Comparison of UV index from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) with multi-channel filter radiometers at four sites in the tropics: effects of aerosols and clouds

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 453-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Janjai ◽  
S. Wisitsirikun ◽  
S. Buntoung ◽  
S. Pattarapanitchai ◽  
R. Wattan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Uv Index ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Channel Filter

scholarly journals Monitoring Solar Radiation UV Exposure in the Comoros

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (19) ◽  
pp. 10475
Author(s):  
Kévin Lamy ◽  
Marion Ranaivombola ◽  
Hassan Bencherif ◽  
Thierry Portafaix ◽  
Mohamed Abdoulwahab Toihir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ultraviolet Radiation ◽  
Cloud Cover ◽  
Relative Difference ◽  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Uv Index ◽  
Measurement Campaign ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
Sky Conditions ◽  
Very High

As part of the UV-Indien project, a station for measuring ultraviolet radiation and the cloud fraction was installed in December 2019 in Moroni, the capital of the Comoros, situated on the west coast of the island of Ngazidja. A ground measurement campaign was also carried out on 12 January 2020 during the ascent of Mount Karthala, located in the center of the island of Ngazidja. In addition, satellite estimates (Ozone Monitoring Instrument and TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument) and model outputs (Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service and Tropospheric Ultraviolet Model) were combined for this same region. On the one hand, these different measurements and estimates make it possible to quantify, evaluate, and monitor the health risk linked to exposure to ultraviolet radiation in this region and, on the other, they help to understand how cloud cover influences the variability of UV-radiation on the ground. The measurements of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument onboard the EOS-AURA satellite, being the longest timeseries of ultraviolet measurements available in this region, make it possible to quantify the meteorological conditions in Moroni and to show that more than 80% of the ultraviolet indices are classified as high, and that 60% of these are classified as extreme. The cloud cover measured in Moroni by an All Sky Camera was used to distinguish between the cases of UV index measurements taken under clear or cloudy sky conditions. The ground-based measurements thus made it possible to describe the variability of the diurnal cycle of the UV index and the influence of cloud cover on this parameter. They also permitted the satellite measurements and the results of the simulations to be validated. In clear sky conditions, a relative difference of between 6 and 11% was obtained between satellite or model estimates and ground measurements. The ultraviolet index measurement campaign on Mount Karthala showed maximum one-minute standard erythemal doses at 0.3 J·m−2 and very high daily cumulative erythemal doses, at more than 80 J·m−2. These very high levels are also observed throughout the year and all skin phototypes can exceed the daily erythemal dose threshold, at more than 20 J·m−2.

scholarly journals Ozone profile retrievals from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 2521-2537 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Liu ◽  
P. K. Bhartia ◽  
K. Chance ◽  
R. J. D. Spurr ◽  
T. P. Kurosu
Keyword(s):  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Optimal Estimation ◽  
Anthropogenic Pollution ◽  
Horizontal Resolution ◽  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Ozone Profile ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Middle Stratosphere

Abstract. Ozone profiles from the surface to about 60 km are retrieved from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) ultraviolet radiances using the optimal estimation technique. OMI provides daily ozone profiles for the entire sunlit portion of the earth at a horizontal resolution of 13 km×48 km for the nadir position. The retrieved profiles have sufficient accuracy in the troposphere to see ozone perturbations caused by convection, biomass burning and anthropogenic pollution, and to track their spatiotemporal transport. However, to achieve such accuracy it has been necessary to calibrate OMI radiances carefully (using two days of Aura/Microwave Limb Sounder data taken in the tropics). The retrieved profiles contain ~6–7 degrees of freedom for signal, with 5–7 in the stratosphere and 0–1.5 in the troposphere. Vertical resolution varies from 7–11 km in the stratosphere to 10–14 km in the troposphere. Retrieval precisions range from 1% in the middle stratosphere to 10% in the lower stratosphere and troposphere. Solution errors (i.e., root sum square of precisions and smoothing errors) vary from 1–6% in the middle stratosphere to 6–35% in the troposphere, and are dominated by smoothing errors. Total, stratospheric, and tropospheric ozone columns can be retrieved with solution errors typically in the few Dobson unit range at solar zenith angles less than 80°.

