scholarly journals Carbon-Based Materials as Catalyst Supports for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: A Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
María José Valero-Romero ◽  
Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-Cano ◽  
José Palomo ◽  
José Rodríguez-Mirasol ◽  
Tomás Cordero

The use of carbon-based materials as catalyst supports for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) is thoroughly reviewed. The main factors to consider when using a carbonaceous catalyst support for FTS are first discussed. Then, the most relevant and recent literature on the topic from the last 2 decades is reviewed, classifying the different examples according to the carbon structure and shape. Some aspects such as the carbon textural properties, carbon support modification (functionalization and doping), catalyst preparation methods, metal particle size and location, catalyst stability and reducibility, the use of promoters, and the catalyst performance for FTS are summarized and discussed. Finally, the main conclusions, advantages, limitations, and perspectives of using carbon catalyst supports for FTS are outlined.

2013 ◽  
Vol 850-851 ◽  
pp. 120-123
Author(s):  
Hong Xia Zhao ◽  
Hai Liang Lü

The investigation has been conducted to establish the effect of preparation methods on the textural properties, the metal-support interaction of the Co/ZrO2 catalysts and consequently its influence on Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Coprecipitated Co/ZrO2 catalyst showed the strongest cobalt-zirconia interaction, the lowest reduction degree, and the lowest catalytic activity. Impregnated Co/ZrO2 catalyst showed the weakest cobalt-zirconia interaction, the highest reduction degree and the highest catalytic activity, while Co/ZrO2 catalyst prepared by directly impregnation Zr (OH)4 with cobalt nitrate solution were in the middle of CZC and CZI. The differences among the three catalysts could be ascribed to the different aging time of the support.


Catalysts ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 732
Author(s):  
José Antonio Díaz-López ◽  
Jordi Guilera ◽  
Martí Biset-Peiró ◽  
Dan Enache ◽  
Gordon Kelly ◽  
...  

The present work explores the technical feasibility of passivating a Co/γ-Al2O3 catalyst by atomic layer deposition (ALD) to reduce deactivation rate during Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS). Three samples of the reference catalyst were passivated using different numbers of ALD cycles (3, 6 and 10). Characterization results revealed that a shell of the passivating agent (Al2O3) grew around catalyst particles. This shell did not affect the properties of passivated samples below 10 cycles, in which catalyst reduction was hindered. Catalytic tests at 50% CO conversion evidenced that 3 and 6 ALD cycles increased catalyst stability without significantly affecting the catalytic performance, whereas 10 cycles caused blockage of the active phase that led to a strong decrease of catalytic activity. Catalyst deactivation modelling and tests at 60% CO conversion served to conclude that 3 to 6 ALD cycles reduced Co/γ-Al2O3 deactivation, so that the technical feasibility of this technique was proven in FTS.


Catalysts ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harrison Williams ◽  
Muthu K. Gnanamani ◽  
Gary Jacobs ◽  
Wilson D. Shafer ◽  
David Coulliette

Nearly a century ago, Fischer and Tropsch discovered a means of synthesizing organic compounds ranging from C1 to C70 by reacting carbon monoxide and hydrogen on a catalyst. Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) is now known as a pseudo-polymerization process taking a mixture of CO as H2 (also known as syngas) to produce a vast array of hydrocarbons, along with various small amounts of oxygenated materials. Despite the decades spent studying this process, it is still considered a black-box reaction with a mechanism that is still under debate. This investigation sought to improve our understanding by taking data from a series of experimental Fischer–Tropsch synthesis runs to build a computational model. The experimental runs were completed in an isothermal continuous stirred-tank reactor, allowing for comparison across a series of completed catalyst tests. Similar catalytic recipes were chosen so that conditional comparisons of pressure, temperature, SV, and CO/H2 could be made. Further, results from the output of the reactor that included the deviations in product selectivity, especially that of methane and CO2, were considered. Cobalt was chosen for these exams for its industrial relevance and respectfully clean process as it does not intrinsically undergo the water–gas shift (WGS). The primary focus of this manuscript was to compare runs using cobalt-based catalysts that varied in two oxide catalyst supports. The results were obtained by creating two differential equations, one for H2 and one for CO, in terms of products or groups of products. These were analyzed using sensitivity analysis (SA) to determine the products or groups that impact the model the most. The results revealed a significant difference in sensitivity between the two catalyst–support combinations. When the model equations for H2 and CO were split, the results indicated that the CO equation was significantly more sensitive to CO2 production than the H2 equation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 299 ◽  
pp. 20-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erling Rytter ◽  
Ata ul Rauf Salman ◽  
Nikolaos E. Tsakoumis ◽  
Rune Myrstad ◽  
Jia Yang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-320
Author(s):  
Jomar Livramento Barros Furtado ◽  
André Carvalho ◽  
Ricardo Vieira

2015 ◽  
Vol 278 ◽  
pp. 166-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanthana Klaigaew ◽  
Chanatip Samart ◽  
Chaiyan Chaiya ◽  
Yoshiharu Yoneyama ◽  
Noritatsu Tsubaki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document