scholarly journals Faculty Opinions recommendation of Neural basis of the cognitive map: path integration does not require hippocampus or entorhinal cortex.

Author(s):  
Howard Eichenbaum
2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 663-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce L. McNaughton ◽  
Francesco P. Battaglia ◽  
Ole Jensen ◽  
Edvard I Moser ◽  
May-Britt Moser

1996 ◽  
Vol 199 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-164
Author(s):  
DF Sherry

Few ideas have had a greater impact on the study of navigation at the middle scale than the theory of the cognitive map. As papers in this section show, current views of the cognitive map range from complete rejection of the idea (Bennett, 1996) to new proposals for the behavioural and neural bases of the cognitive map (Gallistel and Cramer, 1996; McNaughton et al. 1996). The papers in this section also make it clear that path integration has taken centre stage in theorizing about navigation at the middle scale. Path integration is the use of information generated by locomotion to determine the current distance and direction to the origin of the path. Etienne (1980) provided one of the first experimental demonstrations of path integration by a vertebrate, and in this section Etienne et al. (1996) describe recent research with animals and humans on the interaction between path integration and landmark information. Path integration is also the fundamental means of navigation in the model described by Gallistel and Cramer (1996). McNaughton et al. (1996) suggest that the neural basis of path integration is found in the place cells and head direction cells of the hippocampus and associated brain regions.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seongmin A. Park ◽  
Douglas S. Miller ◽  
Erie D. Boorman

ABSTRACTGeneralizing experiences to guide decision making in novel situations is a hallmark of flexible behavior. It has been hypothesized such flexibility depends on a cognitive map of an environment or task, but directly linking the two has proven elusive. Here, we find that discretely sampled abstract relationships between entities in an unseen two-dimensional (2-D) social hierarchy are reconstructed into a unitary 2-D cognitive map in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. We further show that humans utilize a grid-like code in several brain regions, including entorhinal cortex and medial prefrontal cortex, for inferred direct trajectories between entities in the reconstructed abstract space during discrete decisions. Moreover, these neural grid-like codes in the entorhinal cortex predict neural decision value computations in the medial prefrontal cortex and temporoparietal junction area during choice. Collectively, these findings show that grid-like codes are used by the human brain to infer novel solutions, even in abstract and discrete problems, and suggest a general mechanism underpinning flexible decision making and generalization.


2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (11) ◽  
pp. 2824-2829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Hoinville ◽  
Rüdiger Wehner

In the last decades, desert ants have become model organisms for the study of insect navigation. In finding their way, they use two major navigational routines: path integration using a celestial compass and landmark guidance based on sets of panoramic views of the terrestrial environment. It has been claimed that this information would enable the insect to acquire and use a centralized cognitive map of its foraging terrain. Here, we present a decentralized architecture, in which the concurrently operating path integration and landmark guidance routines contribute optimally to the directions to be steered, with “optimal” meaning maximizing the certainty (reliability) of the combined information. At any one time during its journey, the animal computes a path integration (global) vector and landmark guidance (local) vector, in which the length of each vector is proportional to the certainty of the individual estimates. Hence, these vectors represent the limited knowledge that the navigator has at any one place about the direction of the goal. The sum of the global and local vectors indicates the navigator’s optimal directional estimate. Wherever applied, this decentralized model architecture is sufficient to simulate the results of quite a number of diverse cue-conflict experiments, which have recently been performed in various behavioral contexts by different authors in both desert ants and honeybees. They include even those experiments that have deliberately been designed by former authors to strengthen the evidence for a metric cognitive map in bees.


2020 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 101307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilde Bostelmann ◽  
Pierre Lavenex ◽  
Pamela Banta Lavenex

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document