotional growth. Logically, the success of social-emotional learning programs depends upon the ability of educators to assess student’s ability to process and utilize social-emotional information and use data to guide programmatic revisions. Therefore, the purpose of the current examination was to provide evidence of the structural validity of the Social-Emotional Learning Scale (SELS), a freely available measure of social-emotional learning, within Grades 6 to 12. Students ( N = 289, 48% female, 43.35% male, 61% Caucasian) completed the SELS and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analyses of the SELS failed to support a multidimensional factor structure identified in prior investigations. The results of an exploratory factor analysis suggest a reduced 16-item version of the SELS captures a unidimensional social-emotional construct. Furthermore, our results provide evidence of the internal consistency and concurrent validity of the reduced-length version of the instrument. Our discussion highlights the implications of the findings to social and emotional learning educational efforts and promoting evidence-based practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document