scholarly journals Monitoring Solar Radiation UV Exposure in the Comoros

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (19) ◽  
pp. 10475
Author(s):  
Kévin Lamy ◽  
Marion Ranaivombola ◽  
Hassan Bencherif ◽  
Thierry Portafaix ◽  
Mohamed Abdoulwahab Toihir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ultraviolet Radiation ◽  
Cloud Cover ◽  
Relative Difference ◽  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Uv Index ◽  
Measurement Campaign ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
Sky Conditions ◽  
Very High

As part of the UV-Indien project, a station for measuring ultraviolet radiation and the cloud fraction was installed in December 2019 in Moroni, the capital of the Comoros, situated on the west coast of the island of Ngazidja. A ground measurement campaign was also carried out on 12 January 2020 during the ascent of Mount Karthala, located in the center of the island of Ngazidja. In addition, satellite estimates (Ozone Monitoring Instrument and TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument) and model outputs (Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service and Tropospheric Ultraviolet Model) were combined for this same region. On the one hand, these different measurements and estimates make it possible to quantify, evaluate, and monitor the health risk linked to exposure to ultraviolet radiation in this region and, on the other, they help to understand how cloud cover influences the variability of UV-radiation on the ground. The measurements of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument onboard the EOS-AURA satellite, being the longest timeseries of ultraviolet measurements available in this region, make it possible to quantify the meteorological conditions in Moroni and to show that more than 80% of the ultraviolet indices are classified as high, and that 60% of these are classified as extreme. The cloud cover measured in Moroni by an All Sky Camera was used to distinguish between the cases of UV index measurements taken under clear or cloudy sky conditions. The ground-based measurements thus made it possible to describe the variability of the diurnal cycle of the UV index and the influence of cloud cover on this parameter. They also permitted the satellite measurements and the results of the simulations to be validated. In clear sky conditions, a relative difference of between 6 and 11% was obtained between satellite or model estimates and ground measurements. The ultraviolet index measurement campaign on Mount Karthala showed maximum one-minute standard erythemal doses at 0.3 J·m−2 and very high daily cumulative erythemal doses, at more than 80 J·m−2. These very high levels are also observed throughout the year and all skin phototypes can exceed the daily erythemal dose threshold, at more than 20 J·m−2.

scholarly journals Comparison of UV irradiances from Aura/Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) with Brewer measurements at El Arenosillo (Spain) – Part 1: Analysis of parameter influence

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 6797-6827 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Antón ◽  
V. E. Cachorro ◽  
J. M. Vilaplana ◽  
C. Toledano ◽  
N. A. Krotkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Companion Paper ◽  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Solar Elevation ◽  
Uv Irradiance ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
Absorbing Aerosols ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Sky Conditions

Abstract. The main objective of this study is to compare the erythemal UV irradiance (UVER) and spectral UV irradiances (at 305, 310 and 324 nm) from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) onboard NASA EOS/Aura polar sun-synchronous satellite (launched in July 2004, local equator crossing time 01:45 p.m.) with ground-based measurements from the Brewer spectroradiometer #150 located at El Arenosillo (South of Spain). The analyzed period comprises more than four years, from October 2004 to December 2008. The effects of several factors (clouds, aerosols, ozone and the solar elevation) on OMI-Brewer comparisons were analyzed. The proxies used for each factor were: OMI Lambertian Equivalent Reflectivity (LER) at 360 nm (clouds), the Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) at 440 nm measured from the ground-based Cimel sun-photometer (http://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov), OMI total column ozone, and solar elevation at OMI overpass time. The comparison for all sky conditions reveals positive biases (OMI higher than Brewer) 12.3% for UVER, 14.2% for UV irradiance at 305 nm, 10.6% for 310 nm and 8.7% for 324 nm. The OMI-Brewer Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is reduced when cloudy cases are removed from the analysis, (e.g., RMSE ~20% for all sky conditions and RMSE smaller than 10% for cloud-free conditions). However, the biases remain and even become more significant for the cloud-free cases with respect to all sky conditions. The mentioned overestimation is clearly documented as due to aerosol extinction influence. The differences OMI-Brewer typically decrease with increasing the Solar Zenith Angle (SZA). The seasonal dependence of the OMI-Brewer difference for cloud-free conditions is driven by aerosol climatology. To account for the aerosol effect, a first evaluation in order to compare with previous TOMS results (Anton et al., 2007) was performed. This comparison shows that the OMI bias is between +14% and +19% for UVER and spectral UV irradiances for moderately-high aerosol load (AOD>0.25). The OMI bias is decreased by a factor of 2 (the typical bias varies from +8% to +12%) under cloud-free and low aerosol load conditions (AOD<0.1). More detailed analysis of absorbing aerosols influence on OMI bias at our station is presented in a companion paper (Cachorro et al., 2010).

