scholarly journals Genomic Indexing by Somatic Gene Recombination of mRNA/ncRNA – Does It Play a Role in Genomic Mosaicism, Memory Formation, and Alzheimer’s Disease?

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Ueberham ◽  
Thomas Arendt
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moonseok Choi ◽  
Sang-Min Lee ◽  
Dongsoo Kim ◽  
Heh-In Im ◽  
Hye-Sun Kim ◽  
...  

AbstractThe morphological dynamics of astrocytes are altered in the hippocampus during memory induction. Astrocyte–neuron interactions on synapses are called tripartite synapses. These control the synaptic function in the central nervous system. Astrocytes are activated in a reactive state by STAT3 phosphorylation in 5XFAD mice, an Alzheimer’s disease (AD) animal model. However, changes in astrocyte–neuron interactions in reactive or resting-state astrocytes during memory induction remain to be defined. Here, we investigated the time-dependent changes in astrocyte morphology and the number of astrocyte–neuron interactions in the hippocampus over the course of long-term memory formation in 5XFAD mice. Hippocampal-dependent long-term memory was induced using a contextual fear conditioning test in 5XFAD mice. The number of astrocytic processes increased in both wild-type and 5XFAD mice during memory formation. To assess astrocyte–neuron interactions in the hippocampal dentate gyrus, we counted the colocalization of glial fibrillary acidic protein and postsynaptic density protein 95 via immunofluorescence. Both groups revealed an increase in astrocyte–neuron interactions after memory induction. At 24 h after memory formation, the number of tripartite synapses returned to baseline levels in both groups. However, the total number of astrocyte–neuron interactions was significantly decreased in 5XFAD mice. Administration of Stattic, a STAT3 phosphorylation inhibitor, rescued the number of astrocyte–neuron interactions in 5XFAD mice. In conclusion, we suggest that a decreased number of astrocyte–neuron interactions may underlie memory impairment in the early stages of AD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenica Donatella Li Puma ◽  
Roberto Piacentini ◽  
Claudio Grassi

Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is a physiological mechanism contributing to hippocampal memory formation. Several studies associated altered hippocampal neurogenesis with aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, whether amyloid-β protein (Aβ)/tau accumulation impairs adult hippocampal neurogenesis and, consequently, the hippocampal circuitry, involved in memory formation, or altered neurogenesis is an epiphenomenon of AD neuropathology contributing negligibly to the AD phenotype, is, especially in humans, still debated. The detrimental effects of Aβ/tau on synaptic function and neuronal viability have been clearly addressed both in in vitro and in vivo experimental models. Until some years ago, studies carried out on in vitro models investigating the action of Aβ/tau on proliferation and differentiation of hippocampal neural stem cells led to contrasting results, mainly due to discrepancies arising from different experimental conditions (e.g., different cellular/animal models, different Aβ and/or tau isoforms, concentrations, and/or aggregation profiles). To date, studies investigating in situ adult hippocampal neurogenesis indicate severe impairment in most of transgenic AD mice; this impairment precedes by several months cognitive dysfunction. Using experimental tools, which only became available in the last few years, research in humans indicated that hippocampal neurogenesis is altered in cognitive declined individuals affected by either mild cognitive impairment or AD as well as in normal cognitive elderly with a significant inverse relationship between the number of newly formed neurons and cognitive impairment. However, despite that such information is available, the question whether impaired neurogenesis contributes to AD pathogenesis or is a mere consequence of Aβ/pTau accumulation is not definitively answered. Herein, we attempted to shed light on this complex and very intriguing topic by reviewing relevant literature on impairment of adult neurogenesis in mouse models of AD and in AD patients analyzing the temporal relationship between the occurrence of altered neurogenesis and the appearance of AD hallmarks and cognitive dysfunctions.


2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia Engmann ◽  
Tibor Hortobágyi ◽  
Andrew J. Thompson ◽  
Jennifer Guadagno ◽  
Claire Troakes ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 455-470
Author(s):  
Yuri I. Arshavsky

Although Alzheimer’s disease (AD) was described over a century ago, there are no effective approaches to its prevention and treatment. Such a slow progress is explained, at least in part, by our incomplete understanding of the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of AD. Here, I champion a hypothesis whereby AD is initiated on a disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) caused by either genetic or non-genetic risk factors. The BBB disruption leads to an autoimmune response against pyramidal neurons located in the allo- and neocortical structures involved in memory formation and storage. The response caused by the adaptive immune system is not strong enough to directly kill neurons but may be sufficient to make them selectively vulnerable to neurofibrillary pathology. This hypothesis is based on the recent data showing that memory formation is associated with epigenetic chromatin modifications and, therefore, may be accompanied by expression of memory-specific proteins recognized by the immune system as “non-self” antigens. The autoimmune hypothesis is testable, and I discuss potential ways for its experimental and clinical verification. If confirmed, this hypothesis can radically change therapeutic approaches to AD prevention and treatment.


Author(s):  
Tony James ◽  
Bartosz Kula ◽  
Seowon Choi ◽  
Shahzad S. Khan ◽  
Lane K. Bekar ◽  
...  

Nature ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 563 (7733) ◽  
pp. 639-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Hsiang Lee ◽  
Benjamin Siddoway ◽  
Gwendolyn E. Kaeser ◽  
Igor Segota ◽  
Richard Rivera ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony James ◽  
Bartosz Kula ◽  
Seowon Choi ◽  
Shahzad S. Khan ◽  
Lane K. Bekar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document