Faculty Opinions recommendation of Path integration and the neural basis of the 'cognitive map'.

Author(s):  
John Lisman
2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 663-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce L. McNaughton ◽  
Francesco P. Battaglia ◽  
Ole Jensen ◽  
Edvard I Moser ◽  
May-Britt Moser

1996 ◽  
Vol 199 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-164
Author(s):  
DF Sherry

Few ideas have had a greater impact on the study of navigation at the middle scale than the theory of the cognitive map. As papers in this section show, current views of the cognitive map range from complete rejection of the idea (Bennett, 1996) to new proposals for the behavioural and neural bases of the cognitive map (Gallistel and Cramer, 1996; McNaughton et al. 1996). The papers in this section also make it clear that path integration has taken centre stage in theorizing about navigation at the middle scale. Path integration is the use of information generated by locomotion to determine the current distance and direction to the origin of the path. Etienne (1980) provided one of the first experimental demonstrations of path integration by a vertebrate, and in this section Etienne et al. (1996) describe recent research with animals and humans on the interaction between path integration and landmark information. Path integration is also the fundamental means of navigation in the model described by Gallistel and Cramer (1996). McNaughton et al. (1996) suggest that the neural basis of path integration is found in the place cells and head direction cells of the hippocampus and associated brain regions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (11) ◽  
pp. 2824-2829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Hoinville ◽  
Rüdiger Wehner

In the last decades, desert ants have become model organisms for the study of insect navigation. In finding their way, they use two major navigational routines: path integration using a celestial compass and landmark guidance based on sets of panoramic views of the terrestrial environment. It has been claimed that this information would enable the insect to acquire and use a centralized cognitive map of its foraging terrain. Here, we present a decentralized architecture, in which the concurrently operating path integration and landmark guidance routines contribute optimally to the directions to be steered, with “optimal” meaning maximizing the certainty (reliability) of the combined information. At any one time during its journey, the animal computes a path integration (global) vector and landmark guidance (local) vector, in which the length of each vector is proportional to the certainty of the individual estimates. Hence, these vectors represent the limited knowledge that the navigator has at any one place about the direction of the goal. The sum of the global and local vectors indicates the navigator’s optimal directional estimate. Wherever applied, this decentralized model architecture is sufficient to simulate the results of quite a number of diverse cue-conflict experiments, which have recently been performed in various behavioral contexts by different authors in both desert ants and honeybees. They include even those experiments that have deliberately been designed by former authors to strengthen the evidence for a metric cognitive map in bees.


2020 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 101307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilde Bostelmann ◽  
Pierre Lavenex ◽  
Pamela Banta Lavenex

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravikrishnan P. Jayakumar ◽  
Manu S. Madhav ◽  
Francesco Savelli ◽  
Hugh T. Blair ◽  
Noah J. Cowan ◽  
...  

SummaryHippocampal place cells are spatially tuned neurons that serve as elements of a “cognitive map” in the mammalian brain1. To detect the animal’s location, place cells are thought to rely upon two interacting mechanisms: sensing the animal’s position relative to familiar landmarks2,3 and measuring the distance and direction that the animal has travelled from previously occupied locations4–7. The latter mechanism, known as path integration, requires a finely tuned gain factor that relates the animal’s self-movement to the updating of position on the internal cognitive map, with external landmarks necessary to correct positional error that eventually accumulates8,9. Path-integration-based models of hippocampal place cells and entorhinal grid cells treat the path integration gain as a constant9–14, but behavioral evidence in humans suggests that the gain is modifiable15. Here we show physiological evidence from hippocampal place cells that the path integration gain is indeed a highly plastic variable that can be altered by persistent conflict between self-motion cues and feedback from external landmarks. In a novel, augmented reality system, visual landmarks were moved in proportion to the animal’s movement on a circular track, creating continuous conflict with path integration. Sustained exposure to this cue conflict resulted in predictable and prolonged recalibration of the path integration gain, as estimated from the place cells after the landmarks were extinguished. We propose that this rapid plasticity keeps the positional update in register with the animal’s movement in the external world over behavioral timescales (mean 50 laps over 35 minutes). These results also demonstrate that visual landmarks not only provide a signal to correct cumulative error in the path integration system, as has been previously shown4,8,16–19, but also rapidly fine-tune the integration computation itself.


Author(s):  
Stanley Heinze

Navigation is the ability of animals to move through their environment in a planned manner. Different from directed but reflex-driven movements, it involves the comparison of the animal’s current heading with its intended heading (i.e., the goal direction). When the two angles don’t match, a compensatory steering movement must be initiated. This basic scenario can be described as an elementary navigational decision. Many elementary decisions chained together in specific ways form a coherent navigational strategy. With respect to navigational goals, there are four main forms of navigation: explorative navigation (exploring the environment for food, mates, shelter, etc.); homing (returning to a nest); straight-line orientation (getting away from a central place in a straight line); and long-distance migration (seasonal long-range movements to a location such as an overwintering place). The homing behavior of ants and bees has been examined in the most detail. These insects use several strategies to return to their nest after foraging, including path integration, route following, and, potentially, even exploit internal maps. Independent of the strategy used, insects can use global sensory information (e.g., skylight cues), local cues (e.g., visual panorama), and idiothetic (i.e., internal, self-generated) cues to obtain information about their current and intended headings. How are these processes controlled by the insect brain? While many unanswered questions remain, much progress has been made in recent years in understanding the neural basis of insect navigation. Neural pathways encoding polarized light information (a global navigational cue) target a brain region called the central complex, which is also involved in movement control and steering. Being thus placed at the interface of sensory information processing and motor control, this region has received much attention recently and emerged as the navigational “heart” of the insect brain. It houses an ordered array of head-direction cells that use a wide range of sensory information to encode the current heading of the animal. At the same time, it receives information about the movement speed of the animal and thus is suited to compute the home vector for path integration. With the help of neurons following highly stereotypical projection patterns, the central complex theoretically can perform the comparison of current and intended heading that underlies most navigation processes. Examining the detailed neural circuits responsible for head-direction coding, intended heading representation, and steering initiation in this brain area will likely lead to a solid understanding of the neural basis of insect navigation in the years to come.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document