scholarly journals UV-Indien Network ground-based measurements: comparisons with satellite and model estimates of UV radiation over the Western Indian Ocean

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Lamy ◽  
Thierry Portafaix ◽  
Colette Brogniez ◽  
Kaisa Lakkala ◽  
Mikko R. A. Pitkänen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Indian Ocean ◽  
Uv Radiation ◽  
Numerical Models ◽  
Western Indian Ocean ◽  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
Sky Conditions

Abstract. As part of the UV-Indien Network, 9 ground-based stations have been equipped with one spectroradiometer, radiometers and all-sky cameras. These stations are homogeneously distributed in 5 countries of the Western Indian Ocean region (Comoros, France, Madagascar, Mauritius and Seychelles), a part of the world where almost no measurements have been made so far. The main scientific objectives of this network are to study the annual and inter-annual variability of the ultraviolet (UV) radiation in this area, to validate the output of numerical models and satellite estimates of ground-based UV measurements, and to monitor UV radiation in the context of climate change and projected ozone depletion in this region. The first results are presented here for the oldest stations (Antananarivo, Anse Quitor, Mahé and Saint-Denis). Ground-based measurements of UV index (UVI) are compared against satellite estimates (Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI), the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) and model forecasts of UVI (Tropospheric Emission Monitoring Internet Service (TEMIS) and Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS). The median relative differences between satellite or model estimates and ground-based measurements of clear-sky UVI range between −34.5 % and 15.8 %. Under clear skies, the smallest UVI median difference between the satellites or model estimates and the measurements of ground-based instruments is found to be 0.02 (TROPOMI), 0.04 (OMI), −0.1 (CAMS) and −0.4 (CAMS) at St-Denis, Antananarivo, Anse Quitor and Mahé respectively. The cloud fraction and UVI diurnal profile are calculated for these four stations. The mean UVI values at local solar noon range between 10 (Antananarivo, Anse Quitor and Saint-Denis) and 14 at Mahé. The mean UVIs in clear-sky conditions are higher than mean UVI in all-sky conditions, although it can still be noted that UVI maxima are higher for all-sky conditions than for clear sky conditions. This is the result of UVI enhancement induced by clouds, observed at these four stations. The greatest increase in UV radiation under cloudy conditions was observed at the Mahé station, with increases of more than 4. The data used in this study is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4572026 (Lamy and Portafaix, 2021).

