scholarly journals Analysis of Adaptive Olaparib Resistance Effects on Cisplatin Sensitivity in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambikai Gajan ◽  
Ashapurna Sarma ◽  
Seongho Kim ◽  
Katherine Gurdziel ◽  
Gen Sheng Wu ◽  
...  

Poly-(ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and platinum-based drugs are promising therapies for triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) with BRCA1 or BRCA2 loss. PARPi(s) show better efficacies when combined with platinum-based therapy, however, acquisition of PARPi resistance has been linked with co-resistance to platinum-based drugs. Here, we show that TNBCs with constitutively hyperactivated PARP-1 display greater tolerances for the PARPi olaparib and cisplatin, and respond synergistically to olaparib/cisplatin combinations with increased cytotoxicity. Regardless of BRCA1 and PARP-1 activity status, upon gaining olaparib resistance (OlaR), OlaR MDA-MB-468 (BRCA1 wild-type) and SUM1315 (BRCA1 mutant) TNBC cells retain cisplatin sensitivities of their isogenic parental counterparts. OlaR TNBC cells express decreased levels of PARP-1 and Pol η, a translesion-synthesis polymerase important in platinum-induced interstrand crosslink repair. Although native RAD51 recombinase levels are unaffected, anti-RAD51 immunoreactive low molecular weight sbands are exclusively detected in OlaR cells. Despite normal BRCA1, RAD51 foci formation/recruitment to double-strand breaks are impaired in OlaR MDA-MB-468 cells, suggesting homologous-recombination impairment. RNA-seq and pathway analysis of cisplatin-affected genes revealed enrichment of G2/M cell cycle regulation and DNA repair pathways in parental and OlaR MDA-MB-468 cells whereas parental and OlaR SUM1315 cells showed enrichment of inflammatory stress response pathways associated with TNFR1/2, TWEAK and IL-17 signaling. These data show that TNBC models with wild type versus mutant BRCA1 exhibit differences in CDDP-induced cellular response pathways, however, the CDDP-induced signaling responses remain stable across the isogenic models of OlaR from the same lineage. These data also show that adaptive OlaR does not automatically promote cisplatin resistance, implicating the potential benefit of platinum-based therapy for OlaR TNBCs.

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Cataldo ◽  
Sandra Romero-Cordoba ◽  
Ilaria Plantamura ◽  
Giulia Cosentino ◽  
Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda ◽  
...  

Introduction: Chemotherapy is still the standard of care for triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). Here, we investigated miR-302b as a therapeutic tool to enhance cisplatin sensitivity in vivo and unraveled the molecular mechanism. Materials and Methods: TNBC-xenografted mice were treated with miR-302b or control, alone or with cisplatin. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis and independent-validation of Integrin Subunit Alpha 6 (ITGA6) expression was assessed on mice tumor samples. Silencing of ITGA6 was performed to evaluate cisplatin response in vitro. Further, potential transcription factors of ITGA6 (E2F transcription facor 1 (E2F1), E2F transcription factor 2 (E2F2), and Yin Yang 1 (YY1)) were explored to define the miRNA molecular mechanism. The miR-302b expression was also assessed in TNBC patients treated with chemotherapy. Results: The miR–302b-cisplatin combination significantly impaired tumor growth versus the control through indirect ITGA6 downregulation. Indeed, ITGA6 was downmodulated in mice treated with miR-302b–cisplatin, and ITGA6 silencing increased drug sensitivity in TNBC cells. In silico analyses and preclinical assays pointed out the regulatory role of the E2F family and YY1 on ITGA6 expression under miR-302b–cisplatin treatment. Finally, miR-302b enrichment correlated with better overall survival in 118 TNBC patients. Conclusion: MiR-302b can be exploited as a new therapeutic tool to improve the response to chemotherapy, modulating the E2F family, YY1, and ITGA6 expression. Moreover, miR-302b could be defined as a new prognostic factor in TNBC patients.


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana Usanova ◽  
Andrea Piée-Staffa ◽  
Ulrike Sied ◽  
Jürgen Thomale ◽  
Astrid Schneider ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea M. Pesch ◽  
Nicole Hirsh ◽  
Anna R. Michmerhuizen ◽  
Benjamin C. Chandler ◽  
Kari Wilder-Romans ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Liu ◽  
Kan Wu ◽  
Dan Zheng ◽  
Chuanxu Luo ◽  
Yu Fan ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundPoly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown promising results in metastatic triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this drug in patients with advanced or metastatic TNBC.MethodsOn August 2020, we searched all published phase II/III clinical studies of PARP inhibitors in advanced/metastatic TNBC patients. Data were extracted independently by two authors and analyzed using Review Manager software version 5.3. End points included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events.ResultsTen clinical trials were identified, with a total of 1495 patients included. Pooled analyses showed that the addition of PARP inhibitors could provide a significant improvement of ORR (risk ratio [RR]=2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14–3.50, p=0.02) and PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.68, 95 %Cl: 0.59-0.77, p<0.0001) compared to chemotherapy in the whole population. In subgroup analysis, BRCA mutated patients have a higher objective response to PARP inhibitor, with a RR of 2.85 (95%CI: 1.34–6.06, p=0.007) compared to BRCA wild-type patients. However, no significant differences in ORR were observed between homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) positive and non-HRD subgroup (RR=1.82, 95%CI: 0.81–4.08, p=0.14). Hematologic toxicities were common adverse events of PARP inhibitors.ConclusionsPARP inhibitors are an effective option for the treatment of advanced or metastatic TNBC patients. BRCA mutated patients could derive more benefits from PARP inhibitors when compared to BRCA wild-type patients. In clinical application, hematological toxicity related to PARP inhibitors should be monitored regularly.


Oncotarget ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (45) ◽  
pp. 4178-4194
Author(s):  
Bhumika Wadhwa ◽  
Masroor Paddar ◽  
Sameer Khan ◽  
Sameer Mir ◽  
Philip A.Clarke ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea M. Pesch ◽  
Benjamin C. Chandler ◽  
Anna R. Michmerhuizen ◽  
Nicole Hirsh ◽  
Kari Wilder-Romans ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document