scholarly journals Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Cardio-Respiratory Coupling

Entropy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1126
Author(s):  
Nikola N. Radovanović ◽  
Siniša U. Pavlović ◽  
Goran Milašinović ◽  
Mirjana M. Platiša
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Cardiac Rhythm ◽  
Respiratory Rhythm ◽  
Sample Entropy ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Correlation Properties

In this study, the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on the relationship between the cardiovascular and respiratory systems in heart failure subjects was examined for the first time. We hypothesized that alterations in cardio-respiratory interactions, after CRT implantation, quantified by signal complexity, could be a marker of a favorable CRT response. Sample entropy and scaling exponents were calculated from synchronously recorded cardiac and respiratory signals 20 min in duration, collected in 47 heart failure patients at rest, before and 9 months after CRT implantation. Further, cross-sample entropy between these signals was calculated. After CRT, all patients had lower heart rate and CRT responders had reduced breathing frequency. Results revealed that higher cardiac rhythm complexity in CRT non-responders was associated with weak correlations of cardiac rhythm at baseline measurement over long scales and over short scales at follow-up recording. Unlike CRT responders, in non-responders, a significant difference in respiratory rhythm complexity between measurements could be consequence of divergent changes in correlation properties of the respiratory signal over short and long scales. Asynchrony between cardiac and respiratory rhythm increased significantly in CRT non-responders during follow-up. Quantification of complexity and synchrony between cardiac and respiratory signals shows significant associations between CRT success and stability of cardio-respiratory coupling.

Abstract 1604: Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Differs Between Patients With and Without Previous Right Ventricular Pacing

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea M Thelen ◽  
Christopher L Kaufman ◽  
Kevin V Burns ◽  
Daniel R Kaiser ◽  
Aaron S Kelly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Radial Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Doppler Imaging ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Peak Displacement

Background: Previous large studies on the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure have generally excluded patients previously paced from the right ventricle (RV). Previously RV paced patients (RVp) can exhibit an iatrogenic cause of dyssynchrony and reduced systolic function and thus, may respond differently to CRT than patients not previously RV paced (nRVp). The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that RVp patients have greater improvements in left ventricular systolic function, volumes, and dyssynchrony in response to CRT than nRVp. Methods: Standard echocardiograms with tissue Doppler imaging were performed before and after chronic CRT in RVp (n = 21, 16 male) and nRVp (n = 70, 54 male) heart failure patients. Ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular end diastolic (LVEDV) and systolic (LVESV) volumes were calculated using the biplane Simpson’s method. Longitudinal dyssynchrony was calculated as the standard deviation of time to peak displacement (TT-12) of 12 segments in the apical views. Using mid-ventricular short axis views and speckle-tracking methods, radial dyssynchrony (Rad dys ) was calculated as the maximal time difference between six myocardial segments for peak radial strain. Echo response was defined as ≥ 15% reduction in LVESV. Results are reported as mean ± SD. Results: Significant baseline differences (p < 0.05) were observed between groups (RVp vs. nRVp) for age (74 ± 13 vs. 67 ± 13 year), follow-up time (6.1 ± 1.8 vs. 4.6 ± 2.1 months), LVEDV (154.3±50.8 vs.185.3±56.9 mL), and a trend for LVESV (112.4 ± 40.6 vs. 134.9 ± 47 mL, p = 0 .05). No differences were observed for EF, etiology of heart failure, and dyssynchrony measures between groups at baseline. Echo response rate was significantly ( p < 0.05) greater in RVp (76%) than nRVp (57%). After adjusting for baseline differences, RVp had greater improvement in EF (14 ± 9 vs. 8 ± 7%, p < 0.05) and LVESV (−33 ± 18 vs. −20 ± 21%, p < 0.05). After adjustment for follow-up time, no difference was observed for change in dyssynchrony between groups. Conclusion: RVp patients upgraded to CRT exhibit greater improvements in systolic function and ventricular remodeling as compared to nRVp patients.

scholarly journals Cardiac resynchronization therapy and its effects in patients with type 2 DIAbetes mellitus OPTimized in automatic vs. echo guided approach. Data from the DIA-OPTA investigators

