scholarly journals Cochlear Implant Failure due to Cochlear Nerve Deficiency in a Child with Normal Internal Auditory Canal

Author(s):  
So-Hyang Kim ◽  
Sung-Wook Jeong ◽  
Lee-Suk Kim
2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Roland ◽  
Kathryn Henion ◽  
Timothy Booth ◽  
Julia Dee Campbell ◽  
Anu Sharma

2002 ◽  
Vol 116 (10) ◽  
pp. 804-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Levent Sennaroglu ◽  
Isil Saatci ◽  
Ayse Aralasmak ◽  
Bulent Gursel ◽  
Ergin Turan

Recent reports indicate that the cochlear nerve may be absent in some cases of congenital sensorineural hearing loss. The aim of this prospective study was to determine the incidence of cochlear nerve anomaly in cochlear implant candidates with congenital hearing loss using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Twenty-seven patients with congenital profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss who were being evaluated for the cochlear implant procedure were studied.These patients had high-resolution computerized tomography (CT), through the petrous bone in axial sections. MRI examinations consisted of T1 and turbo spin echo (TSE) T2-weighted 3 mm axial images, and additional 3D Fourier Transform T2-weighted TSE sequences obtained on three different planes (axial, perpendicular and parallel to the internal auditory canal (IAC) i.e. oblique sagittal and coronal, respectively) for the purpose of cochlear nerve demonstration. Results showed that all of the 14 patients with normal CT of the temporal bone, had four distinct nerves in the distal part of the IAC on TSE-MRI. Thirteen patients demonstrated various bony malformations of the cochleovestibular system on CT. MRI revealed the absence of the cochleovestibular nerve in four patients where the IAC was very narrow or completely absent on CT. One patient with severe Mondini malformation who had an enlarged IAC demonstrated an isolated absent cochlear nerve.


2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime Leigh ◽  
Gary Rance ◽  
Shani Dettman ◽  
Richard Dowell

Abstract Cochlear implantation is currently the intervention option of choice for many children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) who are unable to obtain benefit from conventional amplification. The aim of this study was to review the speech perception and language outcomes for children with ANSD who had received a cochlear implant and highlight specific clinical considerations for working with this population of children with hearing impairment who are being considered for implantation. Finds for the group of 17 children with ANSD using cochlear implants were compared to previously reported outcomes for children with sensori-neural (SN) type hearing loss using cochlear implants. Two children, identified with cochlear nerve deficiency pre-operatively, received no useful auditory percepts from their cochlear implant and discontinued device use. The remaining children demonstrated speech perception and language outcomes comparable to those observed for SN hearing loss peers using cochlear implants. This paper highlights a number of considerations for clinicians to be aware of and the importance of careful counseling pre-operatively regarding the potential for less-than-optimal outcomes, particularly for those children identified with cochlear nerve deficiency.


2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 1188-1196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuman He ◽  
John Grose ◽  
Anna X. Hang ◽  
Craig A. Buchman

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 216-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Friedmann ◽  
Leena Asfour ◽  
William H. Shapiro ◽  
J. Thomas Roland Jr. ◽  
Susan B. Waltzman

Objective: To assess bimodal auditory performance in children with a cochlear implant (CI) and contralateral auditory brainstem implant (ABI). Methods: This is a retrospective case review performed at a tertiary referral center. Four patients with cochlear nerve deficiency initially underwent cochlear implantation but were not benefiting from their devices and underwent ABI in the contralateral ear. The main outcome measures included age-appropriate speech perception and production assessments. Results: Three subjects performed better on their auditory perception assessments using both of their devices than with either device alone. One subject had only preliminary outcomes, but subjectively performed best with both devices. Conclusions: We observed continued improvement in CI performance over time, even if no benefit was evident before the decision for ABI. This could suggest that ABI and CI have a synergistic effect, or it could simply be the adaptive ability of the developing brain to utilize the signals coming from these devices. There is preliminary evidence to support choosing the ear contralateral to the CI for an ABI in a pediatric patient with bilateral cochlear nerve deficiency.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Joon Han ◽  
Myung-Whan Suh ◽  
Moo Kyun Park ◽  
Ja-Won Koo ◽  
Jun Ho Lee ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 685-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingmei Wei ◽  
Yongxin Li ◽  
Biao Chen ◽  
Yue Gong ◽  
Qian-Jie Fu ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 793-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver F. Adunka ◽  
Patricia A. Roush ◽  
Holly F. B. Teagle ◽  
Carolyn J. Brown ◽  
Carlton J. Zdanski ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Yan ◽  
Jianhong Li ◽  
Junfang Xian ◽  
Zhenchang Wang ◽  
Lingyan Mo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document