scholarly journals Measuring Curriculum Effectiveness for Developing Principled Leaders in an Undergraduate Engineering Program

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Levin ◽  
John H. Wyckoff

This study identifies student variables that predict persistence and success in an undergraduate engineering program. Three logistic models were developed that predicted the probability of persisting successfully. Significant predictors included both cognitive and noncognitive variables; students who did well in science and mathematics courses and who were genuinely interested in engineering were more likely to persist and succeed. Predictor variables were not constant over time but changed as students progressed through the first two years of study, with performance in prerequisite science and mathematics courses emerging as the best predictors. The authors briefly discuss academic advising implications.


Author(s):  
Amy Buitenhuis

The purpose of this study is to explore the role that the engineering undergraduate degree plays in the socialization process of professional engineers.  I will look at how exclusion is normalized through undergraduate education.  To do this, I will analyze the history and content of the Iron Ring Ceremony. This ceremony has symbolic significance to engineering students as it marks the completion of the undergraduate degree. It is also a ceremony unique to Canada, which will provide insights into the engineering profession in the Canadian context. I will also conduct interviews with 12 graduates of the Queen's undergraduate engineering program to gain insights into how engineering undergraduate education plays a role in shaping engineering identities. I will use my findings regarding the Iron Ring Ceremony to understand feelings of belonging and patterns of exclusion and inclusion throughout undergraduate engineering education.


1979 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 540-545
Author(s):  
A. Bar-Cohen

Approaches to engineering design education in several developing and developed nations are reviewed and found to suggest widespread recognition of the need for early and frequent student exposure to the pragmatic and often controlling aspects of mechanical system design. In this context, it appears that the undergraduate engineering program at most U.S. Universities may not contribute to the ability of engineering students to pursue successful careers in engineering innovation and design.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document