Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment efficacy of lateral spinal stenosis through the decompression of the nerve root under a multiple planar endoscope.Methods: From January 2017 to March 2019, 52 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis or lumbar spinal stenosis combined with intervertebral disc herniation had been treated via transforaminal approach spinal endoscopy. Our study retrospectively analyzed the treatment outcome. All patients experienced complications with different degrees of facet joint hyperplasia and ligamentum flavum hyperplasia and hypertrophy. Some patients suffered disc herniation. All patients were treated with percutaneous transforaminal approach multiple planar endoscopic decompression. The visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were compared before and after the operation, as were the horizontal foramen areas of the medial margins of the upper and lower pedicles of the vertebral arch. The treatment effectiveness was evaluated.Results: VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved at postoperative 3 days, 3 months, 6 months, and the last follow-up (P < 0.05). The area of the intervertebral foramen was 422.5 ± 159.2 mm2 preoperatively and 890.8 ± 367.7 mm2 postoperatively, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).Conclusion: Percutaneous transforaminal approach multiple planar endoscopic decompression could achieve an accurate and effective decompression of the lumbar lateral spinal canal. This procedure has good short-term effects, and is especially suitable for elderly patients.

Download Full-text

Radiographic outcomes of endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis

Neurosurgical FOCUS ◽

10.3171/2019.2.focus18617 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 46 (5) ◽

pp. E10 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Siri Sahib Khalsa ◽

Hyeun Sung Kim ◽

Ravindra Singh ◽

Osama Nezar Kashlan

Keyword(s):

Spinal Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽

Facet Joint ◽

Volumetric Analysis ◽

Facet Joints ◽

Bone Removal ◽

Endoscopic Decompression ◽

Radiographic Outcomes ◽

Lateral Recess Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Spinal

OBJECTIVELumbar central stenosis can theoretically be decompressed with minimal bone removal via an endoscopic approach. Although multiple studies have demonstrated an adequate radiographic decompression, none has quantified the volume of bone removal after endoscopic decompression. The objective of this study was to quantify the 3D volume of bone removed from the lamina and facet joints during endoscopic decompression for lumbar central and lateral recess stenosis.METHODSThis retrospective study included adults with lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent endoscopic decompression of a single level or 2 noncontiguous lumbar levels. Central stenosis on MRI was graded preoperatively and postoperatively using the Schizas scale. A computer program was developed in MATLAB to semiautomatically perform a 3D volumetric analysis of preoperative and postoperative lumbar CT scans. The volumetric percentage of bone removed from the lamina and facet joints ipsilateral and contralateral to the side of approach was quantified.RESULTSNineteen patients with 21 treated lumbar levels were included in the study. Preoperatively, the number of levels with Schizas stenosis grades B, C, and D were 5, 12, and 4, respectively. Stenosis grades improved postoperatively to grades A, B, C, and D for 17, 3, 1, and 0 levels, respectively. All levels improved by at least 1 stenosis grade. The volumetric percentage of laminar bone removed was 15.5% (95% CI 11.2%–19.8%, p < 0.001) from the ipsilateral lamina and 8.8% (95% CI 5.7%–11.8%, p < 0.001) from the contralateral lamina. The percentage of facet joint resection was 5.3% (95% CI 4.2%–6.4%, p < 0.001) and 4.3% (95% CI 2.2%–6.4%, p < 0.001) for the ipsilateral and contralateral facet joints, respectively. Average pain scores, as measured by the visual analog scale, improved from 7.9 preoperatively to 2.2 by 3–10 months postoperatively (p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSEndoscopic lumbar decompression achieves improvement in the radiographic grade of lumbar central stenosis with minimal bone removal from the lamina and facet joints. Future prospective studies are needed to validate the findings of this study with more comprehensive clinical outcomes.

Download Full-text

Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: Is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient?

10.21203/rs.3.rs-25624/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Bin Zhang ◽

Qingquan Kong ◽

Yuqing Yan ◽

Pin Feng

Keyword(s):

Spinal Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽

Operation Time ◽

Decompression Surgery ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Endoscopic Decompression ◽

Dural Sac ◽

Transforaminal Approach ◽

The Mean ◽

Lumbar Spinal

Abstract Background: At present, few percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression surgery has been reported to solve central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS). Whether endoscopic decompression through lateral transforaminal approach decompression is sufficient for degenerative CLSS.Methods: This retrospective study included 47 cases of CLSS patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic decompression through a bilateral transforaminal approach. Clinical outcomes such as ODI, back and leg VAS, the Macnab criteria were evaluated. Surgical results including operative time, postoperative hospital stay, recurrence, and surgical complications were also studied. Radiologically, lumbar stability was assessed and lumbar dural sac dimension was compared preoperatively and postoperatively.Results：All 47 patients were followed up. The average follow-up period was 24.5 months. The average operation time was 116 minutes. The mean VAS of leg and back pain, and the mean ODI improved from 7.81, 2.53, and 77.03% at baseline to a final 1.94 (P=0.00), 2.47 (P=0.71), and 19.40 % (P=0.00), respectively. According to the Macnab criteria, 97.9% of patients achieved excellent and good results. There were 2 cases of dura tear and 3 cases of transient postoperative dysthesia. The cross sectional area of the dural sac was significantly enlargement at the last fellow up (74.28±13.08 mm2 vs.104.91±12.40 mm2, P=0.00).Conclusions: Except for the main pathogenic factors on the dorsal side of the dural sac, percutaneous endoscopic decompression through a bilateral transforaminal approach is sufficient for CLSS. It is a feasible, safe, and clinically effective minimally invasive procedure.

