Early complications in surgery of umbilical and epigastric hernias

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 207-211

ntroduction: Repairs of umbilical and epigastric hernias are common surgical procedures; the choice of the surgical method generally depends on the size of the hernial sac and fascial defect. Methods: Data of patients operated on for umbilical or epigastric hernias in our hospital during two years were assessed retrospectively. The study group included 264 patients; 212 had an umbilical hernia and 52 had an epigastric hernia. We assessed epidemiologic and clinical parameters and their correlation with the occurrence of early postoperative complications. We also looked for the recurrence rate, although during only a short follow-up period. Results: In the case of umbilical hernias, early complications occurred in 6.7% (11/165) after surgery with a simple suture and in 4.3% (2/47) with mesh repair, and the recurrence rates were 3% (5/165) and 21.3% (10/47), respectively. The risk of early complications was significantly higher in larger hernias. The recurrence rate increased with older age, an increased size of the hernial sac and fascial defect, and in patients with type 2 diabetes. In epigastric hernias, early complications occurred in 5.3% (1/19) after surgery with a simple suture and in 6.1% (2/33) with mesh repair. Recurrences only occurred in operations with mesh repair, in 9% (3/33). The risk of early complications was significantly higher in type 2 diabetes patients. Conclusion: Early complications were slightly more frequent in epigastric hernia repairs with mesh implantation, but this was not the case of umbilical hernias. We recommend mesh implantation in larger and borderline sized hernias to reduce the risk of recurrence.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Wen-Jun Tu ◽  
Qingjia Zeng ◽  
Kai Wang ◽  
Yu Wang ◽  
Bao-Liang Sun ◽  
...  

Background. Although recent studies have focused on the use of metformin in treating ischemic stroke, there is little literature to support whether it can treat intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Therefore, this study is aimed at evaluating the possible effects of prestroke metformin (MET) on ICH patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods. From January 2010 to December 2019, all first-ever ICH patients with type 2 diabetes from our hospitals were included. All discharged patients would receive a one-time follow-up at 1 year after admission. Death, disability, and recurrence events were recorded. Results. We included 730 patients for analysis (the median age: 65 [IQR, 56-72] years and 57.7% was men). Of those patients, 281 (38.5%) had received MET before ICH (MET+), whereas 449 (61.5%) had not (MET−). MET (+) patients had a lower median baseline hematoma volume than did MET (-) patients (9.6 ml [IQR, 5.3-22.4 ml] vs. 14.7 ml [IQR, 7.9-28.6 ml]; P < 0.001 ). The inhospital mortality events were not significantly reduced in the MET (+) group compared with the MET (-) group (6.4% vs 8.9%, respectively; absolute difference, −2.5% [95% CI, −3.9% to −0.7%]; OR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.39 to 1.27]; P = 0.22 ). The 1-year mortality events were not significantly reduced in the MET (+) group compared with the MET (-) group (14.1% vs 17.4%, respectively; absolute difference, −3.3% [95% CI, −5.1% to −1.8%]; OR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.47 to 1.14]; P = 0.16 ). The 1-year disability events were not significantly reduced in the MET (+) group compared with the MET (-) group (28.4% vs 34.1%, respectively; absolute difference, −5.7% [95% CI, −8.2% to −3.3%]; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.52 to 1.13]; P = 0.18 ). Finally, the recurrence rates in those two groups were not significantly different (MET [+] vs. MET [-]: 6.4% vs. 5.9%; absolute difference, 0.5% [95% CI, 0.2% to 1.3%]; OR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.51 to 2.28]; P = 0.84 ). Conclusions. Pre-ICH metformin use was not associated with inhospital mortality and 1-year prognosis in diabetic ICH patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Henriksen ◽  
Kristian Kiim Jensen ◽  
Thue Bisgaard ◽  
Frederik Helgstrand

Abstract Aim High level evidence recommends the use of mesh for umbilical hernias with defects &gt;1 cm to reduce recurrence rates without increasing the risk of postoperative complications. For umbilical hernias with defect width ≤1 cm, the literature is sparse. The aim of the study was to assess outcomes after suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernias with defect width &lt;1 cm on a nationwide basis, and to evaluate outcomes after onlay mesh repair specifically. Material and Methods By merging data from the Danish Hernia Database and the National Patients Registry from January 2007 until December 2018, patients receiving elective repair of an umbilical hernia with defect width ≤1 cm were identified. Available data included details about comorbidity, surgical technique, 90-days readmission, 90-days reoperation and reoperation for recurrence. Results A total of 7,849 patients were included, of whom 25.7% (2,013/7,849) underwent mesh repair. The cumulative 5-year incidence of reoperation for recurrence was significantly decreased after mesh repair 3.1% (95% C.I. 2.1-4.1) compared with suture repair 6.7% (95% C.I. 6.0-7.4), P &lt; 0.001. Onlay mesh repairs had the lowest cumulative risk of recurrence at 5 years 2.0% (95% C.I. 0.6-3.5). For onlay mesh repairs, readmission 7.9%, (65/826)) and reoperation (3.9% (32/826)) rates within 90-days were comparable to suture repairs (6.5% (381/5,836) and 3.3% (192/5,836), P = 0.149 and P = 0.382, respectively. Conclusions Even for the smallest umbilical hernias, mesh repair significantly decreased the recurrence rate. Onlay mesh repair was associated with the lowest risk of recurrence without increasing early complications.


2011 ◽  
pp. no-no ◽  
Author(s):  
Anwar T Merchant ◽  
Monica Jethwani ◽  
Youn-Hee Choi ◽  
Elaine H Morrato ◽  
Angela D Liese ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 283-284
Author(s):  
Istvan Kovanecz ◽  
Monica G. Ferrini ◽  
Hugo H. Davila ◽  
Jacob Rajfer ◽  
Nestor F. Gonzalez-Cadavid
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
MIRIAM E. TUCKER
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
MARTIN J. ABRAHAMSON ◽  
BARRY J. GOLDSTEIN

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document