Validation of ozone monitoring instrument ultraviolet index against ground-based UV index in Kampala, Uganda

2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (28) ◽  
pp. 8537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Muyimbwa ◽  
Arne Dahlback ◽  
Taddeo Ssenyonga ◽  
Yi-Chun Chen ◽  
Jakob J. Stamnes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Uv Index ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
Ultraviolet Index

scholarly journals Measurements of UV irradiance within the area of one satellite pixel

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 3693-3720 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Weihs ◽  
M. Blumthaler ◽  
H. E. Rieder ◽  
A. Kreuter ◽  
S. Simic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reference Data ◽  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Uv Index ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
Uv Irradiance ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
Time Periods ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Sky Conditions ◽  
Better Than

Abstract. A measurement campaign was performed in the region of Vienna and its surroundings from May to July 2007. Within the scope of this campaign erythemal UV was measured at six ground stations within a radius of 30 km. First, the homogeneity of the UV levels within the area of one satellite pixel was studied. Second, the ground UV was compared to ground UV retrieved by the ozone monitoring instrument (OMI) onboard the NASA EOS Aura Spacecraft. During clear sky conditions the difference in erythemal UV measured by the different stations was within the measurement uncertainty of 8%. For partly cloudy conditions and total overcast conditions the discrepancy of momentary values between the stations is up to 200% or even higher. If averages of the UV index over longer time periods are compared the difference between the stations decreases strongly. The agreement is better than 20% within a distance of 10 km between the stations for 3 h averages. The comparison with OMI UV showed for clear sky conditions higher satellite retrieved UV values by on the average approximately 15%. For partly cloudy and overcast conditions the OMI derived surface UV estimates show larger deviation from the ground-based reference data, and even bigger systematic positive bias.

scholarly journals Validación de los datos de radiación solar UV del Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) a partir de medidas con base en tierra en la costa mediterránea

2016 ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Marchetti ◽  
A. R. Esteve ◽  
A. M. Siani ◽  
J. A. Martínez-Lozano ◽  
M. P. Utrillas
Keyword(s):  
Mediterranean Coast ◽  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Seasonal Behavior ◽  
Uv Index ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Measuring Site ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Palma De Mallorca ◽  
Local Noon

<p align="justify">The erythemal UV daily dose (EDD) and the local noon UV Index (UVI) obtained from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), on board NASA’s Aura satellite, have been validated for the period 2005-2013 using ground based measurements at 5 different sites in the Mediterranean coast: Murcia, Valencia, Palma de Mallorca, Barcelona and Rome (where only measurements of the local noon UVI were available). Ground based measurements were made using YES UVB-1 radiometers in Murcia, Valencia, Palma de Mallorca and Barcelona, and a Brewer MKIV 067 spectrophotometer in Rome. The results of the validation showed good agreement between the satellite instrument and the ground based measurements, although the OMI values overestimate the ground based measurements, being the difference between both types of measurements maximum during the spring and summer, and minimum during autumn and winter. The evolution of the EDD shows a clear seasonal behavior for all measuring sites for both, ground based and satellite data, with maximum values in summer (June and July) and minimum values in winter (December and January). A high percentage of cases (&gt;80%) showed minimum differences (0-1 UVI units) between the UVI obtained by OMI and the UVI obtained by ground based instruments for all measuring sites. In every measuring site, high (6-7) or very high (8-10) UVI values are reached for a high percentage of the days of the analyzed period, but very few extreme (≥11) UVI values are reached.</p>

scholarly journals Comparison of UV irradiances from Aura/Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) with Brewer measurements at El Arenosillo (Spain) – Part 1: Analysis of parameter influence

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 5979-5989 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Antón ◽  
V. E. Cachorro ◽  
J. M. Vilaplana ◽  
C. Toledano ◽  
N. A. Krotkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Companion Paper ◽  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Aerosol Effect ◽  
Uv Irradiance ◽  
Crossing Time ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
Absorbing Aerosols ◽  
Sky Conditions ◽  
Parameter Influence