Download Full-text

Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient?

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽

10.1186/s12891-020-03722-3 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Bin Zhang ◽

Qingquan Kong ◽

Yuqing Yan ◽

Pin Feng

Keyword(s):

Spinal Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽

Operation Time ◽

Decompression Surgery ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Endoscopic Decompression ◽

Dural Sac ◽

Transforaminal Approach ◽

The Mean ◽

Lumbar Spinal

Abstract Background At present, few reports of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression surgery have been reported to solve central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS). Is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach decompression sufficient for degenerative CLSS? Methods This retrospective study included 47 cases of CLSS patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach. Clinical outcomes such as ODI, back and leg VAS, the Macnab criteria were evaluated. Surgical results including operative time, postoperative hospital stay, recurrence, and surgical complications were also studied. Radiologically, lumbar stability was assessed and lumbar dural sac dimension was compared preoperatively and postoperatively. Results All 47 patients were followed up. The average follow-up period was 24.5 months. The average operation time was 116 min. The mean VAS of leg and back pain, and the mean ODI improved from 7.81, 2.53, and 77.03% at baseline to a final 1.94 (P = 0.00), 2.47 (P = 0.71), and 19.40% (P = 0.00), respectively. According to the Macnab criteria, 97.9% of patients achieved excellent and good results. There were 2 cases of dural tear and 3 cases of transient postoperative dysthesia. The cross-sectional area of the dural sac was significant enlargement at the last fellow up (74.28 ± 13.08 mm2 vs.104.91 ± 12.40 mm2, P = 0.00). Conclusions Except for the main pathogenic factors on the dorsal side of the dural sac, percutaneous endoscopic decompression through a bilateral transforaminal approach is sufficient for CLSS. It is a feasible, safe, and clinically effective minimally invasive procedure.

Download Full-text

Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: Is endoscopic decompression through lateral transforaminal approach sufficient?

10.21203/rs.3.rs-25624/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Bin Zhang ◽

Qingquan Kong ◽

Yuqing Yan ◽

Pin Feng

Keyword(s):

Spinal Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽

Operation Time ◽

Decompression Surgery ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Endoscopic Decompression ◽

Dural Sac ◽

Transforaminal Approach ◽

The Mean ◽

Lumbar Spinal

Abstract Background: At present, no percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression surgery has been reported to solve central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS). Whether endoscopic decompression through lateral transforaminal approach decompression is sufficient for degenerative CLSS. Methods: This retrospective study included 47 cases of CLSS patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic decompression through a bilateral transforaminal approach. Clinical outcomes such as ODI, back and leg VAS, the Macnab criteria were evaluated. Surgical results including operative time, postoperative hospital stay, recurrence, and surgical complications were also studied. Radiologically, lumbar stability was assessed and lumbar dural sac dimension was compared preoperatively and postoperatively. Results ： All 47 patients were followed up. The average follow-up period was 24.5 months. The average operation time was 116 minutes. The mean VAS of leg and back pain, and the mean ODI improved from 7.81, 2.53, and 77.03% at baseline to a final 1.94 (P=0.00), 2.47 (P=0.71), and 19.40 % (P=0.00), respectively. According to the Macnab criteria, 97.9% of patients achieved excellent and good results. There were 2 cases of dura tear and 3 cases of transient postoperative dysthesia. The cross sectional area of the dural sac was significantly enlargement at the last fellow up (74.28±13.08 mm 2 vs. 104.91±12.40 mm 2 , P=0.00). Conclusions: Except for the main pathogenic factors on the dorsal side of the dural sac, percutaneous endoscopic decompression through a bilateral transforaminal approach is sufficient for CLSS. It is a feasible, safe, and clinically effective minimally invasive procedure.

Download Full-text

Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: Is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient?

10.21203/rs.3.rs-25624/v3 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Bin Zhang ◽

Qingquan Kong ◽

Yuqing Yan ◽

Pin Feng

Keyword(s):

Spinal Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽

Operation Time ◽

Decompression Surgery ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Endoscopic Decompression ◽

Dural Sac ◽

Transforaminal Approach ◽

The Mean ◽

Lumbar Spinal

Abstract Background: At present, few reports of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression surgery have been reported to solve central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS). Is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach decompression sufficient for degenerative CLSS?Methods: This retrospective study included 47 cases of CLSS patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach. Clinical outcomes such as ODI, back and leg VAS, the Macnab criteria were evaluated. Surgical results including operative time, postoperative hospital stay, recurrence, and surgical complications were also studied. Radiologically, lumbar stability was assessed and lumbar dural sac dimension was compared preoperatively and postoperatively.Results：All 47 patients were followed up. The average follow-up period was 24.5 months. The average operation time was 116 minutes. The mean VAS of leg and back pain, and the mean ODI improved from 7.81, 2.53, and 77.03% at baseline to a final 1.94 (P=0.00), 2.47 (P=0.71), and 19.40 % (P=0.00), respectively. According to the Macnab criteria, 97.9% of patients achieved excellent and good results. There were 2 cases of dural tear and 3 cases of transient postoperative dysthesia. The cross-sectional area of the dural sac was significant enlargement at the last fellow up (74.28±13.08 mm2 vs.104.91±12.40 mm2, P=0.00).Conclusions: Except for the main pathogenic factors on the dorsal side of the dural sac, percutaneous endoscopic decompression through a bilateral transforaminal approach is sufficient for CLSS. It is a feasible, safe, and clinically effective minimally invasive procedure.

Download Full-text