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Celestino Sardu ◽  
Pasquale Paolisso ◽  
Valentino Ducceschi ◽  
Matteo Santamaria ◽  
Cosimo Sacra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRTd) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) optimized via automatic vs. echocardiography-guided approach. Background The suboptimal atrio-ventricular (AV) and inter-ventricular (VV) delays optimization reduces CRTd response. Therefore, we hypothesized that automatic CRTd optimization might improve clinical outcomes in T2DM patients. Methods We designed a prospective, multicenter study to recruit, from October 2016 to June 2019, 191 consecutive failing heart patients with T2DM, and candidate to receive a CRTd. Study outcomes were CRTd responders rate, hospitalizations for heart failure (HF) worsening, cardiac deaths and all cause of deaths in T2DM patients treated with CRTd and randomly optimized via automatic (n 93) vs. echocardiography-guided (n 98) approach at 12 months of follow-up. Results We had a significant difference in the rate of CRTd responders (68 (73.1%) vs. 58 (59.2%), p 0.038), and hospitalizations for HF worsening (12 (16.1%) vs. 22 (22.4%), p 0.030) in automatic vs. echocardiography-guided group of patients. At multivariate Cox regression analysis, the automatic guided approach (3.636 [1.271–10.399], CI 95%, p 0.016) and baseline highest values of atrium pressure (automatic SonR values, 2.863 [1.537–6.231], CI 95%, p 0.006) predicted rate of CRTd responders. In automatic group, we had significant difference in SonR values comparing the rate of CRTd responders vs. non responders (1.24 ± 0.72 g vs. 0.58 ± 0.46 g (follow-up), p 0.001), the rate of hospitalizations for HF worsening events (0.48 ± 0.29 g vs. 1.18 ± 0.43 g, p 0.001), and the rate of cardiac deaths ( 1.13 ± 0.72 g vs. 0.65 ± 0.69 g, p 0.047). Conclusions Automatic optimization increased CRTd responders rate, and reduced hospitalizations for HF worsening. Intriguingly, automatic CRTd and highest baseline values of SonR could be predictive of CRTd responders. Notably, there was a significant difference in SonR values for CRTd responders vs. non responders, and about hospitalizations for HF worsening and cardiac deaths. Clinical trial ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04547244.

P5680One-year outcomes of heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy using adaptivCRT algorithm

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Briongos Figuero ◽  
A Estevez ◽  
M L Perez ◽  
J B Martinez-Ferrer ◽  
L Alvarez-Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Ventricular Pacing ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Risk Of Death

Abstract Background Adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) algorithm provides synchronized left ventricular (LV) only pacing and ambulatory optimization of the intrinsic atrioventricular and interventricular conduction intervals. Studies reporting morbidity and mortality outcomes of aCRT carriers in daily clinical practice are lacking. Purpose To determine in a real-life setting, whether 1-year outcomes were different among CRT carriers undergoing aCRT pacing and those under conventional biventricular (biV) pacing. Methods Symptomatic heart failure (HF) patients with sinus rhythm undergoing first CRT-defibrillator implant were selected from the UMBRELLA nationwide registry (2012–2017). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization at 12-month follow-up. HF admission was defined as hospitalization due to symptoms requiring intravenous diuretic treatment. Primary healthcare records were used to prospectively collect all data. Results Two hundred and six patients were collected (66.1±8.7 years; 73.3% male). Eighty-seven out of 206 patients were implanted with an aCRT capable device, but this algorithm was activated at implant and remained enabled at 1-year in 59 patients (aCRT group). The other 147 patients composed the non-aCRT group. At implant left bundle branch block was present in 93% of patients, 69.6% of population was in functional class III or IV and mean left ventricle ejection fraction was of 26.5±5.6%. Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was present in 63.1% of patients and optimal medical treatment was achieved in majority of population (92% of patients with beta-blockers; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorsor angiotensin II receptor blockersin 89%). The percentage of ventricular pacing through 12 months was 96.1±9.4% in non-aCRT patients and 97.5±2.7% in aCRT patients (p=0.261). In aCRT patients, LV-only pacing accounted for a mean of 53.3±37.6% of all ventricular pacing. After 12-month follow-up period, 25 patients (12.1%) met the primary composite endpoint of death or HF hospitalization. Nine patients died and nineteen patients were admitted due to worsening HF. There was no difference in the risk of all-cause death or HF hospitalization between aCRT and non-aCRT patients (10.2% vs. 12.9% respectively; OR=0.76, CI: 0.29–2.01, p=0.585) Conclusions In this contemporary cohort of HF patients undergoing CRT with high percentages of ventricular pacing, clinical performance of aCRT algorithm was adequate. The risk of death or HF hospitalization was low and no differences were observed at one-year follow-up. Future randomized studies will clarify the role of this algorithm in CRT carriers. Acknowledgement/Funding None

Indication and Long-Term Follow-up Results of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Advanced Heart Failure

