scholarly journals Limited Add-On Effects of Unilateral and Bilateral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Visuo-Motor Grip Force Tracking Task Training Outcome in Chronic Stroke. A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedikt Taud ◽  
Robert Lindenberg ◽  
Robert Darkow ◽  
Jasmin Wevers ◽  
Dorothee Höfflin ◽  
...  

Background: This randomized controlled trial investigated if uni- and bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the motor cortex can enhance the effects of visuo-motor grip force tracking task training and transfer to clinical assessments of upper extremity motor function.Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial, 40 chronic stroke patients underwent 5 days of visuo-motor grip force tracking task training of the paretic hand with either unilateral or bilateral (N = 15/group) or placebo tDCS (N = 10). Immediate and long-term (3 months) effects on training outcome and motor recovery (Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer, UE-FM, Wolf Motor Function Test, and WMFT) were investigated.Results: Trained task performance significantly improved independently of tDCS in a curvilinear fashion. In the anodal stimulation group UE-FM scores were higher than in the sham group at day 5 (adjusted mean difference: 2.6, 95%CI: 0.6–4.5, p = 0.010) and at 3 months follow up (adjusted mean difference: 2.8, 95%CI: 0.8–4.7, p = 0.006). Neither training alone, nor the combination of training and tDCS improved WMFT performance.Conclusions: Visuo-motor grip force tracking task training can facilitate recovery of upper extremity function. Only minimal add-on effects of anodal but not dual tDCS were observed.Clinical Trial Registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?recrs=&cond=&term=NCT01969097&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=, identifier: NCT01969097, retrospectively registered on 25/10/2013.

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paweł Kiper ◽  
Michela Agostini ◽  
Carlos Luque-Moreno ◽  
Paolo Tonin ◽  
Andrea Turolla

Objectives. To study whether the reinforced feedback in virtual environment (RFVE) is more effective than traditional rehabilitation (TR) for the treatment of upper limb motor function after stroke, regardless of stroke etiology (i.e., ischemic, hemorrhagic).Design. Randomized controlled trial.Participants. Forty-four patients affected by stroke.Intervention. The patients were randomized into two groups: RFVE (N=23) and TR (N=21), and stratified according to stroke etiology. The RFVE treatment consisted of multidirectional exercises providing augmented feedback provided by virtual reality, while in the TR treatment the same exercises were provided without augmented feedbacks.Outcome Measures. Fugl-Meyer upper extremity scale (F-M UE), Functional Independence Measure scale (FIM), and kinematics parameters (speed, time, and peak).Results. The F-M UE (P=0.030), FIM (P=0.021), time (P=0.008), and peak (P=0.018), were significantly higher in the RFVE group after treatment, but not speed (P=0.140). The patients affected by hemorrhagic stroke significantly improved FIM (P=0.031), time (P=0.011), and peak (P=0.020) after treatment, whereas the patients affected by ischemic stroke improved significantly only speed (P=0.005) when treated by RFVE.Conclusion. These results indicated that some poststroke patients may benefit from RFVE program for the recovery of upper limb motor function. This trial is registered withNCT01955291.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document