scholarly journals Baseline shifts do not predict attentional modulation of target processing during feature-based visual attention

Author(s):  
Sean P. Fannon
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 1163-1163
Author(s):  
A. Byers ◽  
J. Serences

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey W. Stuart ◽  
Wendy N. Barsdell ◽  
Ross H. Day

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 529-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Papathomas ◽  
Zoltán Vidnyánsky ◽  
Sharon Sally

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Mingxi Ai ◽  
Yongfang Xie ◽  
Zhaohui Tang ◽  
Jin Zhang ◽  
Weihua Gui

2009 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. 135-142
Author(s):  
ANDRES BUEHLMANN ◽  
GUSTAVO DECO

Experimental and theoretical work has related rate modulation and gamma synchronization modulation to visual attention. Here, we review briefly some of the influential experiments and our modeling work on the subject. We show that attentional modulation generally gets stronger along the visual pathway and that rate and gamma synchronization can vary independently of each other. Moreover, we show that in a model system, reaction times are faster in the presence of gamma synchronization. This suggests behavioral relevance for gamma synchronization.


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viola S. Störmer ◽  
Shu-Chen Li ◽  
Hauke R. Heekeren ◽  
Ulman Lindenberger

Declines in selective attention are one of the sources contributing to age-related impairments in a broad range of cognitive functions. Most previous research on mechanisms underlying older adults' selection deficits has studied the deployment of visual attention to static objects and features. Here we investigate neural correlates of age-related differences in spatial attention to multiple objects as they move. We used a multiple object tracking task, in which younger and older adults were asked to keep track of moving target objects that moved randomly in the visual field among irrelevant distractor objects. By recording the brain's electrophysiological responses during the tracking period, we were able to delineate neural processing for targets and distractors at early stages of visual processing (∼100–300 msec). Older adults showed less selective attentional modulation in the early phase of the visual P1 component (100–125 msec) than younger adults, indicating that early selection is compromised in old age. However, with a 25-msec delay relative to younger adults, older adults showed distinct processing of targets (125–150 msec), that is, a delayed yet intact attentional modulation. The magnitude of this delayed attentional modulation was related to tracking performance in older adults. The amplitude of the N1 component (175–210 msec) was smaller in older adults than in younger adults, and the target amplification effect of this component was also smaller in older relative to younger adults. Overall, these results indicate that normal aging affects the efficiency and timing of early visual processing during multiple object tracking.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document