scholarly journals Agreement Between Invasive Wire-Based and Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment on Intermediate Coronary Stenoses

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Chin Chang ◽  
Yin-Hao Lee ◽  
Ming-Ju Chuang ◽  
Chien-Hung Hsueh ◽  
Ya-Wen Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fractional Flow Reserve ◽  
Functional Assessment ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Coronary Physiology ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Coronary Stenoses

Background: Angiography-based functional assessment of coronary stenoses emerges as a novel approach to assess coronary physiology. We sought to investigate the agreement between invasive coronary wire-based fractional flow reserve (FFR), resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), and angiography-based vessel FFR (vFFR) for the functional assessment of coronary stenoses in patients with coronary artery disease.Materials and Methods: Between Jan 01, 2018, and Dec 31, 2020, 298 patients with 385 intermediate lesions received invasive coronary wire-based functional assessment (FFR, RFR or both) at a single tertiary medical center. Coronary lesions involving ostium or left main artery were excluded. vFFR analysis was performed retrospectively based on aortic root pressure and two angiographic projections.Results: In total, 236 patients with 291 lesions were eligible for vFFR analysis. FFR and RFR were performed in 258 and 162 lesions, respectively. The mean FFR, RFR and vFFR value were 0.84 ± 0.08, 0.90 ± 0.09, and 0.83 ± 0.10. vFFR was significantly correlated with FFR (r = 0.708, P < 0.001) and RFR (r = 0.673, P < 0.001). The diagnostic performance of vFFR vs. FFR was accuracy 81.8%, sensitivity 77.4%, specificity 83.9%, positive predictive value 69.9%, and negative predictive value 88.5%. The discriminative power of vFFR for FFR ≤ 0.80 or RFR ≤ 0.89 was excellent. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.87 (95% CI:0.83–0.92) for FFR and 0.80 (95% CI:0.73–0.88) for RFR.Conclusion: Angiography-based vFFR has a substantial agreement with invasive wire-based FFR and RFR in patients with intermediate coronary stenoses. vFFR can be utilized to assess coronary physiology without a pressure wire in a post hoc manner.

scholarly journals Accuracy of computational pressure-fluid dynamics applied to coronary angiography to derive fractional flow reserve: FLASH FFR

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (7) ◽  
pp. 1349-1356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianping Li ◽  
Yanjun Gong ◽  
Weimin Wang ◽  
Qing Yang ◽  
Bin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Dynamics ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Fractional Flow Reserve ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Performance Goal ◽  
Flow Reserve

Abstract Aims Conventional fractional flow reserve (FFR) is measured invasively using a coronary guidewire equipped with a pressure sensor. A non-invasive derived FFR would eliminate risk of coronary injury, minimize technical limitations, and potentially increase adoption. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a computational pressure-flow dynamics derived FFR (caFFR), applied to coronary angiography, compared to invasive FFR. Methods and results The FLASH FFR study was a prospective, multicentre, single-arm study conducted at six centres in China. Eligible patients had native coronary artery target lesions with visually estimated diameter stenosis of 30–90% and diagnosis of stable or unstable angina pectoris. Using computational pressure-fluid dynamics, in conjunction with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count, applied to coronary angiography, caFFR was measured online in real-time and compared blind to conventional invasive FFR by an independent core laboratory. The primary endpoint was the agreement between caFFR and FFR, with a pre-specified performance goal of 84%. Between June and December 2018, matched caFFR and FFR measurements were performed in 328 coronary arteries. Total operational time for caFFR was 4.54 ± 1.48 min. caFFR was highly correlated to FFR (R = 0.89, P = 0.76) with a mean bias of −0.002 ± 0.049 (95% limits of agreement −0.098 to 0.093). The diagnostic performance of caFFR vs. FFR was diagnostic accuracy 95.7%, sensitivity 90.4%, specificity 98.6%, positive predictive value 97.2%, negative predictive value 95.0%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.979. Conclusions Using wire-based FFR as the reference, caFFR has high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. caFFR could eliminate the need of a pressure wire, technical error and potentially increase adoption of physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn Unique Identifier: ChiCTR1800019522.

scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of two-dimensional coronary angiographic derived fractional flow reserve

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Sadeghipour ◽  
H Babakhani ◽  
S Abdi ◽  
M Ghasemi ◽  
J Moosavi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fractional Flow Reserve ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Hybrid Strategy ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Pressure Wire ◽  
Computational Flow Dynamics ◽  
Diagnostic Coronary Angiography

Abstract Background Non-invasive fractional flow reserve (NiFFR) is an emerging method for evaluating the functional significance of a coronary lesion during diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). The method relies on the computational flow dynamics and the 3D reconstruction of the vessel extracted from CAG. In the present study, we sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance and applicability of 2D-based NiFFR. Methods In this prospective observational study, we evaluated 2D-based NiFFR in 279 candidates for invasive CAG and invasive FFR. NiFFR was calculated via 2 methods: variable NiFFR, in which the contrast transport time was extracted from the angiographic view, and fixed NiFFR, in which a prespecified frame count was applied. Results The final analysis was performed on 245 patients (250 lesions). Variable NiFFR had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 81.5%, an accuracy of 80.0%, a sensitivity of 82.2%, a specificity of 82.2%, a negative predictive value of 91.4%, and a positive predictive value of 63.6%. The mean difference between FFR and NiFFR was −0.0244 ±0.0616 (P≤0.0001). A pressure wire-free hybrid strategy was possible in 68.8% of our population with variable NiFFR. Conclusions Our 2D-based NiFFR yielded results comparable to those derived from 3D-based software. Our findings should, however, be confirmed in larger trials. Pressure wire-free hybrid strategy Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Additional value of deep learning computed tomographic angiography-based fractional flow reserve in detecting coronary stenosis and predicting outcomes

2021 ◽  
pp. 028418512098397
Author(s):  
Yang Li ◽  
Hong Qiu ◽  
Zhihui Hou ◽  
Jianfeng Zheng ◽  
Jianan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Unstable Angina ◽  
Fractional Flow Reserve ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Computed Tomographic Angiography ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Tomographic Angiography

Background Deep learning (DL) has achieved great success in medical imaging and could be utilized for the non-invasive calculation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) from coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) (CT-FFR). Purpose To examine the ability of a DL-based CT-FFR in detecting hemodynamic changes of stenosis. Material and Methods This study included 73 patients (85 vessels) who were suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD) and received CCTA followed by invasive FFR measurements within 90 days. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were compared between CT-FFR and CCTA. Thirty-nine patients who received drug therapy instead of revascularization were followed for up to 31 months. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), unstable angina, and rehospitalization were evaluated and compared between the study groups. Results At the patient level, CT-FFR achieved 90.4%, 93.6%, 88.1%, 85.3%, and 94.9% in accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV, respectively. At the vessel level, CT-FFR achieved 91.8%, 93.9%, 90.4%, 86.1%, and 95.9%, respectively. CT-FFR exceeded CCTA in these measurements at both levels. The vessel-level AUC for CT-FFR also outperformed that for CCTA (0.957 vs. 0.599, P < 0.0001). Patients with CT-FFR ≤0.8 had higher rates of rehospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 4.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08–18.9) and MACE (HR 7.26, 95% CI 0.88–59.8), as well as a lower rate of unstable angina (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.07–2.91). Conclusion CT-FFR is superior to conventional CCTA in differentiating functional myocardial ischemia. In addition, it has the potential to differentiate prognoses of patients with CAD.

