scholarly journals The Role of Approximate Number System in Different Mathematics Skills Across Grades

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Cai ◽  
Linni Zhang ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Wei Wei ◽  
George K. Georgiou
2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1820-1829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea L. Patalano ◽  
Jason R. Saltiel ◽  
Laura Machlin ◽  
Hilary Barth

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael E. Núñez ◽  
Francesco d'Errico ◽  
Russell D. Gray ◽  
Andrea Bender

Abstract Clarke and Beck's defense of the theoretical construct “approximate number system” (ANS) is flawed in serious ways – from biological misconceptions to mathematical naïveté. The authors misunderstand behavioral/psychological technical concepts, such as numerosity and quantical cognition, which they disdain as “exotic.” Additionally, their characterization of rational numbers is blind to the essential role of symbolic reference in the emergence of number.


2017 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tali Leibovich ◽  
Naama Katzin ◽  
Moti Salti ◽  
Avishai Henik

AbstractIn response to the commentaries, we have refined our suggested model and discussed ways in which the model could be further expanded. In this context, we have elaborated on the role of specific continuous magnitudes. We have also found it important to devote a section to evidence considered the “smoking gun” of the approximate number system theory, including cross-modal studies, animal studies, and so forth. Lastly, we suggested some ways in which the scientific community can promote more transparent and collaborative research by using an open science approach, sharing both raw data and stimuli. We thank the contributors for their enlightening comments and look forward to future developments in the field.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 737-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Wagner Fuhs ◽  
Nicole M. McNeil ◽  
Ken Kelley ◽  
Connor O’Rear ◽  
Michael Villano

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tali Leibovich-Raveh ◽  
Simon Greg

How children learn basic skills such as discriminating between different quantities and counting? According to the dominant Approximate Number System (ANS) theory,humans are born with the ability to discriminate between discrete quantities (i.e.,numbers). Accordingly, early math curriculum should focus on discrete quantities. This theory guides many early-math curricula worldwide. We provide a review of empirical evidence challenging the ANS theory and introduced a more recent theoretical framework, the Approximate Magnitude System (AMS). This theory suggests that continuous magnitudes (such as area, density, volume, etc.) are more intuitive and acquired earlier then the ability to understand numbers. Using examples from early math education practices, we emphasize and demonstrate the potential benefits of taking the AMS approach and using magnitudes as a scaffolding for understanding numbers and more complex math concepts. Insights gained from studies that combines both cognitive psychology and educational research, with the active participation and contribution of early-math teachers, may be of assistance to both cognitive psychologists, interested in how math abilities develop, and to educators, looking to improve math curriculum. We hope that this article will inspire others to consider research in this direction and start a productive discussion on the role of continuous magnitudes in teaching math.


2020 ◽  
pp. 153-168
Author(s):  
Ellen Peters

This chapter, “Discriminating Numbers Allows for Better Decisions,” focuses on the role of our intuitive sense of numbers in decision making. Humans have evolved beyond these intuitions about quantities to know modern numeric abstractions. However, the evolutionarily old approximate number system (ANS) nonetheless remains pivotal to human decisions. Just as non-human animals use the proportional reasoning and estimation skills that come from the ANS, so do humans. The chapter introduces three systematic properties of the ANS that can explain differences in how people make decisions. These numeric intuitions, independent of objective ability, relate to having superior numeric memory and (usually) more accurate perceptions of value. Sometimes, however, the ANS’s reliance on proportional reasoning can produce what looks like worse decisions. The Appendix to this chapter describes ANS measures.


Author(s):  
Camilla Gilmore

This article reviews recent research exploring children’s abilities to perform approximate arithmetic with non-symbolic and symbolic quantities, and considers what role this ability might play in mathematics achievement. It has been suggested that children can use their approximate number system (ANS) to solve approximate arithmetic problems before they have been taught exact arithmetic in school. Recent studies provide evidence that preschool children can add, subtract, multiply, and divide non-symbolic quantities represented as dot arrays. Children can also use their ANS to perform simple approximate arithmetic with non-symbolic quantities presented in different modalities (e.g. sequences of tones) or even with symbolic representations of number. This article reviews these studies, and consider whether children’s performance can be explained through the use of alternative non-arithmetical strategies. Finally, it discusses the potential role of this ability in the learning of formal symbolic mathematics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document