scholarly journals The Peroxidatic Thiol of Peroxiredoxin 1 is Nitrosated by Nitrosoglutathione but Coordinates to the Dinitrosyl Iron Complex of Glutathione

Antioxidants ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela R. Truzzi ◽  
Simone V. Alves ◽  
Luis E. S. Netto ◽  
Ohara Augusto

Protein S-nitrosation is an important consequence of NO●·metabolism with implications in physiology and pathology. The mechanisms responsible for S-nitrosation in vivo remain debatable and kinetic data on protein S-nitrosation by different agents are limited. 2-Cys peroxiredoxins, in particular Prx1 and Prx2, were detected as being S-nitrosated in multiple mammalian cells under a variety of conditions. Here, we investigated the kinetics of Prx1 S-nitrosation by nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), a recognized biological nitrosating agent, and by the dinitrosyl-iron complex of glutathione (DNIC-GS; [Fe(NO)2(GS)2]−), a hypothetical nitrosating agent. Kinetics studies following the intrinsic fluorescence of Prx1 and its mutants (C83SC173S and C52S) were complemented by product analysis; all experiments were performed at pH 7.4 and 25 ℃. The results show GSNO-mediated nitrosation of Prx1 peroxidatic residue ( k + N O C y s 52 = 15.4 ± 0.4 M−1. s−1) and of Prx1 Cys83 residue ( k + N O C y s 83 = 1.7 ± 0.4 M−1. s−1). The reaction of nitrosated Prx1 with GSH was also monitored and provided a second-order rate constant for Prx1Cys52NO denitrosation of k − N O C y s 52 = 14.4 ± 0.3 M−1. s−1. In contrast, the reaction of DNIC-GS with Prx1 did not nitrosate the enzyme but formed DNIC-Prx1 complexes. The peroxidatic Prx1 Cys was identified as the residue that more rapidly replaces the GS ligand from DNIC-GS ( k D N I C C y s 52 = 7.0 ± 0.4 M−1. s−1) to produce DNIC-Prx1 ([Fe(NO)2(GS)(Cys52-Prx1)]−). Altogether, the data showed that in addition to S-nitrosation, the Prx1 peroxidatic residue can replace the GS ligand from DNIC-GS, forming stable DNIC-Prx1, and both modifications disrupt important redox switches.

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. I. Pisarenko ◽  
L. I. Serebryakova ◽  
O. V. Tskitishvili ◽  
I. M. Studneva ◽  
A. F. Vanin ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 270 (49) ◽  
pp. 29244-29249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Boese ◽  
Peter I. Mordvintcev ◽  
Anatoly F. Vanin ◽  
Rudi Busse ◽  
Alexander Mülsch

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (18) ◽  
pp. 9383-9392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shou-Cheng Wu ◽  
Chung-Yen Lu ◽  
Yi-Lin Chen ◽  
Feng-Chun Lo ◽  
Ting-Yin Wang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 1192 ◽  
pp. 264-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Оlesya V. Pokidova ◽  
Nina S. Emel’yanova ◽  
Boris L. Psikha ◽  
Natalia A. Sanina ◽  
Alexander V. Kulikov ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (23) ◽  
pp. 16998-17008
Author(s):  
D. Chase Pectol ◽  
Sarosh Khan ◽  
Mahmoud Elsabahy ◽  
Karen L. Wooley ◽  
Soon-Mi Lim ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 127 (49) ◽  
pp. 15037-15042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzung-Wen Chiou ◽  
Tsai-Te Lu ◽  
Ying-Hao Wu ◽  
Yi-Ju Yu ◽  
Li-Kang Chu ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 899 (1) ◽  
pp. 407-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDREI M. KOMAROV ◽  
I. TONG MAK ◽  
WILLIAM B. WEGLICKI

BIOPHYSICS ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 963-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. F. Vanin ◽  
L. A. Ostrovskaya ◽  
D. B. Korman ◽  
L. N. Kubrina ◽  
R. R. Borodulin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document