scholarly journals Systematic Preventable Trauma Death Rate Survey to Establish the Region-based Inclusive Trauma System in a Representative Province of Korea

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (50) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junsik Kwon ◽  
Jin-Hee Lee ◽  
Kyungjin Hwang ◽  
Yunjung Heo ◽  
Hang Joo Cho ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoungwon Jung ◽  
Junsik Kwon ◽  
Yo Huh ◽  
Jonghwan Moon ◽  
Kyungjin Hwang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Although Korea is a high-income country, its trauma system is comparable to low- and middle-income countries with high preventable trauma death rates (> 30%). Since 2012, Korea has established a national trauma system based on the implementation of regional trauma centers and improvement of the transfer system; this study aimed to evaluate its effectiveness.Methods: We compared the national preventable trauma death rates, transfer patterns, and outcomes between 2015 and 2017. The review of preventable trauma deaths was conducted by multiple panels and a severity-adjusted logistic regression model was created to identify factors influencing the preventable trauma death rate. We also compared the number of trauma patients transferred to emergency medical institutions and mortality in models adjusted with injury severity scores.Results: The preventable trauma death rate decreased from 2015 to 2017 (30.5% vs. 19.9%, p < 0.001). In the severity-adjusted model, the preventable trauma death risk had a lower odds ratio (0.68, 95% confidence interval: 0.53–0.87, p = 0.002) in 2017 than in 2015. Regional trauma centers received 1.6 times more severe cases in 2017 (according to the International Classification of Diseases Injury Severity Score [ICISS]; 23.1% vs. 36.5%). In the extended ICISS model, the overall trauma mortality decreased significantly from 2.1% (1008/47806) to 1.9% (1062/55057) (p = 0.041).Conclusions: Establishment of the national trauma system was associated with significant improvements in performance and outcomes of trauma care. This was mainly because of the implementation of regional trauma centers and because more severe patients were transferred to regional trauma centers. This study might be a good model for low- and middle-income countries, which lack a trauma system.


2022 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. e0000162
Author(s):  
Kyoungwon Jung ◽  
Junsik Kwon ◽  
Yo Huh ◽  
Jonghwan Moon ◽  
Kyungjin Hwang ◽  
...  

Although South Korea is a high-income country, its trauma system is comparable to low- and middle-income countries with high preventable trauma death rates of more than 30%. Since 2012, South Korea has established a national trauma system based on the implementation of regional trauma centers and improvement of the transfer system; this study aimed to evaluate its effectiveness. We compared the national preventable trauma death rates, transfer patterns, and outcomes between 2015 and 2017. The review of preventable trauma deaths was conducted by multiple panels, and a severity-adjusted logistic regression model was created to identify factors influencing the preventable trauma death rate. We also compared the number of trauma patients transferred to emergency medical institutions and mortality in models adjusted with injury severity scores. The preventable trauma death rate decreased from 2015 to 2017 (30.5% vs. 19.9%, p < 0.001). In the severity-adjusted model, the preventable trauma death risk had a lower odds ratio (0.68, 95% confidence interval: 0.53–0.87, p = 0.002) in 2017 than in 2015. Regional trauma centers received 1.6 times more severe cases in 2017 (according to the International Classification of Diseases Injury Severity Score [ICISS]; 23.1% vs. 36.5%). In the extended ICISS model, the overall trauma mortality decreased significantly from 2.1% (1008/47 806) to 1.9% (1062/55 057) (p = 0.041). The establishment of the national trauma system was associated with significant improvements in the performance and outcomes of trauma care. This was mainly because of the implementation of regional trauma centers and because more severe patients were transferred to regional trauma centers. This study might be a good model for low- and middle-income countries, which lack a trauma system.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoungwon Jung ◽  
Ikhan Kim ◽  
Sue K. Park ◽  
Hyunmin Cho ◽  
Chan Yong Park ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 115-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chan Yong Park ◽  
Byungchul Yu ◽  
Ho Hyun Kim ◽  
Jung Joo Hwang ◽  
Jungnam Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 236-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungbae Moon ◽  
Suk Hee Lee ◽  
Hyun Wook Ryoo ◽  
Jong Kun Kim ◽  
Jae Yun Ahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. e000106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy A Drake ◽  
Dwayne A Wolf ◽  
Janet C Meininger ◽  
Stanley G Cron ◽  
Thomas Reynold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S59-S60
Author(s):  
G. Genois ◽  
I. Vlahovic ◽  
L. Moore ◽  
B. Beck ◽  
P. Blanchard ◽  
...  

Introduction: Trauma care is highly complex and prone to medical errors. Accordingly, several studies have identified adverse events and conditions leading to potentially preventable or preventable deaths. Depending on the availability of specialized trauma care and the trauma system organization, between 10 and 30% of trauma-related deaths worldwide could be preventable if optimal care was promptly delivered. This narrative review aims to identify the main determinants and areas for improvements associated with potentially preventable trauma mortality. Methods: A literature review was performed using Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1990 to a maximum of 6 months before submission for publication. Experimental or observational studies that have assessed determinants and areas for improvements that are associated with trauma death preventability were considered for inclusion. Two researchers independently selected eligible studies and extracted the relevant data. The main areas for improvements were classified using the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations patient event taxonomy. No statistical analyses were performed given the data heterogeneity. Results: From the 3647 individual titles obtained by the search strategy, a total of 37 studies were included. Each study included between 72 and 35311 trauma patients who had sustained mostly blunt trauma, frequently following a fall or a motor vehicle accident. Preventability assessment was performed for 17 to 2081 patients using either a single expert assessment (n = 2, 5,4%) or an expert panel review (n = 35, 94.6%). The definition of preventability and the taxonomy used varied greatly between the studies. The rate of potentially preventable or preventable death ranged from 2.4% to 76.5%. The most frequently reported areas for improvement were treatment delay, diagnosis accuracy to avoid missed or incorrect diagnosis and adverse events associated with the initial procedures performed. The risk of bias of the included studies was high for 32 studies because of the retrospective design and the panel review preventability assessment. Conclusion: Deaths occurring after a trauma remain often preventable. Included studies have used unstandardized definitions of a preventable death and various methodologies to perform the preventability assessment. The proportion of preventable or potentially preventable death reported in each study ranged from 2.4% to 76.5%. Delayed treatment, missed or incorrect initial diagnosis and adverse events following a procedure were commonly associated with preventable trauma deaths and could be targeted to develop quality improvement and monitoring projects.


Ob Gyn News ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Moon

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (18) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
MICHELE G. SULLIVAN
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document