scholarly journals Evaluation of Modified Fish-Bone Model for Estimating Seismic Demands of Irregular MRF Structures

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin Haghighat ◽  
Ashkan Sharifi
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motions ◽  
Fish Bone ◽  
Seismic Demands ◽  
Error Measure ◽  
Ductility Demand ◽  
Earthquake Records ◽  
Moment Resisting Frame ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Story Drift ◽  
Moment Resisting

This paper evaluates the accuracy of the Modified Fish-Bone (MFB) model for estimating the maximum inter-story drift ratio of irregular moment resisting frame (MRF) structures. To make this model applicable to irregular MRF structures, some modifications are made to the MFB formula. In order to evaluate the accuracy of the MFB model, several irregular frames with different types of irregularities are considered when subjected to different ground motions with different intensities. A local and a global error measure are defined and they are calculated for different frame models subjected to different earthquake records. The effects of different irregularities, ductility demand and frame height on the accuracy of the MFB model are investigated. Based on the results obtained from this evaluation, two simple and effective approaches are suggested to improve the MFB models.

Evaluation of the MPA Procedure for Estimating Seismic Demands: RC-SMRF Buildings

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 827-845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Bobadilla ◽  
Anil K. Chopra
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motions ◽  
Pushover Analysis ◽  
Cyclic Behavior ◽  
Hysteretic Model ◽  
Practical Application ◽  
Seismic Demands ◽  
Modal Pushover Analysis ◽  
Moment Resisting Frame ◽  
Moment Resisting ◽  
Special Moment Resisting Frame

The modal pushover analysis (MPA) procedure is extended for analysis of reinforced concrete special moment resisting frame (RC-SMRF) buildings, after demonstrating that the theory, assumptions, and approximations underlying this procedure are valid for such systems. The principal extension of the procedure is in the hysteretic model for modal SDF systems, chosen as the peak-oriented model to represent the global monotonic and cyclic behavior of such buildings, characterized by deterioration of stiffness and strength under cyclic deformation. The median seismic demands for 4-, 8-, 12-, and 20-story RC-SMRF buildings—designed to comply with current codes—due to an ensemble of 78 ground motions scaled to four intensity levels were computed by MPA and nonlinear RHA, and compared. It is demonstrated that, even for the most intense ground motions that deform the buildings far into the inelastic range, the MPA procedure demonstrates an adequate degree of accuracy that should make it useful for practical application in estimating seismic demands for RC-SMRF buildings. In contrast the FEMA-356 force distributions are inadequate in estimating seismic demands for the 8-, 12-, and 20-story buildings at all excitation intensities, from the weakest that causes response essentially within the linearly elastic range, to the strongest that drives the buildings far into the inelastic range.

An evaluation ofP-Δ amplification factors in multistorey steel moment resisting frames

1999 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 535-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Tremblay ◽  
B Côté ◽  
P Léger
Keyword(s):  
Amplification Factor ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Beam Model ◽  
Steel Moment Resisting Frames ◽  
Moment Resisting Frame ◽  
Dynamic Analyses ◽  
Moment Resisting ◽  
Shear Beam ◽  
Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses ◽  
Shear Beam Model

Three different amplification factors that have been proposed to account for P-Δ effects in the seismic design of multistorey building structures are described and compared. Nonlinear dynamic analyses of a typical 20-storey steel moment resisting frame are carried out under earthquake ground motions typical of eastern and western Canada to evaluate the gravity load effects and to assess the effectiveness of each type of amplification factor in accounting for these effects. All three approaches maintain the ductility demand within the level computed without P-Δ effects, but lateral deformations are generally larger than those obtained neglecting the gravity loads. Nonlinear dynamic analyses are also performed on a shear-beam (stick) model of the same building to examine the possibility of using such simple models for studying the dynamic stability of buildings subjected to ground motions. The shear-beam model does not predict adequately the seismic behaviour of steel moment resisting frames for which P-Δ effects are significant.Key words: ductility, earthquake, ground motion, lateral deformation, moment resisting frame, P-Δ effects, push-over analysis, seismic, shear-beam model, stability coefficient, amplification factor.

scholarly journals Comparison of Scaling Ground Motions Using Arithmetic with Logarithm Values for Spectral Matching Procedure

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Rui Zhang ◽  
Dong-sheng Wang ◽  
Xiao-yu Chen ◽  
Hong-nan Li
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motions ◽  
Time History ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Time History Analysis ◽  
Spectral Matching ◽  
Moment Resisting Frame ◽  
History Analysis ◽  
Moment Resisting ◽  
Structural Responses ◽  
Structural Time

In recent studies, spectral matching is the most commonly proposed method for selecting earthquake records for time-history analysis of structures. However, until now, there have been no serious investigations of the effects of coordinate values on the scaling of ground motions. This paper investigated the influence of using arithmetic and logarithmic values of response spectra in spectral matching procedures (i.e., ASM and LSM methods) on the results of nonlinear structural time-history analysis. Steel moment resisting frame structures of the 3-, 9-, and 20-stories, which represent low-, medium-, and high-rise buildings, respectively, were used as examples. Structural benchmark responses were determined by calculating the arithmetic mean and median of peak interstory drift ratio (PIDR) demands based on the three record sets developed by the American SAC Steel Project. The three record sets represent seismic hazard levels with 50%, 10%, and 2% probabilities exceeded in 50 years, and their average acceleration spectra were also taken as the target spectrum. Moreover, another 40 record components for selection were scaled both by ASM and LSM methods. The seven components whose spectra were best compatible with the target spectra were selected for the structural time-history analysis. The scale factors obtained by the LSM method are nearly larger than that of the ASM method, and their ranking and selection of records are different. The estimation accuracies of structural mean (median) responses by both methods can be controlled within an engineering acceptable range (±20%), but the LSM method may cause larger structural responses than the ASM method. The LSM method has a better capacity for reducing the variability of structural responses than the ASM method, and this advantage is more significant for longer-period structures (e.g., 20-story structure) with more severe nonlinear responses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document