scholarly journals Effect of Atorvastatin and Losartan on Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Mild to Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-47
Author(s):  
Md Moniruzzaman Khan ◽  
Zesmin Fauzia Dewan ◽  
AKM Shahidur Rahman ◽  
Bakhtiare Md Shoeb Nomany ◽  
Ahmed Salam Mir ◽  
...  

Background: Atorvastatin, a member of HMG CO-A reductase inhibitors, has been shown to have renoprotective effect in patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Statins are supposed to decrease the oxidized lipid particles, suppress the activity of inflammatory mediators and prevent vascular thrombosis and thus could minimize renal cell damage. Losartan, an antihypertensive drug also diminishes proteinuria in patients with chronic kidney diseases or diabetes mellitus. Therefore the effect of concurrent use of atorvastatin and losartan on Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) could be a matter of interest from both Pharmacological and Clinical perspective. Objective: To assess the renoprotective effect of atorvastatin and losartan in patients with chronic kidney disease treated at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU). Materials and Method: Total forty four (44) patients suffering from CKD (stage one to stage three) were enrolled into two groups. Patients in Group A, received atorvastatin (10 mg) and losartan (50 mg) once daily for eight weeks. Patients in Group B, received losartan but not atorvastatin for the same duration. Serum creatinine level was measured at the commencement and also after eight weeks to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in individual patients with MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) study equation. Results: There was significant (P < 0.001) reduction of Serum Creatinine and significant (P < 0.001) increase in e GFR in the patients, treated with atorvastatin and losartan. Conclusion: Concurrent administration of atorvastatin and losartan increased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) significantly in patients with chronic kidney disease. KYAMC Journal Vol. 10, No.-1, April 2019, Page 43-47

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Arici

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has diverse presentations that are frequently subclinical early in its course but symptomatic in more advanced stages. Quite commonly, kidney disease is diagnosed as an incidental finding in blood or urine tests. It is therefore crucial to understand how to assess kidney function tests and know the diverse presentations of kidney diseases in clinical practice. Assessment of kidney function mainly comprises three important steps: measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR), estimation of urine albumin or protein excretion, and urinalysis/sediment examination. Estimating GFR based on a filtration marker (usually serum creatinine) is now widely accepted as the initial test. Several GFR prediction equations that use serum creatinine or other filtration markers along with certain patient characteristics (such as age, gender, and race) are used to estimate GFR, though several limitations must be considered when interpreting their results. Measurement of proteinuria or albuminuria provides insights into etiology (glomerular versus other parenchymal kidney diseases) and an assessment of risk of progression (ie, greater proteinuria, higher risk of progression). A complete examination of urine should be performed in all kidney patients. Urinalysis/sediment examination provides important information for both differential diagnosis of acute kidney disease (AKD) and CKD and clues for underlying etiologies of kidney disease. Several serologic tests and selected imaging studies complement the assessment of kidney diseases. Renal biopsy is occasionally required to specify the exact diagnosis and direct the treatment. All these investigations should be performed to determine the duration of kidney disease (ie, acute or chronic), designate the specific etiology, assess the risk for progression, and evaluate the presence of complications. Recently, several risk stratification scores or prediction models were developed for early diagnosis or predicting prognosis of acute kidney injury or CKD. These risk models may help to decrease the huge burden of kidney diseases on the individual as well as social level. This review contains 1 figure, 11 tables and 29 references Key Words: albumin-creatinine ratio, albuminuria, biomarkers, eGFR, chronic kidney disease, cystatin C, history, imaging, glomerular filtration rate , physical examination, renal biopsy, serum creatinine, urinalysis


2012 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Jerums ◽  
Elif Ekinci ◽  
Sianna Panagiotopoulos ◽  
Richard J MacIsaac ◽  
◽  
...  

In the early 1980s, studies in type 1 diabetes suggested that glomerular filtration rate (GFR) loss begins with the onset of macroalbuminuria. However, recent evidence indicates that up to one-quarter of subjects with diabetes reach a GFR of less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2(chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage 3) before developing micro- or macroalbuminuria. Furthermore, the prospective loss of GFR can be detected in early diabetic nephropathy (DN) well before CKD stage 3. Early GFR loss usually reflects DN in type 1 diabetes but, in older patients with type 2 diabetes, the assessment of early GFR loss needs to take into account the effects of aging. The assessment of GFR is now feasible at clinical level, using formulas based on serum creatinine, age, gender, and ethnicity. Overall, the estimation of early GFR loss is more accurate with the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD–EPI) formula than with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study formula, but there is some evidence that the CKD-EPI formula does not exhibit better performance than the MDRD formula for estimating GFR in diabetes. Both formulas underestimate GFR in the hyperfiltration range. Formulas based on the reciprocal of cystatin C can also be used to estimate GFR, but their cost and lack of assay standardization have delayed their use at clinical level. In summary, early GFR loss is an important marker of DN as well as a potentially reversible target for interventions in DN.