Validation of ozone monitoring instrument ultraviolet index against ground-based UV index in Kampala, Uganda

2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (28) ◽  
pp. 8537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Muyimbwa ◽  
Arne Dahlback ◽  
Taddeo Ssenyonga ◽  
Yi-Chun Chen ◽  
Jakob J. Stamnes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Uv Index ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
Ultraviolet Index

scholarly journals Ozone profile retrievals from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 22693-22738 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Liu ◽  
P. K. Bhartia ◽  
K. Chance ◽  
R. J. D. Spurr ◽  
T. P. Kurosu
Keyword(s):  
Optimal Estimation ◽  
Anthropogenic Pollution ◽  
Horizontal Resolution ◽  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Ozone Profile ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Middle Stratosphere

Abstract. Ozone profiles from the surface to about 60 km are retrieved from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) ultraviolet radiances using the optimal estimation technique. OMI provides daily ozone profiles for the entire sunlit portion of the earth at a horizontal resolution of 13 km×48 km for the nadir position. The retrieved profiles have sufficient accuracy in the troposphere to see ozone perturbations caused by convection, biomass burning and anthropogenic pollution, and to track their spatiotemporal transport. However, to achieve such accuracy it has been necessary to calibrate OMI radiances carefully (using two days of Aura/Microwave Limb Sounder data taken in the tropics). The retrieved profiles contain ~6–7° of freedom for signal, with 5–7 in the stratosphere and 0–1.5 in the troposphere. Vertical resolution varies from 7–11 km in the stratosphere to 10–14 km in the troposphere. Retrieval precisions range from 1% in the middle stratosphere to 10% in the lower stratosphere and troposphere. Solution errors (i.e., root sum square of precisions and smoothing errors) vary from 1–6% in the middle stratosphere to 6–35% in the troposphere, and are dominated by smoothing errors. Total, stratospheric, and tropospheric ozone columns can be retrieved with solution errors typically in the few Dobson unit range at solar zenith angles less than 80°.

scholarly journals Validation of 10-year SAO OMI Ozone Profile (PROFOZ) Product Using Ozonesonde Observations

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanyu Huang ◽  
Xiong Liu ◽  
Kelly Chance ◽  
Kai Yang ◽  
Pawan K. Bhartia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Ozone Profile ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract. We validate the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) ozone-profile (PROFOZ) product from October 2004 through December 2014 retrieved by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (SAO) algorithm against ozonesonde observations. We also evaluate the effects of OMI Row anomaly (RA) on the retrieval by dividing the data set into before and after the occurrence of serious OMI RA, i.e., pre-RA (2004–2008) and post-RA (2009–2014). The retrieval shows good agreement with ozonesondes in the tropics and mid-latitudes and for pressure

scholarly journals Validación de los datos de radiación solar UV del Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) a partir de medidas con base en tierra en la costa mediterránea

2016 ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Marchetti ◽  
A. R. Esteve ◽  
A. M. Siani ◽  
J. A. Martínez-Lozano ◽  
M. P. Utrillas
Keyword(s):  
Mediterranean Coast ◽  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Seasonal Behavior ◽  
Uv Index ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Measuring Site ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Palma De Mallorca ◽  
Local Noon

<p align="justify">The erythemal UV daily dose (EDD) and the local noon UV Index (UVI) obtained from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), on board NASA’s Aura satellite, have been validated for the period 2005-2013 using ground based measurements at 5 different sites in the Mediterranean coast: Murcia, Valencia, Palma de Mallorca, Barcelona and Rome (where only measurements of the local noon UVI were available). Ground based measurements were made using YES UVB-1 radiometers in Murcia, Valencia, Palma de Mallorca and Barcelona, and a Brewer MKIV 067 spectrophotometer in Rome. The results of the validation showed good agreement between the satellite instrument and the ground based measurements, although the OMI values overestimate the ground based measurements, being the difference between both types of measurements maximum during the spring and summer, and minimum during autumn and winter. The evolution of the EDD shows a clear seasonal behavior for all measuring sites for both, ground based and satellite data, with maximum values in summer (June and July) and minimum values in winter (December and January). A high percentage of cases (&gt;80%) showed minimum differences (0-1 UVI units) between the UVI obtained by OMI and the UVI obtained by ground based instruments for all measuring sites. In every measuring site, high (6-7) or very high (8-10) UVI values are reached for a high percentage of the days of the analyzed period, but very few extreme (≥11) UVI values are reached.</p>

