Faculty Opinions recommendation of Artificial selection on relative brain size in the guppy reveals costs and benefits of evolving a larger brain.

Author(s):  
Gabriele Sorci
2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Kotrschal ◽  
Björn Rogell ◽  
Andreas Bundsen ◽  
Beatrice Svensson ◽  
Susanne Zajitschek ◽  
...  

Evolution ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 2942-2951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Kotrschal ◽  
Hong-Li Zeng ◽  
Wouter van der Bijl ◽  
Caroline Öhman-Mägi ◽  
Kurt Kotrschal ◽  
...  

Evolution ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 1139-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Kotrschal ◽  
Eva JP Lievens ◽  
Josefin Dahlbom ◽  
Andreas Bundsen ◽  
Svetlana Semenova ◽  
...  

Paleobiology ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard Radinsky

It is commonly believed that the brains of the ancestors of modern carnivores (miacids) were superior to (e.g., larger than) those of other early carnivores (creodonts and mesonychids). Examination of the fossil record of brains of early carnivores reveals no evidence to support that belief. Moreover, evolutionary trends towards increasing relative brain size and an expansion of neocortex are seen in both miacids and creodonts. The neocortex expanded in a different way in miacids than in creodonts and mesonychids (evidenced by different sulcal patterns), but the biological significance of the observed differences is unknown.


Evolution ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 740-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Eisenberg ◽  
Don E. Wilson

1982 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Este Armstrong

Author(s):  
Mateo Peñaherrera Aguirre ◽  
Heitor BarcellosFerreira Fernandes ◽  
Michael A Woodley of Menie

2019 ◽  
pp. 423-472
Author(s):  
Georg F. Striedter ◽  
R. Glenn Northcutt

After summarizing the earlier chapters, which focused on the evolution of specific lineages, this chapter examines general patterns in the evolution of vertebrate nervous systems. Most conspicuous is that relative brain size and complexity increased independently in many lineages. The proportional size of individual brain regions tends to change predictably with absolute brain size (and neurogenesis timing), but the scaling rules vary across lineages. Attempts to link variation in the size of individual brain areas (or entire brains) to behavior are complicated in part because the connections, internal organization, and functions of individual brain regions also vary across phylogeny. In addition, major changes in the functional organization of vertebrate brains were caused by the emergence of novel brain regions (e.g., neocortex in mammals and area dorsalis centralis in teleosts) and novel circuits. These innovations significantly modified the “vertebrate brain Bauplan,” but their mechanistic origins and implications require further investigation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-122
Author(s):  
Diego Ocampo ◽  
César Sánchez ◽  
Gilbert Barrantes

The ratio of brain size to body size (relative brain size) is often used as a measure of relative investment in the brain in ecological and evolutionary studies on a wide range of animal groups. In birds, a variety of methods have been used to measure the brain size part of this ratio, including endocranial volume, fixed brain mass, and fresh brain mass. It is still unclear, however, whether these methods yield the same results. Using data obtained from fresh corpses and from published sources, this study shows that endocranial volume, mass of fixed brain tissue, and fresh mass provide equivalent estimations of brain size for 48 bird families, in 19 orders. We found, however, that the various methods yield significantly different brain size estimates for hummingbirds (Trochilidae). For hummingbirds, fixed brain mass tends to underestimate brain size due to reduced tissue density, whereas endocranial volume overestimates brain size because it includes a larger volume than that occupied by the brain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document