scholarly journals Winners and Losers in Palliative Care Service Delivery: Time for a Public Health Approach to Palliative and End of Life Care

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1615
Author(s):  
Samar M. Aoun     ◽  
Robyn Richmond ◽  
Leanne Jiang ◽  
Bruce Rumbold
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Public Health Approach ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care

Background: Consumer experience of palliative care has been inconsistently and selectively investigated. Methods: People in Western Australia who had experienced a life limiting illness in the past five years were recruited via social media and care organisations (2020) and invited to complete a cross sectional consumer survey on their experiences of the care they received. Results: 353 bereaved carers, current carers and patients responded. The winners, those who received the best quality end-of-life care, were those who were aware of palliative care as an end-of-life care (EOLC) option, qualified for admission to and were able to access a specialist palliative care program, and with mainly a cancer diagnosis. The losers, those who received end-of-life care that was adequate rather than best practice, were those who were unaware of palliative care as an EOLC option or did not qualify for or were unable to access specialist palliative care and had mainly a non-cancer diagnosis. Both groups were well supported throughout their illness by family and a wider social network. However, their family carers were not adequately supported by health services during caregiving and bereavement. Conclusions: A public health approach to palliative and end of life care is proposed to integrate tertiary, primary, and community services through active consumer engagement in the design and delivery of care. Therefore, suggested strategies may also have relevance in many other international settings.

scholarly journals The public health end-of-life care movement: history, principles, and styles of practice

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aliki Karapliagou ◽  
Allan Kellehear ◽  
Klaus Wegleitner
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Psychosocial Care ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Life Care ◽  
The Public ◽  
Civic Practice ◽  
Practice Methods

This chapter briefly outlines the history, key concepts, and main practice methods from public health approaches to end-of-life care. Although linked to psychosocial care approaches, its main methods draw not from psychology or health services inspired approaches but rather from health promotion, community development, and civic engagement. Key methods covered include community volunteering, social networking, community engagement, and compassionate communities and cities. The aim of these kinds of approaches is to embed palliative care practice as a social and civic practice in all sectors of society and to ensure that palliative care as a policy is represented in all civic policies (e.g. schools, workplaces, faith groups, and cultural activities) and not solely in health care.

Palliative care in the intensive cardiac care unit

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayne Wood ◽  
Maureen Carruthers
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
World Health ◽  
Terminal Phase ◽  
Cardiac Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Cardiac Care Unit

Specialist palliative care services originally focused on improving the quality of life for patients with a diagnosis of cancer in the terminal phase of their illness. However, organizations, such as the World Health Organization, supported by recent national strategies, such as the End of Life Care Strategy (United Kingdom, 2008), promote the early integration of specialist palliative care into the management of patients with incurable disease, irrespective of the diagnosis. The primary goal of the intensive cardiac care unit is to help patients survive acute threats to their lives. However, the suddenness and severity of illness, particularly when associated with an underlying cardiological diagnosis, often means that the provision of optimal specialist palliative care is challenging. This chapter addresses key issues relating to the provision of specialist palliative care in the challenging and complex environment of the intensive cardiac care unit, including symptom control, end of life care, decision making, and communication. The benefits of multidisciplinary working for effective quality improvement in patient care and best support for patients, families/carers, and staff are also addressed. The importance of interdisciplinary working is highlighted, and, by embedding the principles of holistic care into daily practice, the intensive cardiac care unit can ensure that patients and their families/carers receive the support they need in a timely manner from individuals who are well supported in what is often considered to be one of the most challenging medical environments.

Aggressiveness of end-of-life care before and after the utilization of a palliative care service.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9135-9135
Author(s):  
W. Gonsalves ◽  
T. Tashi ◽  
T. Davies ◽  
S. Ortman ◽  
R. Thota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Before And After

Association between family satisfaction and caregiver burden in cancer patients receiving outreach palliative care at home

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoko Naoki ◽  
Yoshinobu Matsuda ◽  
Isseki Maeda ◽  
Hideka Kamino ◽  
Yoko Kozaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Caregiver Burden ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Family Satisfaction ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care At Home

