scholarly journals Color Image Complexity versus Over-Segmentation: A Preliminary Study on the Correlation between Complexity Measures and Number of Segments

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihai Ivanovici ◽  
Radu-Mihai Coliban ◽  
Cosmin Hatfaludi ◽  
Irina Emilia Nicolae

It is said that image segmentation is a very difficult or complex task. First of all, we emphasize the subtle difference between the notions of difficulty and complexity. Then, in this article, we focus on the question of how two widely used color image complexity measures correlate with the number of segments resulting in over-segmentation. We study the evolution of both the image complexity measures and number of segments as the image complexity is gradually decreased by means of low-pass filtering. In this way, we tackle the possibility of predicting the difficulty of color image segmentation based on image complexity measures. We analyze the complexity of images from the point of view of color entropy and color fractal dimension and for color fractal images and the Berkeley data set we correlate these two metrics with the segmentation results, more specifically the number of quasi-flat zones and the number of JSEG regions in the resulting segmentation map. We report on our experimental results and draw conclusions.

Author(s):  
Rajesh Kumar ◽  
Rajeev Srivastava ◽  
Subodh Srivastava

The color image segmentation is a fundamental requirement for microscopic biopsy image analysis and disease detection. In this paper, a hybrid combination of color k-means and marker control watershed based segmentation approach is proposed to be applied for the segmentation of cell and nuclei of microscopic biopsy images. The proposed approach is tested on breast cancer microscopic data set with ROI segmented ground truth images. Finally, the results obtained from proposed framework are compared with the results of popular segmentation algorithms such as Fuzzy c-means, color k-means, texture based segmentation as well as adaptive thresholding approaches. The experimental analysis shows that the proposed approach is providing better results in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, FPR (false positive rate), global consistency error (GCE), probability random index (PRI), and variance of information (VOI) as compared to other segmentation approaches.


2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 807-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Dong YUE ◽  
Duo-Qian MIAO ◽  
Cai-Ming ZHONG

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 2074-2076
Author(s):  
Hua LI ◽  
Ming-xin ZHANG ◽  
Jing-long ZHENG

1997 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 269-274
Author(s):  
R. Boussarsar ◽  
P. Martin ◽  
R. Lecordier ◽  
M. Ketata

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document