AbstractTranscranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique consisting in the application of weak electric currents on the scalp. Although previous studies have demonstrated the clinical value of tDCS for modulating sensory, motor, and cognitive functions, there are still huge gaps in the knowledge of the underlying physiological mechanisms. To define the immediate impact as well as the after-effects of tDCS on sensory processing, we first performed electrophysiological recordings in primary somatosensory cortex (S1) of alert mice during and after administration of S1-tDCS, and followed up with immunohistochemical analysis of the stimulated brain regions. During the application of cathodal and anodal transcranial currents we observed polarity-specific bidirectional changes in the N1 component of the sensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) and associated gamma oscillations. Regarding the long-term effects observed after 20 min of tDCS, cathodal stimulation produced significant after-effects including a decreased SEP amplitude for up to 30 min, a power reduction in the 20-80 Hz range and a decrease in gamma event related synchronization (ERS). In contrast, no significant long-term changes in SEP amplitude or power analysis were observed after anodal stimulation except for a significant increase in gamma ERS after tDCS cessation. The polarity-specific differences of these long-term effects were corroborated by immunohistochemical analysis, which revealed an unbalance of GAD 65-67 immunoreactivity between the stimulated vs. non-stimulated S1 region only after cathodal tDCS. These results highlight the differences between immediate and long-term effects of tDCS, as well as the asymmetric long-term changes induced by anodal and cathodal stimulation.Significance StatementHere we provide a first glimpse at the immediate and long-term impact of tDCS on neural processing in alert animals. The obtained results highlight the complexity of tDCS-associated effects, which include both bidirectional as well as asymmetrical modulation depending on the polarity of the stimulation. This asymmetry suggests the implication of different mechanisms underlying the long-term effects induced by anodal and cathodal transcranial currents. Identifying and defining these effects and its associated mechanisms is crucial to help design effective protocols for clinical applications.