scholarly journals Improving Newborn Resuscitation by Making Every Birth a Learning Event

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1194
Author(s):  
Kourtney Bettinger ◽  
Eric Mafuta ◽  
Amy Mackay ◽  
Carl Bose ◽  
Helge Myklebust ◽  
...  

One third of all neonatal deaths are caused by intrapartum-related events, resulting in neonatal respiratory depression (i.e., failure to breathe at birth). Evidence-based resuscitation with stimulation, airway clearance, and positive pressure ventilation reduces mortality from respiratory depression. Improving adherence to evidence-based resuscitation is vital to preventing neonatal deaths caused by respiratory depression. Standard resuscitation training programs, combined with frequent simulation practice, have not reached their life-saving potential due to ongoing gaps in bedside performance. Complex neonatal resuscitations, such as those involving positive pressure ventilation, are relatively uncommon for any given resuscitation provider, making consistent clinical practice an unrealistic solution for improving performance. This review discusses strategies to allow every birth to act as a learning event within the context of both high- and low-resource settings. We review strategies that involve clinical-decision support during newborn resuscitation, including the visual display of a resuscitation algorithm, peer-to-peer support, expert coaching, and automated guidance. We also review strategies that involve post-event reflection after newborn resuscitation, including delivery room checklists, audits, and debriefing. Strategies that make every birth a learning event have the potential to close performance gaps in newborn resuscitation that remain after training and frequent simulation practice, and they should be prioritized for further development and evaluation.

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. S36
Author(s):  
A. Solevag ◽  
P. Cheung ◽  
E. Haemmerle ◽  
S. van Os ◽  
G. Schmölzer

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1092
Author(s):  
Siren Rettedal ◽  
Joar Eilevstjønn ◽  
Amalie Kibsgaard ◽  
Jan Terje Kvaløy ◽  
Hege Ersdal

Background: Assessment of heart rate (HR) is essential during newborn resuscitation, and comparison of dry-electrode ECG technology to standard monitoring by 3-lead ECG and Pulse Oximetry (PO) is lacking. Methods: NeoBeat, ECG, and PO were applied to newborns resuscitated at birth. Resuscitations were video recorded, and HR was registered every second. Results: Device placement time from birth was median (quartiles) 6 (4, 18) seconds for NeoBeat versus 138 (97, 181) seconds for ECG and 152 (103, 216) seconds for PO. Time to first HR presentation from birth was 22 (13, 45) seconds for NeoBeat versus 171 (129, 239) seconds for ECG and 270 (185, 357) seconds for PO. Proportion of time with HR feedback from NeoBeat during resuscitation from birth was 85 (69, 93)%, from arrival at the resuscitation table 98 (85, 100)%, and during positive pressure ventilation 100 (95, 100)%. For ECG, these proportions were, 25 (0, 43)%, 28 (0, 56)%, and 33 (0, 66)% and for PO, 0 (0, 16)%, 0 (0, 16)%, and 0 (0, 18)%. All p < 0.0001. Conclusions: NeoBeat was faster to place, presented HR more rapidly, and provided feedback on HR for a larger proportion of time during ongoing resuscitation compared to 3-lead ECG and PO.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. e0202641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Moshiro ◽  
Jeffrey M. Perlman ◽  
Hussein Kidanto ◽  
Jan Terje Kvaløy ◽  
Paschal Mdoe ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 100091
Author(s):  
Dana E. Niles ◽  
Christiane Skåre ◽  
Elizabeth E. Foglia ◽  
Elena Insley ◽  
Courtney Cines ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document