scholarly journals Comparison between infiltration and inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia for extraction of Advance periodontitis of mandibular molars

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-15
Author(s):  
Muhammad Mubashirul Haque ◽  
Mostafa Md Anisuzzaman ◽  
Sajid Hasan ◽  
Nubad Adnan
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Block ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Anesthetic Technique ◽  
P Value ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Dental Surgery ◽  
Mandibular Molars ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Nerve Block Anesthesia

Aim: The focus of the education was to assess the success between localanesthetic infiltration injection and inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia in extraction of Chronic periodontitis mandibular posterior teeth. Methods: 100 patients aged between 13 and 73 years who attended the Department of Dental surgery, BIRDEM General Hospital for extraction of advance periodontitis of mandibular molars were included in this study. For the infiltration anesthetic technique, patient’s approval was taken. The patients were equally divided into two groups. Group (1) received 0.6 ml out of 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine with 1:80000 adrenaline injection bucally and the same amount infiltration lingually opposite the intended tooth. Group (2) received 1.5 ml out of 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine with 1:80000 and the remaining 0.3 ml was injected for long buccal nerve anesthesia. Results: In this Study we found 88% patients were pain free and Group-2 94% patients were pain free During extraction of Advance periodontitis of mandibular molars. P-value was 0.138 and it was not < 0.05. So it was not significant. On the other side 103 patients out of 113 were pain free in male and 79 patients out of 87 were pain free in female and 6 patients out of 87 were feeling pain during tooth extraction of advance periodontitis of mandibular molars. P-value was 0.138 and it was not < 0.05. So it was not significant. Conclusion: Infiltration anesthesia for non-vital mandibular molars is effective as a substitute for inferior alveolar block technique. Update Dent. Coll. j: 2020; 10 (1): 13-15

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of anti inflammatory effect of bromelain-trypsin combination versus diclofenac sodium after surgical removal of mandibular third molar teeth

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
ASM Ariful Islam ◽  
Mohammad Asifur Rahman ◽  
Shakhawat Hossain ◽  
Quazi Billur Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Diclofenac Sodium ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Anesthetic Technique ◽  
P Value ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Dental Surgery ◽  
Mandibular Molars ◽  
Group 2

Aim: The focus of the education was to assess the success between localanesthetic infiltration injection and inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia in extraction of Chronic periodontitis mandibular posterior teeth. Methods: 100 patients aged between 13 and 73 years who attended the Department of Dental surgery, BIRDEM General Hospital for extraction of advance periodontitis of mandibular molars were included in this study. For the infiltration anesthetic technique, patient’s approval was taken. The patients were equally divided into two groups. Group (1) received 0.6 ml out of 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine with 1:80000 adrenaline injection bucally and the same amount infiltration lingually opposite the intended tooth. Group (2) received 1.5 ml out of 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine with 1:80000 and the remaining 0.3 ml was injected for long buccal nerve anesthesia. Results: In this Study we found 88% patients were pain free and Group-2 94% patients were pain free During extraction of Advance periodontitis of mandibular molars. P-value was 0.138 and it was not < 0.05. So it was not significant. On the other side 103 patients out of 113 were pain free in male and 79 patients out of 87 were pain free in female and 6 patients out of 87 were feeling pain during tooth extraction of advance periodontitis of mandibular molars. P-value was 0.138 and it was not < 0.05. So it was not significant. Conclusion: Infiltration anesthesia for non-vital mandibular molars is effective as a substitute for inferior alveolar block technique. Update Dent. Coll. j: 2020; 10 (1): 16-20

scholarly journals Anesthetic Efficacy in Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos E. Allegretti ◽  
Roberta M. Sampaio ◽  
Anna C. R. T. Horliana ◽  
Paschoal L. Armonia ◽  
Rodney G. Rocha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Mandibular Molars ◽  
School Of Dentistry ◽  
Mandibular Posterior Teeth ◽  
Pulpal Anesthesia ◽  
Irreversible Pulpitis

