scholarly journals Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown in Eating Disorders: A Multicentre Collaborative International Study

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Isabel Baenas ◽  
Mikel Etxandi ◽  
Lucero Munguía ◽  
Roser Granero ◽  
Gemma Mestre-Bach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Psychological Functioning ◽  
Cultural Context ◽  
International Study ◽  
Asian Countries ◽  
Therapeutic Approaches ◽  
General Psychopathology ◽  
Feeding And Eating Disorders ◽  
Vulnerable Patients ◽  
Mental Health Patients

Background. The COVID-19 lockdown has had a significant impact on mental health. Patients with eating disorders (ED) have been particularly vulnerable. Aims. (1) To explore changes in eating-related symptoms and general psychopathology during lockdown in patients with an ED from various European and Asian countries; and (2) to assess differences related to diagnostic ED subtypes, age, and geography. Methods. The sample comprised 829 participants, diagnosed with an ED according to DSM-5 criteria from specialized ED units in Europe and Asia. Participants were assessed using the COVID-19 Isolation Scale (CIES). Results. Patients with binge eating disorder (BED) experienced the highest impact on weight and ED symptoms in comparison with other ED subtypes during lockdown, whereas individuals with other specified feeding and eating disorders (OFSED) had greater deterioration in general psychological functioning than subjects with other ED subtypes. Finally, Asian and younger individuals appeared to be more resilient. Conclusions. The psychopathological changes in ED patients during the COVID-19 lockdown varied by cultural context and individual variation in age and ED diagnosis. Clinical services may need to target preventive measures and adapt therapeutic approaches for the most vulnerable patients.

Evidence-Based Treatment for the Eating Disorders

2010 ◽  
pp. 451-451
Author(s):  
Phillipa J. Hay ◽  
Angélica de M. Claudino
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Good Evidence ◽  
Distinct Advantage ◽  
Specialist Care ◽  
Feeding And Eating Disorders ◽  
Online Therapies ◽  
Primary Care Practitioners

This chapter comprises a focused review of the best available evidence for psychological and pharmacological treatments of choice for anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), binge eating disorder (BED), and other specified and unspecified feeding and eating disorders (OSFED and UFED), discusses the role of primary care and online therapies, and presents treatment algorithms. In AN, although there is consensus on the need for specialist care that includes nutritional rehabilitation in addition to psychological therapy, no single approach has yet been found to offer a distinct advantage. In contrast, manualized cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for BN has attained “first-line” treatment status with a stronger evidence base than other psychotherapies. Similarly, CBT has a good evidence base in treatment of BED and for BN, and BED has been successfully adapted into less intensive and non-specialist forms. Behavioral and pharmacological weight loss management in treatment of co-morbid obesity/overweight and BED may be helpful in the short term, but long-term maintenance of effects is unclear. Primary care practitioners are in a key role, both with regard to providing care and with coordination and initiation of specialist care. There is an emerging evidence base for online therapies in BN and BED where access to care is delayed or problematic.

Evidence-Based Treatment for the Eating Disorders

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillipa J. Hay ◽  
Angélica de M. Claudino
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Good Evidence ◽  
Distinct Advantage ◽  
Specialist Care ◽  
Feeding And Eating Disorders ◽  
Online Therapies ◽  
Primary Care Practitioners

This chapter comprises a focused review of the best available evidence for psychological and pharmacological treatments of choice for anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), binge eating disorder (BED), and other specified and unspecified feeding and eating disorders (OSFED and UFED), discusses the role of primary care and online therapies, and presents treatment algorithms. In AN, although there is consensus on the need for specialist care that includes nutritional rehabilitation in addition to psychological therapy, no single approach has yet been found to offer a distinct advantage. In contrast, manualized cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for BN has attained “first-line” treatment status with a stronger evidence base than other psychotherapies. Similarly, CBT has a good evidence base in treatment of BED and for BN, and BED has been successfully adapted into less intensive and non-specialist forms. Behavioral and pharmacological weight loss management in treatment of co-morbid obesity/overweight and BED may be helpful in the short term, but long-term maintenance of effects is unclear. Primary care practitioners are in a key role, both with regard to providing care and with coordination and initiation of specialist care. There is an emerging evidence base for online therapies in BN and BED where access to care is delayed or problematic.

Feeding and Eating Disorders

Psychiatry ◽  
2015 ◽  
pp. 1231-1249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah R. Glasofer ◽  
Evelyn Attia ◽  
B. Timothy Walsh
Keyword(s):  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Feeding And Eating Disorders

FEEDING AND EATING DISORDERS MANAGEMENT IN ADOLESCENCE - COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL APPROACH

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-182
Author(s):  
Cláudia Gomes Cano ◽  
Sandra Pires ◽  
Ana Catarina Serrano
Keyword(s):  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Adult Life ◽  
Behavioral Approach ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Young Population ◽  
Behaviour Therapy ◽  
Feeding And Eating Disorders ◽  
Cognitive Behaviour

Feeding and Eating Disorders (FED) are amongst the most frequent and severe psychiatric disorders in adolescence. These disorders can be considered an important public health issue, since they mostly affect a young population with potential significant functional impact at a young age and throughout adult life. Cognitive behavioral approach has demonstrated evidence as one of the empirically validated reference treatments for all FED. This article aims to perform a narrative review of the cognitive behavioral conceptualization and treatment approach of FED. Enhanced Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CCT-E) is the treatment of choice for adolescents with FED when Family Therapy is contraindicated, not accepted, or not effective. Furthermore, the importance of an early intervention is emphasized, since it has been demonstrated that CCT-E has more effective results and in a shorter period of time in adolescents compared with an adult population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document