Author(s):  
Sean Currin ◽  
Mwawi Gondwe ◽  
Nokthula Mayindi ◽  
Shingirai Chipungu ◽  
Bongekile Khoza ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives The prevalence of chronic kidney disease is rising rapidly in low- and middle-income countries. Serum creatinine and estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are critical diagnostic tools, yet access to centralised laboratory services remains limited in primary care resource-limited settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate point-of-care (POC) technologies for serum creatinine measurement and to compare their performance to a gold standard measurement using iohexol measured GFR (mGFR). Methods POC creatinine was measured using iSTAT® and StatSensor® devices in capillary and venous whole blood, and laboratory creatinine was measured using the compensated kinetic Jaffe method in 670 participants from a rural area in South Africa. GFR estimating equations Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (CKD-EPI and MDRD) for POC and laboratory creatinine were compared to iohexol mGFR. Results Calculated GFR for laboratory and POC creatinine measurements overestimated GFR (positive bias of 1.9–34.1 mL/min/1.73 m2). However, all POC devices had less positive bias than the laboratory Jaffe method (1.9–14.7 vs. 34.1 for MDRD, and 8.4–19.9 vs. 28.6 for CKD-EPI). Accuracy within 30% of mGFR ranged from 0.56 to 0.72 for POC devices and from 0.36 to 0.43 for the laboratory Jaffe method. POC devices showed wider imprecision with coefficients of variation ranging from 4.6 to 10.2% compared to 3.5% for the laboratory Jaffe method. Conclusions POC estimated GFR (eGFR) showed improved performance over laboratory Jaffe eGFR, however POC devices suffered from imprecision and large bias. The laboratory Jaffe method performed poorly, highlighting the need for laboratories to move to enzymatic methods to measure creatinine.


2020 ◽  
pp. 86-89
Author(s):  
Hülya Nalçaçıoğlu ◽  
Demet Tekcan ◽  
Özlem Aydoğ

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease and its complications are among the most frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with meningomyelocele. Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine the risk factors leading to chronic kidney disease progression in these patients. Material and Method: Fifty patients with meningomyelocele were analyzed retrospectively. Age, gender, followup period, serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), initial urodynamic findings and initiation time of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) were noted. The progression of Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was evaluated by DMSA renal scintigraphy, changes in serum creatinine (Screa), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Results: 30 of the 50 patients were included in the study. VUR was detected in 63% of the patients, and scar was detected in 83% by renal scintigraphy. The median value of Screa was 0.5 mg/dl in admission, while the median Screa was 1.02 mg/dl (min-max: 0.27-5) at the last visit and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.001). A statistically significant was found between CKD progression and GFR in admission (p=0.001), CIC onset age (p=0.03), degree of VUR (p=0.046), presence of renal scar (p=0.002). It was shown that delay in admission (p=0.011; OR 1.36; CI 1.07-1.73) and low GFR in admission (p=0.036 OR 0.915 CI 0.842-0.994) were the most important risk factors. Conclusion: In our study, it was shown that delay in neurogenic bladder treatment, delay in the initiation of CIC, and low GFR at admission were important risk factors for the progression of CKD in children with meningomyelocele. Therefore, we aimed to emphasize the importance of regular follow-up of these children in Pediatric Nephrology Clinics from the neonatal period.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (04) ◽  
pp. 506-512
Author(s):  
MUHAMMAD ASIF ◽  
MUHAMMAD AKRAM ◽  
ATIF ULLAH

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as kidney damage or glomerular filtration rate <60ml/min/1.73mfor 3 months or more, irrespective of cause. Objective: To measure glomerular filtration rate, free thyroxin, thyrotrophin in chronic kidneydisease patients and to find out the correlation between glomerular filtration rate, free thyroxin and thyrotrphin in these patients. StudyDesign: Cross sectional analytical study. Setting: Post Graduate Medical Institute (PGMI), Lahore General Hospital (LGH) Lahore. Period:6 months (Nov 2011 to April 2012). Material and Methods: Sixty five patients were included in the study. Serum Creatinine, TSH and FreeT4 were measured; Thyroid function tests TSH, FT4 were measured in these chronic kidney disease patients through enzyme linkedimmunosorbant assay method. GFR was calculated through Cock-croft-Gualt formula and the relevant data was entered in a predesignedProforma. Results: In the study total 65 chronic kidney disease patients were taken. Out of which thirty six (55.4%) were male and twentynine (44.6%) were female. Thirty five (53.8%) CKD patients whose TSH levels were above the normal limit while in the remaining patientsthe TSH values were in the normal range. Eight patients (12.3%) out of sixty five patients in whom FT4 values were below the normal limitwhile in the remaining fifty seven patients (87.6%) FT4 values were within the reference range. Those eight patients whose FT4 wasbelow the normal value, their TSH values were above the normal value too. Thirty five patients, whose TSH levels were above the normal2 limit, their mean age was 50.60± 11.95, mean serum creatinine was 4.73± 2.94 mg/dl, mean GFR was 22.17± 12.48 ml/min/1.73m ,mean TSH was 6.68± 0.87 mIU/L and mean FT4 was 0.97± 0.35 ng/dl. The p-value of TSH was < 0.001 and FT4 was < 0.05 incomparing with normal. Glomerular filtrations rate with TSH and FT4 the co-efficient of correlation (r) value for 35 patients to be – 0.713and 0.47 for TSH and FT4 respectively. Their p- values were 0.000 and 0.004 respectively, and p < 0.001 collectively. This was found tobe statistically significant. Linear regression line was obtained between GFR and TSH and GFR and FT4 in CKD patients. Conclusions:From these correlation studies I concluded that the chronic kidney disease is associated with biochemical thyroid dysfunctions causingmost commonly subclinical hypothyroidism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document