scholarly journals Commentary: Long-Term Anatomical and Functional Survival of Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis in Congenital Aniridia

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yelin Yang ◽  
C. Maya Tong ◽  
Andrea Dahoud ◽  
Mona Harissi-Dagher
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariann Dyer ◽  
Alix De Faria ◽  
Gemma Julio ◽  
Juan Álvarez de Toledo ◽  
Rafael I. Barraquer ◽  
...  

Purpose: To analyze the long-term anatomical survival, functional survival, and complications of Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) in the eyes with congenital aniridia-associated keratopathy (AAK).Methods: A retrospective review of 12 eyes with congenital aniridia that underwent a Boston type 1 KPro surgery was conducted. A Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed. Anatomical and functional success criteria were KPro retention and a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤1.3 LogMAR (≥0.05 decimal) at the end of a follow-up period. Postoperative complications were recorded.Results: The mean preoperative BCVA was 2.1 ± 0.9 (range: 3.8–1) LogMAR, and glaucoma was a comorbidity in all the cases. Five years after the surgery, the overall retention rate was 10/12 (83.3%), and 50% had functional success. Only three (25%) of the 12 cases did not achieve a BCVA ≤1.3 LogMAR. The cumulative probability of anatomical success was 92, 79, and 79% after 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The cumulative probability of functional success was 57 and 46% after 1 and 5 years, respectively. The mean anatomical and functional survival time was 10 ± 1.3 (95% IC = 7.5–12.3 years) and 3.8 ± 0.9 years (95% IC = 1.8–5.8 years), respectively. The most common postoperative complication was retroprosthetic membrane (RPM) formation in 8/16 cases (66%). The mean number of complications per case was 2.4 ± 1.8 (0–6).Conclusions: The Boston type 1 KPro is a viable option for patients with AAK with good anatomical and functional long-term results. Glaucoma is an important preoperative condition that affects functional results. Retroprosthetic membrane formation seems to have a higher incidence in this condition.


Cornea ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1465-1473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Priddy ◽  
Ahmed Shalaby Bardan ◽  
Hadeel Sherif Tawfik ◽  
Christopher Liu

Author(s):  
Fernanda Pedreira Magalhães ◽  
Flavio Eduardo Hirai ◽  
Luciene Barbosa de Sousa ◽  
Lauro Augusto de Oliveira

Cornea ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Shah ◽  
Albert Y. Cheung ◽  
Edward J. Holland

Ophthalmology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 121 (11) ◽  
pp. 2159-2164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Divya Srikumaran ◽  
Beatriz Munoz ◽  
Anthony J. Aldave ◽  
James V. Aquavella ◽  
Sadeer B. Hannush ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (21) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
MIRIAM E. TUCKER

2006 ◽  
Vol 44 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Várkonyi ◽  
É Börcsök ◽  
R Takács ◽  
R Róka ◽  
C Lengyel ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-522
Author(s):  
Jeyakumar S ◽  
Jagatheesan Alagesan ◽  
T.S. Muthukumar

Background: Frozen shoulder is disorder of the connective tissue that limits the normal Range of motion of the shoulder in diabetes, frozen shoulder is thought to be caused by changes to the collagen in the shoulder joint as a result of long term Hypoglycemia. Mobilization is a therapeutic movement of the joint. The goal is to restore normal joint motion and rhythm. The use of mobilization with movement for peripheral joints was developed by mulligan. This technique combines a sustained application of manual technique “gliding” force to the joint with concurrent physiologic motion of joint, either actively or passively. This study aims to find out the effects of mobilization with movement and end range mobilization in frozen shoulder in Type I diabetics. Materials and Methods: 30 subjects both male and female, suffering with shoulder pain and clinically diagnosed with frozen shoulder was recruited for the study and divided into two groups with 15 patients each based on convenient sampling method. Group A patients received mobilization with movement and Group B patients received end range mobilization for three weeks. The outcome measurements were SPADI, Functional hand to back scale, abduction range of motion using goniometer and VAS. Results: The mean values of all parameters showed significant differences in group A as compared to group B in terms of decreased pain, increased abduction range and other outcome measures. Conclusion: Based on the results it has been concluded that treating the type 1 diabetic patient with frozen shoulder, mobilization with movement exercise shows better results than end range mobilization in reducing pain and increase functional activities and mobility in frozen shoulder.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document