scholarly journals An Optimized Pathway for the Differential Diagnosis of ACTH-Dependent Cushing’s Syndrome Based on Low-Dose Dexamethasone Suppression Test

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kang Chen ◽  
Shi Chen ◽  
Lin Lu ◽  
Huijuan Zhu ◽  
Xiaobo Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Cushing’S Syndrome ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Cushing's Syndrome ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression Test ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Cortisol ◽  
Suppression Test ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression

ContextTraditionally, low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (LDDST) was used to confirm the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome (CS), and high-dose dexamethasone suppression test (HDDST) was used to differentiate Cushing’s disease (CD) and ectopic adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) syndrome (EAS), but some studies suggested that HDDST might be replaced by LDDST. For the differential diagnosis of CS, dexamethasone suppression test was usually combined with other tests such as bilateral petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) and pituitary magnetic resonance imaging, but the optimal pathway to incorporate these tests is still controversial.ObjectivesTo develop an optimized pathway for the differential diagnosis of CD and EAS based on LDDST.Design and SettingSingle-center retrospective study (2011–2019).PatientsTwo hundred sixty-nine CD and 29 EAS patients with pathological diagnosis who underwent consecutive low- and high-dose DST.ResultsFor the differential diagnosis of CD and EAS, the area under curve (AUC) of LDDST using urine free cortisol (0.881) was higher than that using serum cortisol (0.685) (p < 0.001) in head-to-head comparison among a subgroup of 108 CD and 10 EAS. The AUC of LDDST (0.883) was higher than that of HDDST (0.834) among all the included patients. With the cutoff of <26%, the sensitivity and specificity of LDDST were 39.4% and 100%. We designed a new pathway in which BIPSS was only reserved for those patients with unsuppressed LDDST and adenoma <6mm, yielding an overall sensitivity of 97.7% and specificity of 86.7%.ConclusionLDDST had similar value to HDDST in differentiating CD and EAS using the specific cutoff point. The pathway that combined LDDST and BIPSS could differentiate CD and EAS accurately.

Serum cortisol concentrations during low dose dexamethasone suppression test to screen for Cushing's syndrome

BMJ ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 290 (6462) ◽  
pp. 158-159
Author(s):  
L. Kennedy ◽  
D. Hadden ◽  
B. Atkinson ◽  
B Sheridan ◽  
H. Johnston
Keyword(s):  
Cushing’S Syndrome ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Cushing's Syndrome ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression Test ◽  
Suppression Test ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression

scholarly journals Serum cortisol concentrations during low dose dexamethasone suppression test to screen for Cushing's syndrome.

BMJ ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 289 (6453) ◽  
pp. 1188-1191 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Kennedy ◽  
A B Atkinson ◽  
H Johnston ◽  
B Sheridan ◽  
D R Hadden
Keyword(s):  
Cushing’S Syndrome ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Cushing's Syndrome ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression Test ◽  
Suppression Test ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression

scholarly journals Diagnostic tests for Cushing's syndrome differ from published guidelines: data from ERCUSYN

2017 ◽  
Vol 176 (5) ◽  
pp. 613-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Valassi ◽  
Holger Franz ◽  
Thierry Brue ◽  
Richard A Feelders ◽  
Romana Netea-Maier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cushing’S Syndrome ◽  
Diagnostic Tests ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Cushing's Syndrome ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression Test ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Late Night ◽  
Free Cortisol ◽  
Suppression Test ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression

Objective To evaluate which tests are performed to diagnose hypercortisolism in patients included in the European Registry on Cushing’s syndrome (ERCUSYN), and to examine if their use differs from the current guidelines. Patients and methods We analyzed data on the diagnostic tests performed in 1341 patients with Cushing’s syndrome (CS) who have been entered into the ERCUSYN database between January 1, 2000 and January 31, 2016 from 57 centers in 26 European countries. Sixty-seven percent had pituitary-dependent CS (PIT-CS), 24% had adrenal-dependent CS (ADR-CS), 6% had CS from an ectopic source (ECT-CS) and 3% were classified as having CS from other causes (OTH-CS). Results Of the first-line tests, urinary free cortisol (UFC) test was performed in 78% of patients, overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) in 60% and late-night salivary cortisol (LSaC) in 25%. Use of LSaC increased in the last five years as compared with previous years (P < 0.01). Use of HDDST was slightly more frequent in the last 5 years as compared with previous years (P < 0.05). Of the additional tests, late-night serum cortisol (LSeC) was measured in 62% and 48-h 2 mg/day low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (LDDST) in 33% of cases. ACTH was performed in 78% of patients. LSeC and overnight 1 mg DST supported the diagnosis of both PIT-CS and ADR-CS more frequently than UFC (P < 0.05). Conclusions Use of diagnostic tests for CS varies across Europe and partly differs from the currently available guidelines. It would seem pertinent that a European consensus be established to determine the best diagnostic approach to CS, taking into account specific inter-country differences with regard to the availability of diagnostic tools.

scholarly journals Low-Dose and Standard Overnight and Low Dose-Two Day Dexamethasone Suppression Tests in Patients with Mild and/or Episodic Hypercortisolism

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (06) ◽  
pp. 453-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona Mojtahedzadeh ◽  
Nesyah Shaesteh ◽  
Mastaneh Haykani ◽  
Jennifer Tran ◽  
Michael Mangubat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cushing’S Syndrome ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Cushing's Syndrome ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression Test ◽  
Morning Cortisol ◽  
Morning Serum Cortisol ◽  
Suppression Test ◽  
Biochemical Testing ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression

AbstractWe previously reported on the lack of utility of the 1 mg overnight dexamethasone (DEX) test in mild and/or periodic Cushing’s syndrome, as most patients with the condition suppressed to 1 mg DEX. It is possible that a lower dose of DEX as part of an overnight DEX test might be able to distinguish between mild and/or periodic Cushing’s syndrome and those without the condition. The objective of the current study is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of a 0.25 mg overnight DEX suppression test, the standard 1 mg overnight DEX suppression test, and the two-day low-dose (Liddle test) DEX suppression test with and without correction for DEX levels in patients evaluated for mild and/or periodic Cushing’s syndrome. Thirty patients determined to have Cushing’s syndrome by biochemical testing and 14 patients determined not to have the condition had the 0.25 mg and standard 1 mg overnight DEX suppression test and the two-day low-dose DEX suppression tests. Our results show that morning serum cortisol and cortisol/DEX ratios following an overnight dexamethasone suppression test were similar in patients with Cushing’s syndrome and those not having Cushing’s syndrome. However, a morning cortisol value above 7.6 μg/dl following a dose of DEX of 0.25 mg was found in 12 patients with Cushing’s syndrome and none in those not having Cushing’s syndrome, suggesting that a high cortisol value after this low dose of dexamethasone can indicate that further testing for Cushing’s syndrome is warranted. Our data suggest that the traditional 1 mg overnight or the 2 mg/2 day DEX suppression testing should no longer be used as a screening test in patients who could have mild and/or periodic Cushing’s syndrome, while the 0.25 mg dose of DEX may pick up some patients with mild Cushing’s syndrome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document