Abstract Inferior alveolar nerve block has a high failure rate in the treatment of mandibular posterior teeth with irreversible pulpitis. The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine, 2% lidocaine and 2% mepivacaine, all in combination with 1:100,000 epinephrine, in patients with irreversible pulpitis of permanent mandibular molars during a pulpectomy procedure. Sixty-six volunteers from the Emergency Center of the School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, randomly received 3.6 mL of local anesthetic as a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). The subjective signal of lip numbness, pulpal anesthesia and absence of pain during the pulpectomy procedure were evaluated respectively, by questioning the patient, stimulation using an electric pulp tester and a verbal analogue scale. All patients reported the subjective signal of lip numbness. Regarding pulpal anesthesia success as measured with the pulp tester, the success rate was respectively 68.2% for mepivacaine, 63.6% for articaine and 63.6% for lidocaine. Regarding patients who reported no pain or mild pain during the pulpectomy, the success rate was, respectively 72.7% for mepivacaine, 63.6% for articaine and 54.5% for lidocaine. These differences were not statistically significant. Neither of the solutions resulted in 100% anesthetic success in patients with irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molars.

scholarly journals Effectiveness comparison of inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia using direct and indirect technique

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 171
Author(s):  
Rehatta Yongki ◽  
Netty N. Kawulusan ◽  
Iis Purwanti
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Block ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Anesthetic Technique ◽  
Aspiration Level ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block ◽  
Direct Technique ◽  
Indirect Technique ◽  
Anesthesia Depth ◽  
Nerve Block Anesthesia

Local anesthesia is important to do prior to tooth extraction procedure to control the patient's pain. Local anesthetic technique in dentistry consists of topical, infiltration, and anesthetic blocks. For molar tooth extraction, mandibular block technique is used either direct or indirect. This study aimed to see if there are differences in effectiveness of inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia techniques between direct and indirect. This clinical experimental design study used 20 patients as samples during February-April. 10 patients were taken as a group that carried out direct technique while 10 others group conducted indirect techniques. The sample selection using purposive sampling method. Pain level were measured using objective assessments (pain experienced by the patient after a given stimulus) and subjective evaluation (thick taste perceived by the patient). The average time of onset in direct and indirect techniques in each sample was 16.88 ± 5.30 and 102.00 ± 19.56 seconds (subjectively) and 22.50 ± 8.02 and 159.00 ± 25.10 (objectively). These results indicated direct techniques onset faster than indirect techniques. The average duration of direct and indirect techniques respectively was 121.63 ± 8.80 and 87.80 ± 9.96 minutes (subjectively) and 91.88 ± 8.37 and 60.20 ± 10.40 minutes (objectively). These results indicated the duration of direct technique is longer than indirect technique. There was no significant difference when viewed from anesthesia depth and aspiration level. This study indicated that direct technique had better effect than indirect technique in terms of onset and duration, while in terms of anesthesia depth and aspiration level was relatively equal. Insignificant differences were obtained when assessing anesthetic technique successful rate based on gender, age and extracted tooth.

scholarly journals RCT on the effectiveness of the intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block on pain during dental treatment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahaa R. Youssef ◽  
Andreas Söhnel ◽  
Alexander Welk ◽  
Mohamed H. Abudrya ◽  
Mohamed Baider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Mandibular Posterior Teeth ◽  
Numeric Rating

Abstract Objective To compare the effectiveness and complications of intraligamentary anesthesia (ILA) with conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) during injection and dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth. Materials and methods In this randomized, prospective clinical trial, 72 patients (39 males, 33 females), scheduled for dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth, were randomly allocated to ILA group (n = 35) received ILA injection or IANB group (n = 37) received the conventional IANB. Our primary outcome was to assess pain and stress (discomfort) during the injection and dental treatment, using the numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10= the worst pain imaginable), whereas recording 24-h postoperative complications was our secondary outcomes. Results Patients in ILA group reported significantly less pain during injection when compared with IANB group (p = 0.03), while pain during dental treatment was similar in both groups (p = 0.2). Patients in both groups also reported similar law values of discomfort during treatment (p = 0.7). Although no signs of nerve contact or any other postoperative complications were observed, five patients in IANB group (none in ILA group) reported temporary irritations. Conclusion This study showed equivalent effectiveness of both intraligamentary anesthesia and conventional inferior alveolar nerve block, for pain control during routine dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth. Nevertheless, ILA showed significantly less pain during injection. No major postoperative complications in both groups were observed. Clinical relevance ILA could be considered as an effective alternative for routine dental treatment. Trial registration NCT04563351

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document