scholarly journals Bayesian Calibration of Hysteretic Parameters with Consideration of the Model Discrepancy for Use in Seismic Structural Health Monitoring

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 5813
Author(s):  
Rosario Ceravolo ◽  
Alessio Faraci ◽  
Gaetano Miraglia

Bayesian model calibration techniques are commonly employed in the characterization of nonlinear dynamic systems, as they provide a conceptual and effective framework to deal with model uncertainties, experimental errors and procedure assumptions. This understanding has resulted in the need to introduce a model discrepancy term to account for the differences between model-based predictions and real observations. Indeed, the goal of this work is to investigate model-driven seismic structural health monitoring procedures based on a Bayesian uncertainty quantification framework, and thus make relevant considerations for its use in the seismic structural health monitoring, focusing on masonry structures. Specifically, the Bayesian inference has been applied to the calibration of nonlinear hysteretic systems to both provide: (i) most probable values (MPV) of the parameters following the calibration; and (ii) estimates of the model discrepancy posterior distribution. The effect of the model discrepancy in the calibration is first illustrated recurring to a single degree of freedom using a Bouc–Wen type oscillator as a numerical benchmark. The model discrepancy is then introduced for calibrating a reference nonlinear Bouc–Wen model derived from real data acquired on a monitored masonry building. The main novelty of this study is the application of the framework of uncertainty quantification on models representing data measured directly on masonry structures during seismic events.

Author(s):  
Rosario Ceravolo ◽  
Alessio Faraci ◽  
GAETANO MIRAGLIA

Bayesian model calibration techniques are commonly employed in the characterization of nonlinear dynamic systems, as they provide a conceptual and effective framework to deal with model uncertainties, experimental errors and procedure assumptions. This understanding has resulted in the need to introduce a model discrepancy term to account for the differences between model-based predictions and real observations. Indeed, the goal of this work is to enhance model-driven Structural Health Monitoring procedures by incorporating the posterior uncertainty linked to updated model discrepancy, and thus make relevant considerations for its use in the Structural Health Monitoring. Specifically, the Bayesian inference has been applied to the calibration of nonlinear hysteretic systems to both provide: (i) most probable values (MPV) of the parameters following the calibration, and; (ii) estimates of the model discrepancy posterior distribution. The effect of the model discrepancy in the calibration is first illustrated recurring to a single degree of freedom Bouc-Wen type oscillator, and then applied for calibrating a reference nonlinear Bouc-Wen model, deriving from real data acquired on a monitored masonry building.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Ni ◽  
Ye Xia ◽  
Wanheng Li ◽  
Hanyong Liu ◽  
Limin Sun

<p>Numerous denoising approaches have already been presented to handle the noise in measured data of structural health monitoring systems. However, the performances and features of these existing methods applied in real data-set are not clear enough yet, where the noise is not known in advance. Therefore, based on the measured structural response data from a tied-arch bridge in China, six common data denoising methods are selected for a comparative study. The denoising effects are evaluated based on spectrums. Conclusions on the applicable situations and robustness of involved methods are given. A corresponding program is also developed. This study can provide references for applying the denoising methods in real structural health monitoring system data-set.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document