Spatiotemporal analysis of solar ultraviolet radiation based on Ozone Monitoring Instrument dataset in Iran, 2005–2019

2021 ◽  
pp. 117643
Author(s):  
Reza Gholamnia ◽  
Mehrnoosh Abtahi ◽  
Sina Dobaradaran ◽  
Ali Koolivand ◽  
Sahand Jorfi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ultraviolet Radiation ◽  
Spatiotemporal Analysis ◽  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Solar Ultraviolet Radiation ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
Solar Ultraviolet

Science objectives of the ozone monitoring instrument

2006 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 1199-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.F. Levelt ◽  
E. Hilsenrath ◽  
G.W. Leppelmeier ◽  
G.H.J. van den Oord ◽  
P.K. Bhartia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Ozone Monitoring

scholarly journals Simulation of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument aerosol index using the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System aerosol reanalysis products

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 4121-4134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter R. Colarco ◽  
Santiago Gassó ◽  
Changwoo Ahn ◽  
Virginie Buchard ◽  
Arlindo M. da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Transfer ◽  
Surface Pressure ◽  
Model Atmosphere ◽  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Aerosol Optical Property ◽  
Actual Surface ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Earth Observing System ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
Aerosol Index

Abstract. We provide an analysis of the commonly used Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) aerosol index (AI) product for qualitative detection of the presence and loading of absorbing aerosols. In our analysis, simulated top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiances are produced at the OMI footprints from a model atmosphere and aerosol profile provided by the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS-5) Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications aerosol reanalysis (MERRAero). Having established the credibility of the MERRAero simulation of the OMI AI in a previous paper we describe updates in the approach and aerosol optical property assumptions. The OMI TOA radiances are computed in cloud-free conditions from the MERRAero atmospheric state, and the AI is calculated. The simulated TOA radiances are fed to the OMI near-UV aerosol retrieval algorithms (known as OMAERUV) is compared to the MERRAero calculated AI. Two main sources of discrepancy are discussed: one pertaining to the OMI algorithm assumptions of the surface pressure, which are generally different from what the actual surface pressure of an observation is, and the other related to simplifying assumptions in the molecular atmosphere radiative transfer used in the OMI algorithms. Surface pressure assumptions lead to systematic biases in the OMAERUV AI, particularly over the oceans. Simplifications in the molecular radiative transfer lead to biases particularly in regions of topography intermediate to surface pressures of 600 and 1013.25 hPa. Generally, the errors in the OMI AI due to these considerations are less than 0.2 in magnitude, though larger errors are possible, particularly over land. We recommend that future versions of the OMI algorithms use surface pressures from readily available atmospheric analyses combined with high-spatial-resolution topographic maps and include more surface pressure nodal points in their radiative transfer lookup tables.

scholarly journals Retrieving vertical ozone profiles from measurements of global spectral irradiance

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4979-4994
Author(s):  
Germar Bernhard ◽  
Irina Petropavlovskikh ◽  
Bernhard Mayer
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Total Ozone ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Spectral Irradiance ◽  
New Method ◽  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Ozone Monitoring ◽  
Vertical Ozone ◽  
Vertical Ozone Profiles

Abstract. A new method is presented to determine vertical ozone profiles from measurements of spectral global (direct Sun plus upper hemisphere) irradiance in the ultraviolet. The method is similar to the widely used Umkehr technique, which inverts measurements of zenith sky radiance. The procedure was applied to measurements of a high-resolution spectroradiometer installed near the centre of the Greenland ice sheet. Retrieved profiles were validated with balloon-sonde observations and ozone profiles from the space-borne Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS). Depending on altitude, the bias between retrieval results presented in this paper and MLS observations ranges between −5 and +3 %. The magnitude of this bias is comparable, if not smaller, to values reported in the literature for the standard Dobson Umkehr method. Total ozone columns (TOCs) calculated from the retrieved profiles agree to within 0.7±2.0 % (±1σ) with TOCs measured by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument on board the Aura satellite. The new method is called the Global-Umkehr method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document