Faculty Opinions recommendation of Long-term follow-up of the RTOG 9501/intergroup phase III trial: postoperative concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy in high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Author(s):  
Jacques Bernier
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17560-e17560
Author(s):  
William Barrett ◽  
Christine Cassidy

e17560 Background: There are approximately 436,000 survivors of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in the U.S. Toxicities related to definitive chemoradiation or radiation therapy can persist for many years, with some toxicities not presenting clinically until five or more years after definitive treatment. Long-term management of late radiotherapy effects is thus warranted. Methods: This retrospective chart review has three aims: (1) comprehensively assess overall late effects of definitive radiation and chemoradiation; (2) compare treatment-related toxicities between definitive radiation and chemoradiation; and (3) compare treatment-related toxicities between patients with TNM stage T1/T2 tumors to T3/T4 tumors. Late term effects were assessed using 17 toxicity categories including xerostomia, dysphagia, and neck fibrosis. HNSCC patients included in the study were those seen by a single practitioner for follow-up of definitive radiation or chemoradiation, without a history of surgical intervention to the primary site, between June 2017 and June 2018 (N = 49). Results: The median time from the end of treatment to the most recent follow-up was 8.53 years (1.17-24.08 years). In the total cohort, the most common late effect was xerostomia (78%, N = 38), followed by dysphagia (43%, N = 21), and neck fibrosis (27%, N = 13). For the majority of toxicity categories (11 of 17), the cohort that received definitive chemoradiation had higher rates of toxicity than the cohort that received definitive radiation alone. Additionally, for the majority of toxicity categories (10 of 17), the cohort of T3/T4 tumors had higher rates of long-term toxicity than the cohort of T1/T2 tumors. Conclusions: Although the patient population in this study has excellent locoregional control after definitive radiation or chemoradiation, the majority of patients suffer from long-term treatment-related toxicities. Long-term follow up care is needed to manage the late effects of radiotherapy that can develop and persist for years after treatment completion.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (13) ◽  
pp. 2092-2097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Elliott ◽  
James R. Wright ◽  
R. Suzanne Swann ◽  
Felix Nguyen-Tân ◽  
Cristiane Takita ◽  
...  

Purpose This multicentered phase III trial was designed to compare an emulsion containing trolamine against the usual supportive care within each participating institution for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy. Patients and Methods Patients with biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: prophylactic trolamine emulsion, interventional trolamine emulsion, or declared institutional preference. The primary outcome was the reduction in grade 2 or higher skin toxicity, as per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported quality of life (QOL). Results From October 2000 to April 2002, 547 patients from 51 institutions were entered onto the trial. The average age was 59 years. Patients were predominately male (79%) and most continued to use tobacco products (52%). The rates of grade 2 or higher radiation dermatitis were 79%, 77%, and 79% in the prophylactic, interventional, and institutional preference arms of the study, respectively. No significant differences in QOL were found. Conclusion The results of this trial demonstrate no advantage for the use of trolamine in reducing the incidence of grade 2 or higher radiation dermatitis or improving patient-reported QOL. The use of 15 different local standards of care highlights the need to continue research that will result in evidence-based recommendations to reduce the burden of radiation dermatitis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document