scholarly journals Does the Person-Centered Care Model Support the Needs of Long-Term Care Residents With Serious Mental Illness and Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities?

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth P. Howard ◽  
Lynn Martin ◽  
George A. Heckman ◽  
John N. Morris

Person-centered care approaches continue to evolve in long-term care (LTC). At the same time, these settings have faced increased challenges due to a more diverse and complex population, including persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and serious mental illness (SMI). This study examined the mental, social, and physical wellbeing of residents with different diagnoses, within a person-centered care model. It was hypothesized that individual wellbeing would be comparable among all residents, regardless of primary diagnosis. The study cohort was drawn from all admissions to long-term care facilities in the USA from 2011 to 2013. Data are based on admission, 3 and 6 month follow-up Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments. The groups examined included: schizophrenia, other psychotic disorders, IDD, dementia, and all others (i.e., none of the above diagnoses). The wellbeing outcomes were depression (mental), pain (physical), and behaviors (social). All residents experienced improvements in pain and depression, though the group without the examined diagnoses experienced the greatest gains. Behaviors were most prevalent among those with psychotic disorders; though marked improvements were noted over time. Improvement also was noted among persons with dementia. Behavior worsened over time for the three other groups. In particular, those with IDD experienced the highest level of worsening at 3-month follow-up, and continued to worsen. The results suggest person-centered care in US nursing homes provides the necessary foundation to promote mental and physical wellbeing in persons with complex needs, but less so for social wellbeing.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 882-882
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Howard ◽  
Tammy Retalic

Abstract Achieving institutional goal of full, person-centered care was encumbered by an outdated structural “hospital model” at one long-term care facility that undertook building renovations, transforming long hallways into “neighborhood” of compact households. Quality of Life Survey and Long-term Care Minimum Data Set generated data at baseline and 1-year follow-up, comparing renovated(RU) and non-renovated unit(NRU) residents (n=36) to evaluate achievement of person-centered care. RU residents indicating they could “eat when I want” increased 75% to 81% at follow-up and decreased 17% for NRU residents. Sixty-seven percent of RU residents reported bathing “when they want” in contrast to 40% of NRU residents. Most RU residents agreed, “staff act on my suggestions.”More RU residents (68% vs 53%) agreed: “I spend time with other like-minded residents” and more RU residents (86% vs 43%) reported opportunity to explore new skills, interests. RU residents more often reported (50% vs 37%) “people ask for my help or advice.” Similar differences were observed with “it is easy to make friends here,” 67% RU residents responding affirmatively. RU residents reporting “feeling down” improved, moving from 46% to 50% disagreeing with this item with while increased number of NRU residents (18% to 22%) reported “feeling down” at follow-up.Improvement with independent performance of bed mobility, transfer, walking, and dressing among RU residents was observed while NRU residents had decreased percentages of independence. Evaluation of resident outcomes demonstrated improvement with personal choice, activities, personal relationships, functional independence and mood. Physical unit renovations appear to enhance implementation of person-centered care model.


Author(s):  
Anabelle Viau-Guay ◽  
Marie Bellemare ◽  
Isabelle Feillou ◽  
Louis Trudel ◽  
Johanne Desrosiers ◽  
...  

RÉSUMÉLes approches de soins centrées sur la personne sont de plus en plus recommandées en vue d’améliorer la qualité des soins de longue durée. Au Québec (Canada), l’approche relationnelle de soins a été implantée dans plusieurs établissements. Cette étude porte sur le point de vue des soignants formés sur l’utilité de cette approche ainsi que sur leur capacité à la transférer en pratique. Des questionnaires comportant des questions ouvertes ont été administrés un mois après la formation (n=392). Les réponses ont été catégorisées selon une approche qualitative. Les répondants perçoivent que certaines dimensions de l’approche sont hors de leur portée ou s’opposent à leurs croyances. Ils rapportent des pressions liées aux contraintes temporelles, à leurs collègues ainsi qu’aux familles des résidents. Ces résultats indiquent que la formation ne suffit pas à transformer les pratiques. Il faut également agir sur les croyances des individus ainsi que sur les situations de travail


Healthcare ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronique Boscart ◽  
Meaghan Davey ◽  
Jenny Ploeg ◽  
George Heckman ◽  
Sherry Dupuis ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 160-160
Author(s):  
Kirsten Corazzini ◽  
Michael Lepore

Abstract Measuring what matters most to residents, relatives and staff in residential long-term care settings is critical, yet underdeveloped in our predominantly frailty and deficits-focused measurement frameworks. The Worldwide Elements to Harmonize Research in Long-Term Care Living Environments (WE-THRIVE) consortium has previously prioritized measurement concepts in the areas of care outcomes, workforce and staffing, person-centered care, and care context. These concepts include knowing the resident and what matters most to the resident, and outcomes such as quality of life, and personhood. We present findings of our currently recommended measures, including both general population and dementia-specific measures, such as the Person-Centered Care Assessment Tool (PCAT), the Personhood in Dementia Questionnaire (PDQ), and the ICEpop CAPability Measure for Older People (ICECAP-O). We also describe remaining gaps in existing measures that will need to be addressed to fully specify common data elements focused on measuring what matters most to residents, relatives and staff.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 598-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten N. Corazzini ◽  
Ruth A. Anderson ◽  
Barbara J. Bowers ◽  
Charlene H. Chu ◽  
David Edvardsson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document