Abstract. The main objective of this study is to compare the erythemal UV irradiance (UVER) and spectral UV irradiances (at 305, 310 and 324 nm) from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) onboard NASA EOS/Aura polar sun-synchronous satellite (launched in July 2004, local equator crossing time 01:45 p.m.) with ground-based measurements from the Brewer spectrophotometer #150 located at El Arenosillo (South of Spain). The analyzed period comprises more than four years, from October 2004 to December 2008. The effects of several factors (clouds, aerosols and the solar elevation) on OMI-Brewer comparisons were analyzed. The proxies used for each factor were: OMI Lambertian Equivalent Reflectivity (LER) at 360 nm (clouds), the aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 440 nm measured from the ground-based Cimel sun-photometer (http://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov), and solar zenith angle (SZA) at OMI overpass time. The comparison for all sky conditions reveals positive biases (OMI higher than Brewer) 12.3% for UVER, 14.2% for UV irradiance at 305 nm, 10.6% for 310 nm and 8.7% for 324 nm. The OMI-Brewer root mean square error (RMSE) is reduced when cloudy cases are removed from the analysis, (e.g., RMSE~20% for all sky conditions and RMSE smaller than 10% for cloud-free conditions). However, the biases remain and even become more significant for the cloud-free cases with respect to all sky conditions. The mentioned overestimation is partially due to aerosol extinction influence. In addition, the differences OMI-Brewer typically decrease with SZA except days with high aerosol loading, when the bias is near constant. The seasonal dependence of the OMI-Brewer difference for cloud-free conditions is driven by aerosol climatology. To account for the aerosol effect, a first evaluation in order to compare with previous TOMS results (Antón et al., 2007) was performed. This comparison shows that the OMI bias is between +14% and +19% for UVER and spectral UV irradiances for moderately-high aerosol load (AOD>0.25). The OMI bias is decreased by a factor of 2 (the typical bias varies from +8% to +12%) under cloud-free and low aerosol load conditions (AOD<0.1). More detailed analysis of absorbing aerosols influence on OMI bias at our station is presented in a companion paper (Cachorro et al., 2010).

Science objectives of the ozone monitoring instrument

2006 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 1199-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.F. Levelt ◽  
E. Hilsenrath ◽  
G.W. Leppelmeier ◽  
G.H.J. van den Oord ◽  
P.K. Bhartia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Ozone Monitoring

scholarly journals Simulation of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument aerosol index using the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System aerosol reanalysis products

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 4121-4134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter R. Colarco ◽  
Santiago Gassó ◽  
Changwoo Ahn ◽  
Virginie Buchard ◽  
Arlindo M. da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Transfer ◽  
Surface Pressure ◽  
Model Atmosphere ◽  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Aerosol Optical Property ◽  
Actual Surface ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Earth Observing System ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
Aerosol Index

Abstract. We provide an analysis of the commonly used Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) aerosol index (AI) product for qualitative detection of the presence and loading of absorbing aerosols. In our analysis, simulated top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiances are produced at the OMI footprints from a model atmosphere and aerosol profile provided by the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS-5) Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications aerosol reanalysis (MERRAero). Having established the credibility of the MERRAero simulation of the OMI AI in a previous paper we describe updates in the approach and aerosol optical property assumptions. The OMI TOA radiances are computed in cloud-free conditions from the MERRAero atmospheric state, and the AI is calculated. The simulated TOA radiances are fed to the OMI near-UV aerosol retrieval algorithms (known as OMAERUV) is compared to the MERRAero calculated AI. Two main sources of discrepancy are discussed: one pertaining to the OMI algorithm assumptions of the surface pressure, which are generally different from what the actual surface pressure of an observation is, and the other related to simplifying assumptions in the molecular atmosphere radiative transfer used in the OMI algorithms. Surface pressure assumptions lead to systematic biases in the OMAERUV AI, particularly over the oceans. Simplifications in the molecular radiative transfer lead to biases particularly in regions of topography intermediate to surface pressures of 600 and 1013.25 hPa. Generally, the errors in the OMI AI due to these considerations are less than 0.2 in magnitude, though larger errors are possible, particularly over land. We recommend that future versions of the OMI algorithms use surface pressures from readily available atmospheric analyses combined with high-spatial-resolution topographic maps and include more surface pressure nodal points in their radiative transfer lookup tables.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document