scholarly journals Correction: Furnier et al. Translating Molecular Technologies into Routine Newborn Screening Practice. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2020, 6, 80

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Furnier ◽  
Maureen S. Durkin ◽  
Mei W. Baker

In the original article [...]

1987 ◽  
Vol 77 (12) ◽  
pp. 1528-1531 ◽  
Author(s):  
J M Tuerck ◽  
N R Buist ◽  
M R Skeels ◽  
R S Miyahira ◽  
P G Beach

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Shu-Chuan Chiang ◽  
Yin-Hsiu Chien ◽  
Kai-Ling Chang ◽  
Ni-Chung Lee ◽  
Wuh-Liang Hwu

Pompe disease Newborn screening (NBS) aims at diagnosing patients with infantile-onset Pompe disease (IOPD) early enough so a timely treatment can be instituted. Since 2015, the National Taiwan University NBS Center has changed the method for Pompe disease NBS from fluorometric assay to tandem mass assay. From 2016 to 2019, 14 newborns were reported as high-risk for Pompe disease at a median age of 9 days (range 6–13), and 18 were with a borderline risk at a median age of 13 days (9–28). None of the borderline risks were IOPD patients. Among the 14 at a high-risk of Pompe disease, four were found to have cardiomyopathy, and six were classified as potential late-onset Pompe disease. The four classic IOPD newborns, three of the four having at least one allele of the cross-reactive immunologic material (CRIM)-positive variant, started enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) at a median age of 9 days (8–14). Western Blot analysis and whole gene sequencing confirmed the CRIM-positive status in all cases. Here, we focus on the patient without the known CRIM-positive variant. Doing ERT before knowing the CRIM status created a dilemma in the decision and was discussed in detail. Our Pompe disease screening and diagnostic program successfully detected and treated patients with IOPD in time. However, the timely exclusion of a CRIM-negative status, which is rare in the Chinese population, is still a challenging task.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Furnier ◽  
Maureen S. Durkin ◽  
Mei W. Baker

As biotechnologies advance and better treatment regimens emerge, there is a trend toward applying more advanced technologies and adding more conditions to the newborn screening (NBS) panel. In the current Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP), all conditions but one, congenital hypothyroidism, have well-defined genes and inheritance patterns, so it is beneficial to incorporate molecular testing in NBS when it is necessary and appropriate. Indeed, the applications of molecular technologies have taken NBS to previously uncharted territory. In this paper, based on our own program experience and what has been reported in the literature, we describe current practices regarding the applications of molecular technologies in routine NBS practice in the era of genomic and precision medicine.


2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 39-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Balk

The use of mass spectrometry in newborn screening has made possible the early diagnosis of various metabolic diseases. However, because aminoglycosides, blood transfusions, nothing by mouth status, and the presence of heparinized solutions all affect the results of newborn screens, neonates in critical care units who receive such treatments ought to be screened under specific practice guidelines. Many of the devastating sequelae of metabolic diseases are preventable if diagnosed early, making the development of such practice guidelines for use in the NICU especially important.Additionally, no standardized practice guidelines presently exist for determining who, whether birth hospital or primary care provider, is responsible for notifying the parent of a positive result and thus ensuring invaluable follow-up care. Such standardized guidelines for screening practice are needed to prevent devastating neurologic sequelae for children whose condition may otherwise escape unaddressed. Newborn screening guidelines developed at Johns Hopkins Hospital and Memorial Regional Hospital provide a helpful starting point.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (14) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Dee Naquin Shafer
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
MARK S. LESNEY

2012 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
R. RODNEY HOWELL
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 22-23
Author(s):  
GREG FEERO ◽  
R. RODNEY HOWELL
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document