scholarly journals Minimal Cardiac Perforation by Lead Pacemaker Complicated with Pericardial Effusion and Impending Tamponade: Optimal Management with No Pericardiocentesis Driven by Echocardiography

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 191
Author(s):  
Carlo Caiati ◽  
Paolo Pollice ◽  
Luigi Truncellito ◽  
Mario Erminio Lepera ◽  
Stefano Favale

We report the case of a 51-year-old patient who underwent the implantation of a bi-ventricular implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) complicated by a sub-acute right ventricular minimal perforation with pericardial effusion and echocardiographic signs of tamponade. A new echocardiographic plane orientation allowed us to diagnose this condition in emergency and to make the right decision without delay, which consisting in unscrewing the active fixation screw under fluoroscopy guidance, while the pericardiocentesis was postponed. Thanks to the intervention focused on eliminating the cause of the postcardiac injury syndrome, the patient recovered rapidly and ultimately avoided the pericardiocentesis procedure.

2001 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 283-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam T Tran ◽  
Adam Zivin ◽  
Darius Mozaffarian ◽  
Riyad Karmy-Jones

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placements can be associated with serious complications. This paper reports a patient in whom percutaneous placement of an ICD resulted in a hemopneumothorax. This was due to an active fixation lead that perforated the right atrial wall and injured the adjacent lung parenchyma. The hemothorax was drained thoracoscopically, and the atrial injury was covered with fibrin glue.


Circulation ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 119 (15) ◽  
pp. 2112-2113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ángel Ferrero-de-Loma-Osorio ◽  
José Albors-Martín ◽  
Ricardo Ruiz-Granell ◽  
Eloy Domínguez-Mafé ◽  
José Ángel Bahamonde-Romano ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e242489
Author(s):  
Emna Allouche ◽  
Soumaya Chargui ◽  
Marwa Fathi ◽  
Leila Bezdah

Myocardial perforation is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening complication of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Myocardial perforation may be acute, subacute or chronic when it occurs within 24 hours of the device insertion; between 1 day and 30 days; and more than 30 days after implantation. This complication may occur in 1.7%–7% of patients. However, subacute myocardial perforation is rare and affects 0.5%–1.2% of patients. We report the case of an 85-year-old patient with a pacemaker failure 10 days after implantation due to a subacute myocardial perforation caused by an active fixation ventricular lead. Transthoracic echocardiography showed penetration of the ventricular lead through the right ventricular apex into the pericardium without any pericardial effusion. We confirmed myocardial perforation by a CT scan. We referred her to the surgery ward where she was successfully managed.


Circulation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 126 (10) ◽  
pp. 1314-1315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Nishiyama ◽  
Seiji Takatsuki ◽  
Takehiro Kimura ◽  
Yoshiyasu Aizawa ◽  
Kotaro Fukumoto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document