scholarly journals Real Options and Discounted Cash Flow Analysis to Assess Strategic Investment Projects

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnė Pivorienė

Abstract In today’s uncertain and highly competitive business environment, the difficulty to make strategic investment decisions is growing. The dominant discounted cash flow analysis requires the assumption of perfect certainty of project cash flows. However, under uncertainty traditional DCF approach falls short of providing adequate strategic decision support, and this situation demands new methods for investment evaluation. Real options approach (ROA) has shown the potential for valuation of strategic corporate investment decisions and managerial flexibility in situations of high uncertainty. Under ROA, projects are viewed as real options that can be valued using financial option pricing techniques. This framework allows their owner to keep investment options open and to benefit from the upside potential of an opportunity while controlling the downside risk. The main aim of this research is to investigate the feasibility of real options approach and traditional DCF analysis for assessment of strategic investment projects under environmental uncertainty.


Water Policy ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 481-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasios Michailidis ◽  
Konstadinos Mattas ◽  
Diamantis Karamouzis

This article extends the evaluation techniques of an irrigation dam in northern Greece, called “Petrenia”, by comparing the real options approach along with, a traditional one, the discount cash flow. By introducing first a Monte Carlo simulation, the various uncertainty factors can be simulated and alternative value options can be computed, feeding them later in the real options model. Results from the case study in Greece clearly demonstrate that the irrigation dam can be classified as a profitable investment, by applying traditional discount cash flow analysis, while by applying the real options approach the project cannot be classified as profitable. Taking into consideration the uncertainty factors, the real options approach reveals that the investment could be postponed and decision makers can keep the option of investing open. Sequentially, discount cash flow analysis accompanied by the real options approach facilitates decision making and improves the investment assessment analysis. In this particular project assessment, two uncertainty factors, variation in dam capacity and water price, restrict the profitability of the irrigation dam, according to the results of the real options approach.



Author(s):  
Гераськина ◽  
A. Geraskina

The method of real options is one of the new approaches to estimate investment projects’ cost and it is an important addition to discounted cash flow method. Real option significantly increases the efficiency of the project due to the possibility of decision-making during its implementation. This aspect is especially important in unstable environmental conditions. The main differences between the financial and real options are presented. The differences of valuation of investment projects by the real options method and net present value are examined. The article presents the types of real options, as well as the methods of calculating the option price.



2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashok Banerjee

Valuing a research-driven firm is a challenging task. The static discounted cash flow (DCF) model fails to capture the value of R&D options. Pharmaceutical companies are, by their very nature, dependent on research products. These companies face an uncertain business environment. Roughly, one out of 10,000 explored chemicals becomes a prescription drug and only 30 per cent of drugs succeed in recovering their costs. Since the future of current R&D investments is uncertain, the traditional cash flow method may return a negative value of the future growth plan. Various studies have shown that the concept of real options can be applied to capture the value of R&D investments. Options give their owner the right (and not the obligation) to buy or sell assets at a pre-determined price (called the exercise or strike price) on or before an agreed expiry date. The underlying asset for which the option contract is made can be financial instruments (e.g., shares) or investment projects (e.g., expansion or acquisition or R&D investments). If the underlying assets are shares, such options are called ‘stock options.’ On the other hand, options on investment projects are known as ‘real options. This study shows how we can value a pharmaceutical company with potential research products in the pipeline. The traditional DCF method could hardly explain around 39 per cent of the market capitalization of the company. This is because the market price has already factored in the growth options — the possible growth from drug discovery initiatives, growth from joint venture initiatives, etc. The cash flow model fails to capture these future values. Real options model to value research products has significantly improved the valuation. We show that the underlying value of R&D investments is best recognized in option pricing model. With Indian patent laws following the footsteps of the WTO prescriptions (from 2005), Indian pharmaceutical companies cannot avoid making significant investments in R&D. The study reveals that unless the compounds under research have potential to be breakthrough drugs, it may be difficult to recover R&D investments. Therefore, attaining a reasonable global market share is critical for Indian pharmaceutical companies to exercise options. The Indian market for any high-investment research drug is comparatively small. Given the huge R&D costs of new drug discovery, it is impossible for a domestic manufacturer to recover the R&D costs from domestic sales. Capturing export market is vital to the success of any new drug. So far, not a single new drug has been fully developed in India (right from discovery to successful completion of all trials). Indian companies have acquired generic products, discovered alternative process of manufacturing a patented drug, and licensed out the compounds to multinational companies for clinical trials and commercialization. They have not taken the risk of completing the entire process of drug discovery on their own. But, things are changing now. Indian companies have realized the importance of having a strong R&D base and we may see some blockbuster drugs being manufactured in India. This, we hope, will further popularize the real options model of valuing R&D investments



2010 ◽  
Vol 105-106 ◽  
pp. 798-801
Author(s):  
Bao Cheng He ◽  
Hong Tao Jiang ◽  
Shu Zhi Yao ◽  
Bao Yuan He

The success of ceramic companies is highly dependent on research and development (R&D). Thus, a pivotal aim of management is to allocate resources to the best scientific and financial R&D projects. But the valuation of ceramic R&D is a difficult task for managers. The conventional discounted cash flow (DCF) methods fail to consider the value of managerial flexibility provided by R&D projects. Real options Analysis (ROA) offers a superior way of capturing the value of flexibility. It enables decision-maker to value projects more accurately by incorporating managerial flexibilities into the valuation model. However, ROA can’t effectively deal with the volatility of parameters in itself under high uncertain circumstance. In view of the limitation of ROA, this paper uses Monte Carlo simulation to solve the parameters volatility problems. In the end, the case study proves that Monte Carlo simulation can improve R&D investment decisions, especially for highly unpredictable ceramic R&D projects.



2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Odening ◽  
Oliver Mußhoff ◽  
Alfons Balmann


1976 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 595-611
Author(s):  
Richard Briller


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document