scholarly journals An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin A. Parris ◽  
Michael G. Wadsley ◽  
Nabil Hasshim ◽  
Abdelmalek Benattayallah ◽  
Maria Augustinova ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 149-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Montserrat Zurrón ◽  
Marta Ramos-Goicoa ◽  
Fernando Díaz

With the aim of establishing the temporal locus of the semantic conflict in color-word Stroop and emotional Stroop phenomena, we analyzed the Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) elicited by nonwords, incongruent and congruent color words, colored words with positive and negative emotional valence, and colored words with neutral valence. The incongruent, positive, negative, and neutral stimuli produced interference in the behavioral response to the color of the stimuli. The P150/N170 amplitude was sensitive to the semantic equivalence of both dimensions of the congruent color words. The P3b amplitude was smaller in response to incongruent color words and to positive, negative, and neutral colored words than in response to the congruent color words and colored nonwords. There were no differences in the ERPs induced in response to colored words with positive, negative, and neutral valence. Therefore, the P3b amplitude was sensitive to interference from the semantic content of the incongruent, positive, negative, and neutral words in the color-response task, independently of the emotional content of the colored words. In addition, the P3b amplitude was smaller in response to colored words with positive, negative, and neutral valence than in response to the incongruent color words. Overall, these data indicate that the temporal locus of the semantic conflict generated by the incongruent color words (in the color-word Stroop task) and by colored words with positive, negative, and neutral valence (in the emotional Stroop task) appears to occur in the range 300–450 ms post-stimulus.


Cortex ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 1248-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liane Kaufmann ◽  
Anja Ischebeck ◽  
Elisabeth Weiss ◽  
Florian Koppelstaetter ◽  
Christian Siedentopf ◽  
...  

NeuroImage ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 888-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liane Kaufmann ◽  
Florian Koppelstaetter ◽  
Margarete Delazer ◽  
Christian Siedentopf ◽  
Paul Rhomberg ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. S239
Author(s):  
Akitoshi Ogawa ◽  
Takeshi Asamizuya ◽  
Ken-ichi Ueno ◽  
Atsushi Iriki

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 325-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Araneda ◽  
Laurent Renier ◽  
Laurence Dricot ◽  
Monique Decat ◽  
Daniela Ebner-Karestinos ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 35-41
Author(s):  
Janardhanan C. Narayanaswamy ◽  
Dania Jose ◽  
Sri Mahavir Agarwal ◽  
Sunil V. Kalmady ◽  
Upasana Baruah ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Benjamin A. Parris ◽  
Nabil Hasshim ◽  
Michael Wadsley ◽  
Maria Augustinova ◽  
Ludovic Ferrand

AbstractDespite instructions to ignore the irrelevant word in the Stroop task, it robustly influences the time it takes to identify the color, leading to performance decrements (interference) or enhancements (facilitation). The present review addresses two questions: (1) What levels of processing contribute to Stroop effects; and (2) Where does attentional selection occur? The methods that are used in the Stroop literature to measure the candidate varieties of interference and facilitation are critically evaluated and the processing levels that contribute to Stroop effects are discussed. It is concluded that the literature does not provide clear evidence for a distinction between conflicting and facilitating representations at phonological, semantic and response levels (together referred to as informational conflict), because the methods do not currently permit their isolated measurement. In contrast, it is argued that the evidence for task conflict as being distinct from informational conflict is strong and, thus, that there are at least two loci of attentional selection in the Stroop task. Evidence suggests that task conflict occurs earlier, has a different developmental trajectory and is independently controlled which supports the notion of a separate mechanism of attentional selection. The modifying effects of response modes and evidence for Stroop effects at the level of response execution are also discussed. It is argued that multiple studies claiming to have distinguished response and semantic conflict have not done so unambiguously and that models of Stroop task performance need to be modified to more effectively account for the loci of Stroop effects.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Hoogeveen ◽  
Lukas Snoek ◽  
Michiel van Elk

AbstractIn the current preregistered fMRI study, we investigated the relationship between religiosity and behavioral and neural mechanisms of conflict processing, as a conceptual replication of the study by Inzlicht et al. (2009). Participants (N = 193) performed a gender-Stroop task and afterwards completed standardized measures to assess their religiosity. As expected, the task induced cognitive conflict at the behavioral level and at a neural level this was reflected in increased activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). However, individual differences in religiosity were not related to performance on the Stroop task as measured in accuracy and interference effects, nor to neural markers of response conflict (correct responses vs. errors) or informational conflict (congruent vs. incongruent stimuli). Overall, we obtained moderate to strong evidence in favor of the null hypotheses that religiosity is unrelated to cognitive conflict sensitivity. We discuss the implications for the neuroscience of religion and emphasize the importance of designing studies that more directly implicate religious concepts and behaviors in an ecologically valid manner.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document