P6175Prediction of coronary revascularization by coronary computed tomography angiography derived fractional flow reserve - different algorithms for interpretation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K T Madsen ◽  
K T Veien ◽  
B L Noergaard ◽  
P Larsen ◽  
L Deibjerg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Pain ◽  
Fractional Flow Reserve ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Coronary Cta ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Stable Chest Pain

Abstract Introduction Coronary CT angiography (CTA) derived fractional flow reserve (FFRct) is increasingly used for guiding referral to invasive procedures in patients with stable chest pain. However, optimal interpretation of FFRct-analysis in terms of location and threshold of applied FFRct-values is unclear. Purpose To evaluate the clinical performance of various vessel-specific physiological FFRct derived measures of ischemia for prediction of standard of care guided coronary revascularization in patients with stable chest pain and coronary artery disease as determined by coronary CTA. Methods Retrospective study in patients with stable chest pain referred for coronary angiography based on coronary CTA. Standard acquired coronary CTA data sets were transmitted for core-laboratory analysis at HeartFlow. Any FFRct value in the major coronary arteries ≥1.8 mm in diameter, including side branches, were registered. Lesions were categorized as positive for ischemia using 6 different algorithms: Lowest in vessel FFRct-value (1) ≤0.75 or (2) ≤0.80; 2 cm distal-to-lesion FFRct-value (3) ≤0.75 or (4) ≤0.80; ΔFFRct (5) ≥0.06 or a combination of 2 and 5. The personnel responsible for downstream patient management had no information regarding FFRct test results. Results A total of 172 patients were included. Revascularization was performed in 62 (35%) patients. The diagnostic performance of different FFRct algorithms for predicting standard of care guided coronary revascularization is shown in the Table. Revascularization Predictions by FFRct N=172 Diagnostic performance FFRCT false negative FFRCT false positive Values given as (%) No. of revasc vessels No. of abnormal vessels FFRCT Algorithm Sens Spec PPV NPV Acc 1 2 3 1 2 3 Distal FFRCT ≤0.75 77 68 58 84 72 12 2 0 29 5 1 Distal FFRCT ≤0.80 92 43 48 90 61 5 0 0 40 20 3 Lesion-specific FFRCT ≤0.75 68 86 74 83 80 17 3 0 12 3 0 Lesion-specific FFRCT ≤0.80 82 78 68 89 80 10 2 0 21 3 1 ΔFFRCT ≥0.06 98 36 47 98 59 1 0 0 51 19 0 Combinationa 92 54 53 92 67 5 0 0 39 12 0 aDistal FFRCT ≤0.80 and ΔFFRCT ≥0.06. Sens = sensitivity; Spec = specificity; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value; Acc = accuracy; FFRCT = fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CTA; ΔFFRCT = difference between FFRCT-value immediately proximal and distal to lesion; Revasc = revascularized. Conclusion The diagnostic performance of FFRct in terms of predicting standard of care guided coronary revascularization is dependent on the applied algorithm for interpretation of the FFRct-analysis.

Impact of Age on the Functional Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses With Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve

Angiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-69
Author(s):  
Monica Verdoia ◽  
Rocco Gioscia ◽  
Matteo Nardin ◽  
Federica Negro ◽  
Francesco Tonon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Fractional Flow Reserve ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Functional Evaluation ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Minimal Lumen Diameter ◽  
Coronary Stenoses ◽  
The Impact

The optimal strategy for assessing the ischemic significance of intermediate coronary stenoses with adenosine-induced fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is still debated. Few studies have previously assessed the impact of age on FFR and iFR, which was the aim of our study. Patients undergoing FFR and iFR evaluation for intermediate (40%-70%) coronary lesions were included and divided according to age. Fractional flow reserve was performed by intracoronary boluses of adenosine (60-1440 μg). Instantaneous wave-free ratio was automatically calculated. Among 148 patients undergoing FFR measurement of 166 lesions, 45.3% were ≥70 years. Elderly patients had higher minimal lumen diameter ( P = .03). We also observed a linear relationship between iFR and FFR independently of age. Fractional flow reserve values were higher in the elderly patients, whereas iFR was not related to age. A total of 33 lesions had a positive iFR with no difference for age (17.3% vs 22%, P = .56), while FFR <0.80 was more infrequent in the elderly patients (17.1% vs 34.8%, P = .02). In intermediate coronary stenoses, iFR and FFR correlation is unaffected by age. Fractional flow reserve is higher in the elderly patients, whereas iFR is less affected by age. Future large-scale studies are needed to define whether iFR should be the preferred choice in elderly patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document