scholarly journals Is Periodontitis a Predictor for an Adverse Outcome in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting? A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 818
Author(s):  
Stefan Reichert ◽  
Susanne Schulz ◽  
Lisa Friebe ◽  
Michael Kohnert ◽  
Julia Grollmitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Artery Bypass Grafting ◽  
Cabg Surgery

Periodontitis is a risk factor for atherosclerosis and coronary vascular disease (CVD). This research evaluated the relationship between periodontal conditions and postoperative outcome in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A total of 101 patients with CVD (age 69 years, 88.1% males) and the necessity of CABG surgery were included. Periodontal diagnosis was made according to the guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2007). Additionally, periodontal epithelial surface area (PESA) and periodontal inflamed surface area (PISA) were determined. Multivariate survival analyses were carried out after a one-year follow-up period with Cox regression. All study subjects suffered from periodontitis (28.7% moderate, 71.3% severe). During the follow-up period, 14 patients (13.9%) experienced a new cardiovascular event (11 with angina pectoris, 2 with cardiac decompensation, and 1 with cardiac death). Severe periodontitis was not significant associated with the incidence of new events (adjusted hazard ratio, HR = 2.6; p = 0.199). Other risk factors for new events were pre-existing peripheral arterial disease (adjusted HR = 4.8, p = 0.030) and a history of myocardial infarction (HR = 6.1, p = 0.002). Periodontitis was not found to be an independent risk factor for the incidence of new cardiovascular events after CABG surgery.

Ten-Year Outcome Analysis of Off-Pump Sequential Grafting: Single Surgeon, Single Center Experience

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahzad G. Raja ◽  
Kareem Salhiyyah ◽  
Manoraj Navaratnarajah ◽  
Muhammad Umar Rafiq ◽  
Jeremy Felderhof ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Artery Bypass Grafting ◽  
Off Pump ◽  
Pump Coronary Artery Bypass

<p><b>Objectives:</b> Despite increasing recognition that off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and sequential grafting strategy individually are associated with improved outcomes, concerns persist regarding the safety and efficacy of combining these 2 techniques. We compared in-hospital and midterm outcomes for off-pump multivessel sequential and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> From September 1998 to September 2008, 689 consecutive patients received off-pump multivessel sequential coronary artery bypass grafting performed by a single surgeon. These patients were propensity matched to 689 patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting without sequential anastomoses. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected perioperative data was performed. In addition, medical notes and charts of all the study patients were reviewed. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.1 � 2.0 years.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The major in-hospital clinical outcomes in the sequential and control groups were found to be similar. After adjusting for clinical covariates, sequential grafting was not an independent predictor of in-hospital adverse events (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.50; <i>P</i> = .31), medium-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06-1.32; <i>P</i> = .92), and readmission to hospital (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.96-1.20; <i>P</i> = .80). Sequential grafting was an independent predictor of receiving more than 3 distal anastomoses (OR, 7.46; 95% CI, 4.27-11.45; <i>P</i> < .0001). Risk-adjusted survival was 89% for sequential grafting patients and 88% for conventional grafting patients (<i>P</i> = .96) during the medium-term follow-up.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our analysis confirms the short- and midterm safety and efficacy of off-pump sequential coronary artery bypass grafting.</p>

Abstract 120: Regional Variation in Infection Rates after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Likosky ◽  
Mallika Kommareddi ◽  
Theodore Boeve ◽  
Steven Harrington ◽  
Robert Holmes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Case Mix ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Artery Bypass Grafting ◽  
Cabg Surgery ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Cannulation Site

Introduction: Healthcare acquired infections (HAIs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. Prior work has identified a number of patient-related risk factors associated with HAIs. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that rates of HAIs would differ across institutions, in part attributed to differences in case mix. Methods: We enrolled 27,663 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery at 33 medical centers in Michigan between 1/1/2008 - 6/30/2012. Overall HAIs included pneumonia, sepsis/septicemia, deep sternal wound, thoracotomy, and harvest/cannulation site infections. We excluded patients presenting with endocarditis. Predicted rates of HAIs were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Overall rate of HAI was 5.3% (1454 of 27,663) [pneumonia: 3.7% (n=1020), sepsis/septicemia: 1.0% (n=266), deep sternal wound: 0.7% (n=184), harvest/cannulation site: 0.6% (n=163), multiple infections: 0.6% (n=169)]. While predicted risk of HAI differed in absolute terms by 4.1% across centers (4.2% - 8.3%, min:max), observed rates varied from 1.3% to 20.8%, p<0.01 (Figure). Conclusions: There was a 16-fold variability in rates of HAIs across medical centers among patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery. This variability could not be explained by patient case mix. Future work should focus on the impact of other factors (e.g. organizational and systems of clinical care) on risk of HAIs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document