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. S259
Author(s):  
Naoki Matsuda ◽  
Morio Shoda ◽  
Azusa Furugen ◽  
Gohei Tanizaki ◽  
Naoko Ishizuka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Advanced Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Time trends in sudden cardiac death risk in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (21) ◽  
pp. 1976-1986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sérgio Barra ◽  
Rui Providência ◽  
Kumar Narayanan ◽  
Serge Boveda ◽  
Rudolf Duehmke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Aims While data from randomized trials suggest a declining incidence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) among heart failure patients, the extent to which such a trend is present among patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has not been evaluated. We therefore assessed changes in SCD incidence, and associated factors, in CRT recipients over the last 20 years. Methods and results Literature search from inception to 30 April 2018 for observational and randomized studies involving CRT patients, with or without defibrillator, providing specific cause-of-death data. Sudden cardiac death was the primary endpoint. For each study, rate of SCD per 1000 patient-years of follow-up was calculated. Trend line graphs were subsequently constructed to assess change in SCD rates over time, which were further analysed by device type, patient characteristics, and medical therapy. Fifty-three studies, comprising 22 351 patients with 60 879 patient-years of follow-up and a total of 585 SCD, were included. There was a gradual decrease in SCD rates since the early 2000s in both randomized and observational studies, with rates falling more than four-fold. The rate of decline in SCD was steeper than that of all-cause mortality, and accordingly, the proportion of deaths which were due to SCD declined over the years. The magnitude of absolute decline in SCD was more prominent among CRT-pacemaker (CRT-P) patients compared to those receiving CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D), with the difference in SCD rates between CRT-P and CRT-D decreasing considerably over time. There was a progressive increase in age, use of beta-blockers, and left ventricular ejection fraction, and conversely, a decrease in QRS duration and antiarrhythmic drug use. Conclusion Sudden cardiac death rates have progressively declined in the CRT heart failure population over time, with the difference between CRT-D vs. CRT-P recipients narrowing considerably.

Abstract 3072: Beneficial Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Class Two Heart Failure

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin E Ellison ◽  
Brad J Mikaelian ◽  
Karin F Hoth ◽  
Fausto G Devecchi ◽  
Athena Poppas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Mental Health ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Minute Walk

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves heart failure (HF) symptoms in patients (pts) with EF <35%, QRS >120ms, and NYHA class 3 and 4 HF. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of CRT in pts with EF <35%, QRS >130, and class 2 vs 3/4 HF. We enrolled 25 patients. All received ECGs, transthoracic echocardiograms, 6 minute walk tests, and Minnesota quality of life questionnaires pre-op and three months post-op. Fourteen pts were class 2, 10 patients were class 3, and 1 class 4. Ischemic cardiomyopathy accounted for 7 out of the 14 class 2 pts and 5 out of the 11 class 3/4 pts. As a group, all patients had a significant increase in 6 minute walk (1150 vs 1249, p=0.02), increase in EF (30% vs 39%, p<0.01), decreased QRS duration (162 vs 143, p=0.001), and improved quality of life scores (31.1 vs 21.7, p=0.03), comparing pre and post-op measurements. There was no significant difference in response of class 2 versus class 3/4 pts (see table ). Nonischemic pts had greater response than ischemic pts. Class 2 HF pts reported greater improvement in mental health than class 3 and 4. Younger patients reported greater functional improvement, while pts with higher BMI reported less physical benefit. Summary: Pts with NYHA class 2 symptoms derive similar hemodynamic benefit from CRT as pts with class 3/4 symptoms and may derive greater mental health benefits than class 3/4 pts. Comparison of Pre and Post-Implant Parameters Between Class 2 and 3/4 Patients

scholarly journals The role of three dimensional transeosephageal echocardiography in predicting the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on mitral regurgitation in patients with low ejection fraction heart fail

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Demirtola ◽  
TS Tan ◽  
A Mammadli ◽  
IM Akbulut ◽  
I Dincer
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Posterior Leaflet ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Purpose Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has  a positive effect on the improvement of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with low ejection heart failure. However geometric changes in the mitral valve apparatus, subvalvular structures and their contribution to  the improvement of mitral regurgitation after CRT have not  been clearly defined. The aim of our study was to evaluate the geometric parameters of mitral valve apparatus measured with 3Dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before CRT implantation and to determine the parameters predicting the improvement of mitral regurgitation after CRT. Methods Thirty patients with moderate or severe mitral regurgitation with low EF heart failure planned for CRT implantation and had an indication for TEE were included in the study. Effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) and regurgitant volume (RV) measurements were performed before CRT implantation. Detailed quantitative measurements of mitral valve were done from recorded images by 3D TEE. ERO, RV measurements were repeated to evaluate mitral regurgitation at the end of 3rd month. Results There were no significant changes in left ventricular EF and left ventricular diameters at the end of 3rd month, whereas ERO and RV values were decreased. A statistically significant difference was found in  posterior leaflet angle between mitral regurgitation responder and non-responder groups.  (28,93 ± 8,41 vs 41,25 ± 10,90, p = 0,006). Conclusion Heart failure patients with moderate or severe functional mitral regurgitation who underwent CRT implantation were found to have lower posterior leaflet angle measured by 3D TEE in the patient group whose mitral regurgitation improved after CRT. Abstract Figure.

695 Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients: 2 year follow-up

2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 144
Author(s):  
M BOCCHIARDO ◽  
G PISTIS ◽  
M ALCIATI ◽  
S MICELI ◽  
P DIDONNA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Heart Failure Patients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document