ABSTRACTObjective:Little is known about the associations between family satisfaction with end-of-life care and caregiver burden. We conducted a researcher-assisted questionnaire survey to clarify the impact of caregiver burden on family satisfaction and to determine the types of burden that decrease family satisfaction.Method:Bereaved family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer who received our outreach palliative care service were retrospectively identified. Family satisfaction with the end-of-life care provided by the palliative care service and caregiver burden were quantified using the Japanese versions of the FAMCARE Scale and the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), respectively.Results:Our study subjects included 23 family caregivers. The mean scores on the FAMCARE Scale and the ZBI for the total population were 72.8 ± 11.2 and 22.8 ± 17.3, respectively, indicating moderate-to-high satisfaction and low-to-moderate burden. Caregiver burden had a strong negative correlation to family satisfaction with end-of-life care (Spearman's rho [ρ] = −0.560, p = 0.005), which remained after adjustment for potential confounders (standardized beta [β] = −0.563, p = 0.01). Several burden items—including loss of control, personal time, social engagement with others, feeling angry with the patient, feeling that the patient wants more help than he/she needs, and a wish to leave the care to someone else—were associated with decreased satisfaction. The major cause of dissatisfaction for family members included the information provided regarding prognosis, family conferences with medical professionals, and the method of involvement of family members in care decisions.Significance of results:Caregiver burden can be a barrier to family satisfaction with end-of-life care at home. A home care model focused on caregiver burden could improve end-of-life experiences for patients and family caregivers.

Using action learning sets to support change in end-of-life care

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Gillett ◽  
Liz Reed ◽  
Liz Bryan
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Action Learning ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Integral Component ◽  
Learning Sets

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe the delivery of facilitated action learning sets as an integral component of a multidisciplinary end-of-life care course. Design/methodology/approach The educational intervention described in this paper is delivered by specialist palliative care practitioners to those working with dying patients and their families in non-specialist settings. The programme consists of two components: the first taught/experience-based component takes place in a hospice. The second integral component involves action learning sets which are facilitated by specialist palliative care staff over a six-month period. This paper reports the challenges, learning and benefits of using action learning sets to improve end-of-life care. Findings Action learning sets provide support which enables staff to implement changes to end-of-life care. Participants in the successful action learning sets were motivated to change practice and identified themselves as change agents. Management support was vital to allow participants the authority to implement changes to practice. Practical implications Facilitators need to gain participant and management commitment to the action learning process before the programme begins if they are to be successful in achieving changes to end-of-life care. Originality/value Hospices and other health care organisations work in partnership to deliver this programme, and this paper demonstrates how action learning sets can increase mutual understanding and communication between specialist and non-specialist end-of-life care settings.

scholarly journals How does Medical Assistance in Dying affect end-of-life care planning discussions? Experiences of Canadian multidisciplinary palliative care providers

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 263235242110459
Author(s):  
Anita Ho ◽  
Joshua S. Norman ◽  
Soodabeh Joolaee ◽  
Kristie Serota ◽  
Louise Twells ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Assisted Dying ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Medical Assistance ◽  
Medical Assistance In Dying ◽  
Qualitative Thematic Analysis

Background: More than a dozen countries have now legalized some form of assisted dying, and additional jurisdictions are considering similar legislations or expanding eligibility criteria. Despite the persistent controversies about the relationship between medicine, palliative care, and assisted dying, many people are interested in assisted dying. Understanding how end-of-life care discussions between patients and specialist palliative care providers may be affected by such legislation can inform end-of-life care delivery in the evolving socio-cultural and legal environment. Aim: To explore how the Canadian Medical Assistance in Dying legislation affects end-of-life care discussions between patients and multidisciplinary specialist palliative care providers. Design: Qualitative thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews. Participants: Forty-eight specialist palliative care providers from Vancouver (n = 26) and Toronto ( n = 22) were interviewed in person or by phone. Participants included physicians ( n = 22), nurses ( n = 15), social workers ( n = 7), and allied health professionals ( n = 4). Results: Qualitative thematic analysis identified five notable considerations associated with Medical Assistance in Dying affecting end-of-life care discussions: (1) concerns over having proactive conversations about the desire to hasten death, (2) uncertainties regarding wish-to-die statements, (3) conversation complexities around procedural matters, (4) shifting discussions about suffering and quality of life, and (5) the need and challenges of promoting open-ended discussions. Conclusion: Medical Assistance in Dying challenges end-of-life care discussions and requires education and support for all concerned to enable compassionate health professional communication. It remains essential to address psychosocial and existential suffering in medicine, but also to provide timely palliative care to ensure suffering is addressed before it is deemed irremediable. Hence, clarification is required regarding assisted dying as an intervention of last resort. Furthermore, professional and institutional guidance needs to better support palliative care providers in maintaining their holistic standard of care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document