scholarly journals The Incidence and Treatment Response of Double Expression of MYC and BCL2 in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3369
Author(s):  
Jisun Hwang ◽  
Chong Hyun Suh ◽  
Kyung Won Kim ◽  
Ho Sung Kim ◽  
Austin I. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Bcl2 Protein ◽  
Large B Cell

MYC/BCL2 protein co-expression (i.e., double expressor) has been shown to be a negative predictor of outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We aimed to establish the incidence of double expressor status in patients with de novo DLBCL and identify the predictive value of this biomarker on treatment response through systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies published through December 2019 that reported proportions of double expressor DLBCL. The pooled proportions of MYC and BCL2 expression, both alone and in combination, were computed using the inverse variance method for calculating weights and by the DerSimonian–Laird method. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) of complete remission (CR) rate were calculated, and meta-regression analysis was conducted to explore heterogeneity. Forty-one studies (7054 patients) were included. The pooled incidence of double expressor status in DLBCL was 23% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20–26%), with an adjusted estimate of 31% (95% CI, 27–36%). Neither MYC/BCL2 protein cutoff values, race, mean, or median age of included patients, or overall study quality was a significant factor of heterogeneity (p ≥ 0.20). Cases without double expressor status demonstrated a higher probability of CR to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone treatment (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.55–4.67). Our results reaffirm the predictive power of this important biomarker.

Prognostic significance of CD30 expression in diffuse large B cell lymphoma: A systematic review with meta‐analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Isabelly Rodrigues‐Fernandes ◽  
Lucas Guimarães Abreu ◽  
Raghu Radhakrishnan ◽  
Danyel Elias da Cruz Perez ◽  
Gleyson Kleber Amaral‐Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

scholarly journals The Role of Consolidative Radiotherapy after a Complete Response to Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the Rituximab Era: Results from a Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhong Hu ◽  
Chao Deng ◽  
Wen Zou ◽  
Guangsen Zhang ◽  
Jingjing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Large B Cell

Background: The current standard therapy for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (RCHOP). The role of radiotherapy (RT) after complete response (CR) to RCHOP in patients with DLBCL remains unclear. This systematic review with a meta-analysis is an attempt to evaluate this role. Methods: Studies that evaluated RT versus no-RT after CR to RCHOP for DLBCL patients were searched in databases. Hazard ratios (HR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 4 qualified retrospective studies (633 patients) were included in this review. The results suggested that RT improved overall survival (OS; HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.77) and progression-free/event-free survival (PFS/EFS; HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11-0.50) in all patients compared with no-RT. In a subgroup analysis of patients with stage III-IV DLBCL, RT improved PFS/EFS (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.51) and local control (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.44), with a trend of improving OS (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-1.05). Conclusion: Consolidation RT could significantly improve outcomes of DLBCL patients who achieved a CR to RCHOP. However, the significance of these results was limited by these retrospective data. Further investigation of the role of consolidation RT in the rituximab era is needed.

scholarly journals Systematic Review of the Potential of MicroRNAs in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ane Larrabeiti-Etxebarria ◽  
Maria Lopez-Santillan ◽  
Borja Santos-Zorrozua ◽  
Elixabet Lopez-Lopez ◽  
Africa Garcia-Orad
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Extracellular Vesicle ◽  
Human Patient ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of invasive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). DLBCL presents with variable backgrounds, which results in heterogeneous outcomes among patients. Although new tools have been developed for the classification and management of patients, 40% of them still have primary refractory disease or relapse. In addition, multiple factors regarding the pathogenesis of this disease remain unclear and identification of novel biomarkers is needed. In this context, recent investigations point to microRNAs as useful biomarkers in cancer. The aim of this systematic review was to provide new insight into the role of miRNAs in the diagnosis, classification, treatment response and prognosis of DLBCL patients. We used the following terms in PubMed” ((‘Non-coding RNA’) OR (‘microRNA’ OR ‘miRNA’ OR ‘miR’) OR (‘exosome’) OR (‘extracellular vesicle’) OR (‘secretome’)) AND (‘Diffuse large B cell lymphoma’ OR ‘DLBCL’)” to search for studies evaluating miRNAs as a diagnosis, subtype, treatment response or prognosis biomarkers in primary DLBCL in human patient populations. As a result, the analysis was restricted to the role of miRNAs in tumor tissue and we did not consider circulating miRNAs. A total of thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Among them, twenty-one were classified in the diagnosis category, twenty in classification, five in treatment response and nineteen in prognosis. In this review, we have identified miR-155-5p and miR-21-5p as miRNAs of potential utility for diagnosis, while miR-155-5p and miR-221-3p could be useful for classification. Further studies are needed to exploit the potential of this field.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document