scholarly journals Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention.

Author(s):  
Christian N. L. Olivers ◽  
Frank Meijer ◽  
Jan Theeuwes
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld ◽  
Anna Schubö

Visual search is impaired when a salient task-irrelevant stimulus is presented together with the target. Recent research has shown that this attentional capture effect is enhanced when the salient stimulus matches working memory (WM) content, arguing in favor of attention guidance from WM. Visual attention was also shown to be closely coupled with action planning. Preparing a movement renders action-relevant perceptual dimensions more salient and thus increases search efficiency for stimuli sharing that dimension. The present study aimed at revealing common underlying mechanisms for selective attention, WM, and action planning. Participants both prepared a specific movement (grasping or pointing) and memorized a color hue. Before the movement was executed towards an object of the memorized color, a visual search task (additional singleton) was performed. Results showed that distraction from target was more pronounced when the additional singleton had a memorized color. This WM-guided attention deployment was more pronounced when participants prepared a grasping movement. We argue that preparing a grasping movement mediates attention guidance from WM content by enhancing representations of memory content that matches the distractor shape (i.e., circles), thus encouraging attentional capture by circle distractors of the memorized color. We conclude that templates for visual search, action planning, and WM compete for resources and thus cause interferences.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Litian Chen ◽  
Jiewei Zheng ◽  
Mengjiao ◽  
Ping Zhu ◽  
mowed shen ◽  
...  

This study aimed to determine the unit of interaction between visual working memory (VWM) and attention. Therefore, we examined two opposing hypotheses: (a) the unit of interaction is a Boolean map, which is a data format that can contain only one within-dimension feature (e.g., “red” or “circle”; Boolean-map-unit hypothesis); and (b) the unit of interaction is an object (object-unit hypothesis). In two experiments, participants held in their VWM two colors from either one or two objects, or one color, and then performed a search task that sometimes contained a distractor with a memory-matching color. The results showed that the attentional capture by two different colors encoded from one integrated object was equivalent to that of a single color, and was much stronger than that of two colors from separate objects, which supports the object-unit hypothesis. These findings have crucial implications for understanding the architecture of interaction between VWM and attention.


2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 1223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei ZHANG ◽  
Bingping ZHOU ◽  
Ling ZANG ◽  
Shuliang MO

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy F. Brady ◽  
Viola S. Störmer ◽  
Anna Shafer-Skelton ◽  
Jamal Rodgers Williams ◽  
Angus F. Chapman ◽  
...  

Both visual attention and visual working memory tend to be studied with very simple stimuli and low-level paradigms, designed to allow us to understand the representations and processes in detail, or with fully realistic stimuli that make such precise understanding difficult but are more representative of the real world. In this chapter we argue for an intermediate approach in which visual attention and visual working memory are studied by scaling up from the simplest settings to more complex settings that capture some aspects of the complexity of the real-world, while still remaining in the realm of well-controlled stimuli and well-understood tasks. We believe this approach, which we have been taking in our labs, will allow a more generalizable set of knowledge about visual attention and visual working memory while maintaining the rigor and control that is typical of vision science and psychophysics studies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 190228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quan Wan ◽  
Ying Cai ◽  
Jason Samaha ◽  
Bradley R. Postle

How does the neural representation of visual working memory content vary with behavioural priority? To address this, we recorded electroencephalography (EEG) while subjects performed a continuous-performance 2-back working memory task with oriented-grating stimuli. We tracked the transition of the neural representation of an item ( n ) from its initial encoding, to the status of ‘unprioritized memory item' (UMI), and back to ‘prioritized memory item', with multivariate inverted encoding modelling. Results showed that the representational format was remapped from its initially encoded format into a distinctive ‘opposite' representational format when it became a UMI and then mapped back into its initial format when subsequently prioritized in anticipation of its comparison with item n + 2. Thus, contrary to the default assumption that the activity representing an item in working memory might simply get weaker when it is deprioritized, it may be that a process of priority-based remapping helps to protect remembered information when it is not in the focus of attention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document