scholarly journals A Brief Online Implicit Bias Intervention for School Mental Health Clinicians

Author(s):  
Freda Liu ◽  
Jessica Coifman ◽  
Erin McRee ◽  
Jeff Stone ◽  
Amy Law ◽  
...  

Clinician bias has been identified as a potential contributor to persistent healthcare disparities across many medical specialties and service settings. Few studies have examined strategies to reduce clinician bias, especially in mental healthcare, despite decades of research evidencing service and outcome disparities in adult and pediatric populations. This manuscript describes an intervention development study and a pilot feasibility trial of the Virtual Implicit Bias Reduction and Neutralization Training (VIBRANT) for mental health clinicians in schools—where most youth in the U.S. access mental healthcare. Clinicians (N = 12) in the feasibility study—a non-randomized open trial—rated VIBRANT as highly usable, appropriate, acceptable, and feasible for their school-based practice. Preliminarily, clinicians appeared to demonstrate improvements in implicit bias knowledge, use of bias-management strategies, and implicit biases (as measured by the Implicit Association Test [IAT]) post-training. Moreover, putative mediators (e.g., clinicians’ VIBRANT strategies use, IAT D scores) and outcome variables (e.g., clinician-rated quality of rapport) generally demonstrated correlations in the expected directions. These pilot results suggest that brief and highly scalable online interventions such as VIBRANT are feasible and promising for addressing implicit bias among healthcare providers (e.g., mental health clinicians) and can have potential downstream impacts on minoritized youth’s care experience.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus W. Haun ◽  
Mariell Hoffmann ◽  
Alina Wildenauer ◽  
Justus Tönnies ◽  
Michel Wensing ◽  
...  

Objective: Despite available effective treatments for mental health disorders, few patients in need receive even the most basic care. Integrated telehealth services may be a viable option to increase access to mental health care. The aim of this qualitative process evaluation embedded in a randomized controlled feasibility trial was to explore health providers’ experiences with a mental health care model integrating mental health specialist video consultations (MHSVC) and primary care.Methods: A qualitative process evaluation focusing on MHSVC in primary care was conducted. In 13 semistructured interviews, we assessed the experience of all mental health specialists, primary care physicians, and medical assistants who participated in the trial. A thematic analysis, focusing on the implementation, mechanisms of impact, and context, was applied to investigate the data.Results: Considering (1) the implementation, participants evaluated the consultations as feasible, easy to use, and time-saving. Concerning (2) the mechanisms of impact, the consultations were regarded as effective for patients. Providers attributed the patients’ improvements to two key aspects: the familiarity of the primary care practice and the fast access to specialist mental healthcare. Mental health specialists observed trustful therapeutic alliances emerging and described their experience as comparable to same-room care. However, compared to same-room care, specialists perceived the video consultations as more challenging and sometimes more exhausting due to the additional effort required for establishing therapeutic alliances. Regarding (3) the intervention’s context, shorter travel distances positively affected the implementation, while technical failures, i.e. poor Internet connectivity, emerged as the main barrier.Conclusions: MHSVCs in primary care are feasible and successful in improving access to mental healthcare for patients. To optimize the engagement and comfort of both patients and health providers, future work should focus on empirical determinants for establishing robust therapeutic alliances with patients receiving video consultations (e.g., leveraging nonverbal cues for therapeutic purposes).


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e047829
Author(s):  
Markus W Haun ◽  
Mariell Hoffmann ◽  
Alina Wildenauer ◽  
Justus Tönnies ◽  
Michel Wensing ◽  
...  

ObjectiveDespite available effective treatments for mental health disorders, few patients in need receive even the most basic care. Integrated telepsychiatry services may be a viable option to increase access to mental healthcare. The aim of this qualitative process evaluation embedded in a randomised controlled feasibility trial was to explore health providers’ experiences with a mental healthcare model integrating mental health specialist video consultations (MHSVC) and primary care.MethodsA qualitative process evaluation focusing on MHSVC in primary care was conducted. In 13 semistructured interviews, we assessed the experience of all mental health specialists, primary care physicians and medical assistants who participated in the trial. A thematic analysis, focusing on the implementation, mechanisms of impact and context, was applied to investigate the data.ResultsConsidering (1) the implementation, participants evaluated the consultations as feasible, easy to use and time saving. Concerning (2) the mechanisms of impact, the consultations were regarded as effective for patients. Providers attributed the patients’ improvements to two key aspects: the familiarity of the primary care practice and the fast access to specialist mental healthcare. Mental health specialists observed trustful therapeutic alliances emerging and described their experience as comparable to same-room care. However, compared with same-room care, specialists perceived the video consultations as more challenging and sometimes more exhausting due to the additional effort required for establishing therapeutic alliances. Regarding (3) the intervention’s context, shorter travel distances for patients positively affected the implementation, while technical failures, that is, poor Internet connectivity, emerged as the main barrier.ConclusionsMHSVCs in primary care are feasible and successful in improving access to mental healthcare for patients. To optimise engagement and comfort of both patients and health providers, future work should focus on empirical determinants for establishing robust therapeutic alliances with patients receiving MHSVC (eg, leveraging non-verbal cues for therapeutic purposes).Trial registration numberDRKS00015812; Results.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom L Osborn ◽  
Christine Wasanga

-Adolescent mental health problems—which are associated with many negative life outcomes—are prevalent in low-income regions such as those in Sub Saharan Africa (SSA) yet many youths suffering from these problems never get treatment.-Existing treatments are inaccessible to SSA youths because they are long, costly, and require expert delivery in a setting where incomes are low, and a paucity of caregivers exist and where social stigma limits help-seeking.-Most of the efforts to develop interventions for youth mental have been led by researchers from Western high-income countries and can be criticized as socio-culturally inappropriate and costly. -To guide intervention development efforts, we propose a four-step approach that encourages researchers to develop mental health interventions that are simple, stigma-free, scalable and school-based. Through this four-step approach, researchers can expand mental healthcare access in SSA by developing interventions that circumvent existing barriers.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shereen Khan ◽  
Jennifer D. Shapka ◽  
Jose Domene ◽  
Danielle M. Law

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 5-11
Author(s):  
I. Großimlinghaus ◽  
J. Zielasek ◽  
W. Gaebel

Summary Background: The development of guidelines is an important and common method to assure and improve quality in mental healthcare in European countries. While guidelines have to fulfill predefined criteria such as methodological accuracy of evidence retrieval and assessment, and stakeholder involvement, the development of guidance was not standardized yet. Aim: In 2008, the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) initiated the EPA Guidance project in order to provide guidance in the field of European psychiatry and related fields for topics that are not dealt with by guideline developers – for instance due to lack of evidence or lack of funding. The first three series of EPA Guidance deal with diverse topics that are relevant to European mental healthcare, such as quality assurance for mental health services, post-graduate training in mental healthcare, trust in mental health services and mental health promotion. Results: EPA Guidance recommendations address current and future challenges for European psychiatry. They are developed in accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) European Mental Health Action Plan.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document