scholarly journals Diesel or Electric Jeepney? A Case Study of Transport Investment in the Philippines Using the Real Options Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Casper Boongaling Agaton ◽  
Charmaine Samala Guno ◽  
Resy Ordona Villanueva ◽  
Riza Ordona Villanueva
Keyword(s):  
Real Options ◽  
Traffic Congestion ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Public Utility ◽  
Optimal Decision ◽  
Decision Strategy ◽  
The Real ◽  
Real Options Approach ◽  
The Government

The Philippines is moving towards a more sustainable public transport system by introducing a public utility vehicle (PUV) modernization program with electric jeepneys (e-jeepneys) and modernized diesel jeepneys. Despite its potential to address problems related to air pollution, traffic congestion, dependence on fuel imports, and carbon emissions, transport groups show resistance to the adoption of the government program due to costs and investment risk issues. This study aims to guide transport operators in making investment decisions between the modernized diesel jeepney and the e-jeepney fleet. Applying the real options approach (ROA), this research evaluates option values and optimal investment strategies under uncertainties in diesel prices, jeepney base fare price, electricity prices, and government subsidy. The optimization results reveal a better opportunity to invest in the e-jeepney fleet in all scenarios analyzed. Results also show a more optimal decision strategy to invest in the e-jeepney immediately in the current business environment, as delaying or postponing investment may incur opportunity losses. To make the adoption of the e-jeepney more attractive to transport operators, this study further suggests government actions to increase the amount of subsidy and base fares, establish public charging stations, and continue efforts to rely on cleaner, cheaper, and renewable sources of electricity.

Investment decisions in hog finishing: an application of the real options approach

2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Odening ◽  
Oliver Mußhoff ◽  
Alfons Balmann
Keyword(s):  
Real Options ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
The Real ◽  
Real Options Approach

Research on the Real Options in Investment Decision of Waterway Infrastructure Construction

2013 ◽  
Vol 734-737 ◽  
pp. 1617-1620
Author(s):  
Wei Jin
Keyword(s):  
Real Options ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Emissions ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Real Option ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Energy Utilization ◽  
Real Options Theory ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Government ◽  
Real Option Method

Developing the waterway infrastructure construction can improve the efficiency of energy utilization, reduce the energy consumption intensity and carbon dioxide emissions. Till the year 2020, China plan to complete 19,000 kilometers high grade channel. Construction of water infrastructure construction requires a large capital investment. However, the main financial source of funding the construction of transportation infrastructure at present in China is special financial allocation of the government. The unitary financing structure as well as the funding pressure has leaded to some serious financing problems. This paper applied the real options theory to the waterway infrastructure construction financing, analyzed the limitations of the NPV method and the advantages of real option method in investment decision of waterway infrastructure construction, and took an example to show its feasibility.

scholarly journals Real Options and Discounted Cash Flow Analysis to Assess Strategic Investment Projects

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnė Pivorienė
Keyword(s):  
Real Options ◽  
Cash Flow ◽  
Flow Analysis ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Strategic Decision ◽  
Discounted Cash Flow ◽  
Strategic Investment ◽  
Investment Projects ◽  
Real Options Approach

Abstract In today’s uncertain and highly competitive business environment, the difficulty to make strategic investment decisions is growing. The dominant discounted cash flow analysis requires the assumption of perfect certainty of project cash flows. However, under uncertainty traditional DCF approach falls short of providing adequate strategic decision support, and this situation demands new methods for investment evaluation. Real options approach (ROA) has shown the potential for valuation of strategic corporate investment decisions and managerial flexibility in situations of high uncertainty. Under ROA, projects are viewed as real options that can be valued using financial option pricing techniques. This framework allows their owner to keep investment options open and to benefit from the upside potential of an opportunity while controlling the downside risk. The main aim of this research is to investigate the feasibility of real options approach and traditional DCF analysis for assessment of strategic investment projects under environmental uncertainty.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document