scholarly journals Nonlinear seismic response of reinforced concrete pedestals in elevated water tanks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Razmyar Ghateh

Elevated water tanks are employed in water distribution facilities in order to provide storage and necessary pressure in water network systems. These structures have demonstrated poor seismic performance in the past earthquakes. In this study, a finite element method is employed for investigating the nonlinear seismic response of reinforced concrete (RC) pedestal in elevated water tanks. A combination of the most commonly constructed tank sizes and pedestal heights in industry are developed and investigated. Pushover analysis is performed in order to construct the pushover curves, establish the overstrength and ductility factor, and evaluate the effect of various parameters such as fundamental period and tank size on the seismic response factors of elevated water tanks. Furthermore, a probabilistic method is implemented to verify the seismic performance and response modification factor of elevated water tanks. The effect of wall openings in the seismic response characteristics of elevated water tanks is investigated as well. Finally, the effect of axial compression on shear strength of RC pedestals is evaluated and compared to nominal shear strength from current guideline and standards. The results of the study show that the tank size, pedestal height, fundamental period, and pedestal height to diameter ratio, could significantly affect the overstrength and ductility factor of RC pedestals. The nonlinear dynamic analysis results reveal that under the maximum considered earthquake (MCE) intensity, light and medium size tank models do not experience significant damages. However, heavy tank size models experience more damage in comparison with light and medium tank sizes. This study shows that the current code response modification factor values are appropriate for light and medium tank sizes; however they need to be modified for heavy tank sizes. The results of this study also reveal that if the pedestal wall openings are designed based on current design guidelines, then nearly identical nonlinear seismic response behaviour is expected from the pedestals with and without openings. Finally, it is shown that the pedestal maximum shear strength calculated by finite element method for the full tank state is higher than the nominal shear strength determined based on the current design guidelines compared to the nominal shear strength from current guideline and standards.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Razmyar Ghateh

Elevated water tanks are employed in water distribution facilities in order to provide storage and necessary pressure in water network systems. These structures have demonstrated poor seismic performance in the past earthquakes. In this study, a finite element method is employed for investigating the nonlinear seismic response of reinforced concrete (RC) pedestal in elevated water tanks. A combination of the most commonly constructed tank sizes and pedestal heights in industry are developed and investigated. Pushover analysis is performed in order to construct the pushover curves, establish the overstrength and ductility factor, and evaluate the effect of various parameters such as fundamental period and tank size on the seismic response factors of elevated water tanks. Furthermore, a probabilistic method is implemented to verify the seismic performance and response modification factor of elevated water tanks. The effect of wall openings in the seismic response characteristics of elevated water tanks is investigated as well. Finally, the effect of axial compression on shear strength of RC pedestals is evaluated and compared to nominal shear strength from current guideline and standards. The results of the study show that the tank size, pedestal height, fundamental period, and pedestal height to diameter ratio, could significantly affect the overstrength and ductility factor of RC pedestals. The nonlinear dynamic analysis results reveal that under the maximum considered earthquake (MCE) intensity, light and medium size tank models do not experience significant damages. However, heavy tank size models experience more damage in comparison with light and medium tank sizes. This study shows that the current code response modification factor values are appropriate for light and medium tank sizes; however they need to be modified for heavy tank sizes. The results of this study also reveal that if the pedestal wall openings are designed based on current design guidelines, then nearly identical nonlinear seismic response behaviour is expected from the pedestals with and without openings. Finally, it is shown that the pedestal maximum shear strength calculated by finite element method for the full tank state is higher than the nominal shear strength determined based on the current design guidelines compared to the nominal shear strength from current guideline and standards.


2015 ◽  
Vol 87 ◽  
pp. 32-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Ghateh ◽  
M.R. Kianoush ◽  
W. Pogorzelski

2014 ◽  
Vol 567 ◽  
pp. 469-475
Author(s):  
Hor Yin ◽  
Teo Wee

This paper presents the analytical optimised truss model based on the principle of the minimum total strain energy theorem. The model was validated against 90 experimental data collected from the literature. The predicted shear strength in the analysis showed a very satisfactory correlation with the test results, with the average experimental/analytical failure load ratio of 1.09 and the coefficient of variation (C.O.V) of 14.1%. Furthermore, a comparison between the accuracy of the proposed model and the current design guidelines was also demonstrated in this study. It was observed that the optimised truss model led to be more viable than the standard 45-deg truss model in the design guidelines. A large dispersion of the results was found in ACI 440 with the C.O.V as far as 31.4%; whilst the TR 55 and fib 14 showed no significant difference with the C.O.V of 29.3% and 21.5%, respectively.


2019 ◽  
Vol 181 ◽  
pp. 427-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Aliakbari ◽  
Hashem Shariatmadar

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1923363
Author(s):  
Manar M. Hussein ◽  
Manar Gamal ◽  
Walid A. Attia

1999 ◽  
Vol 125 (9) ◽  
pp. 965-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry W. Shenton ◽  
Francis P. Hampton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document