Compensation of dose distribution for sloping field in high energy electron

1976 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
SS Chu ◽  
BS Choi
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelkader Toutaoui ◽  
Nadia Khelassi-Toutaoui ◽  
Zakia Brahimi ◽  
AhmedChafik Chami

Radiology ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 683-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Okumura ◽  
Tomoyuki Mori ◽  
Toshio Kitagawa

1986 ◽  
Vol 59 (706) ◽  
pp. 1001-1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sho Matsubara ◽  
Yuji Kuwabara ◽  
Junichi Horiuch ◽  
Soji Suzuki ◽  
Masao Hoshina ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
L. -M. Peng ◽  
M. J. Whelan

In recent years there has been a trend in the structure determination of reconstructed surfaces to use high energy electron diffraction techniques, and to employ a kinematic approximation in analyzing the intensities of surface superlattice reflections. Experimentally this is motivated by the great success of the determination of the dimer adatom stacking fault (DAS) structure of the Si(111) 7 × 7 reconstructed surface.While in the case of transmission electron diffraction (TED) the validity of the kinematic approximation has been examined by using multislice calculations for Si and certain incident beam directions, far less has been done in the reflection high energy electron diffraction (RHEED) case. In this paper we aim to provide a thorough Bloch wave analysis of the various diffraction processes involved, and to set criteria on the validity for the kinematic analysis of the intensities of the surface superlattice reflections.The validity of the kinematic analysis, being common to both the TED and RHEED case, relies primarily on two underlying observations, namely (l)the surface superlattice scattering in the selvedge is kinematically dominating, and (2)the superlattice diffracted beams are uncoupled from the fundamental diffracted beams within the bulk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document