Faculty Opinions recommendation of Mitotic rounding alters cell geometry to ensure efficient bipolar spindle formation.

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Walczak
Keyword(s):  
Cell Geometry ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Bipolar Spindle

scholarly journals Mitotic Rounding Alters Cell Geometry to Ensure Efficient Bipolar Spindle Formation

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 270-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar M. Lancaster ◽  
Maël Le Berre ◽  
Andrea Dimitracopoulos ◽  
Daria Bonazzi ◽  
Ewa Zlotek-Zlotkiewicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Geometry ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Bipolar Spindle

scholarly journals Chromosomes initiate spindle assembly upon experimental dissolution of the nuclear envelope in grasshopper spermatocytes.

1995 ◽  
Vol 131 (5) ◽  
pp. 1125-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Zhang ◽  
R B Nicklas
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Essential Role ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Microtubule Assembly ◽  
Chromosomal Protein ◽  
Spindle Microtubule ◽  
Late Prophase ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Bipolar Spindle

Chromosomes are known to enhance spindle microtubule assembly in grasshopper spermatocytes, which suggested to us that chromosomes might play an essential role in the initiation of spindle formation. Chromosomes might, for example, activate other spindle components such as centrosomes and tubulin subunits upon the breakdown of the nuclear envelope. We tested this possibility in living grasshopper spermatocytes. We ruptured the nuclear envelope during prophase, which prematurely exposed the centrosomes to chromosomes and nuclear sap. Spindle assembly was promptly initiated. In contrast, assembly of the spindle was completely inhibited if the nucleus was mechanically removed from a late prophase cell. Other experiments showed that the trigger for spindle assembly is associated with the chromosomes; other constituents of the nucleus cannot initiate spindle assembly in the absence of the chromosomes. The initiation of spindle assembly required centrosomes as well as chromosomes. Extracting centrosomes from late prophase cells completely inhibited spindle assembly after dissolution of the nuclear envelope. We conclude that the normal formation of a bipolar spindle in grasshopper spermatocytes is regulated by chromosomes. A possible explanation is an activator, perhaps a chromosomal protein (Yeo, J.-P., F. Alderuccio, and B.-H. Toh. 1994a. Nature (Lond.). 367: 288-291), that promotes and stabilizes the assembly of astral microtubules and thus promotes assembly of the spindle.

scholarly journals Bimodal Interaction of Mammalian Polo-Like Kinase 1 and a Centrosomal Scaffold, Cep192, in the Regulation of Bipolar Spindle Formation

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (15) ◽  
pp. 2626-2640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingjun Meng ◽  
Jung-Eun Park ◽  
Tae-Sung Kim ◽  
Eun Hye Lee ◽  
Suk-Youl Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Cultured Human Cells ◽  
Bipolar Spindles

Serving as microtubule-organizing centers, centrosomes play a key role in forming bipolar spindles. The mechanism of how centrosomes promote bipolar spindle assembly in various organisms remains largely unknown. A recent study withXenopus laevisegg extracts suggested that the Plk1 ortholog Plx1 interacts with the phospho-T46 (p-T46) motif ofXenopusCep192 (xCep192) to form an xCep192-mediated xAurA-Plx1 cascade that is critical for bipolar spindle formation. Here, we demonstrated that in cultured human cells, Cep192 recruits AurA and Plk1 in a cooperative manner, and this event is important for the reciprocal activation of AurA and Plk1. Strikingly, Plk1 interacted with Cep192 through either the p-T44 (analogous toXenopusp-T46) or the newly identified p-S995 motif via its C-terminal noncatalytic polo-box domain. The interaction between Plk1 and the p-T44 motif was prevalent in the presence of Cep192-bound AurA, whereas the interaction of Plk1 with the p-T995 motif was preferred in the absence of AurA binding. Notably, the loss of p-T44- and p-S995-dependent Cep192-Plk1 interactions induced an additive defect in recruiting Plk1 and γ-tubulin to centrosomes, which ultimately led to a failure in proper bipolar spindle formation and mitotic progression. Thus, we propose that Plk1 promotes centrosome-based bipolar spindle formation by forming two functionally nonredundant complexes with Cep192.

scholarly journals The association of Plk1 with the astrin–kinastrin complex promotes formation and maintenance of a metaphase plate

2020 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. jcs251025
Author(s):  
Zoë Geraghty ◽  
Christina Barnard ◽  
Pelin Uluocak ◽  
Ulrike Gruneberg
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Mitotic Chromosomes ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Mitotic Kinase ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Chromosome Congression ◽  
Chromosome Alignment

ABSTRACTErrors in mitotic chromosome segregation can lead to DNA damage and aneuploidy, both hallmarks of cancer. To achieve synchronous error-free segregation, mitotic chromosomes must align at the metaphase plate with stable amphitelic attachments to microtubules emanating from opposing spindle poles. The astrin–kinastrin (astrin is also known as SPAG5 and kinastrin as SKAP) complex, also containing DYNLL1 and MYCBP, is a spindle and kinetochore protein complex with important roles in bipolar spindle formation, chromosome alignment and microtubule–kinetochore attachment. However, the molecular mechanisms by which astrin–kinastrin fulfils these diverse roles are not fully understood. Here, we characterise a direct interaction between astrin and the mitotic kinase Plk1. We identify the Plk1-binding site on astrin as well as four Plk1 phosphorylation sites on astrin. Regulation of astrin by Plk1 is dispensable for bipolar spindle formation and bulk chromosome congression, but promotes stable microtubule–kinetochore attachments and metaphase plate maintenance. It is known that Plk1 activity is required for effective microtubule–kinetochore attachment formation, and we suggest that astrin phosphorylation by Plk1 contributes to this process.

scholarly journals Interplay of Microtubule Dynamics and Sliding during Bipolar Spindle Formation in Mammalian Cells

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (24) ◽  
pp. 2108-2113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swapna Kollu ◽  
Samuel F. Bakhoum ◽  
Duane A. Compton
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Microtubule Dynamics ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Bipolar Spindle

scholarly journals csi2p modulates microtubule dynamics and organizes the bipolar spindle for chromosome segregation

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (24) ◽  
pp. 3900-3908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judite Costa ◽  
Chuanhai Fu ◽  
V. Mohini Khare ◽  
Phong T. Tran
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Microtubule Dynamics ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Eukaryotic Chromosome ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Multiple Phenotypes

Proper chromosome segregation is of paramount importance for proper genetic inheritance. Defects in chromosome segregation can lead to aneuploidy, which is a hallmark of cancer cells. Eukaryotic chromosome segregation is accomplished by the bipolar spindle. Additional mechanisms, such as the spindle assembly checkpoint and centromere positioning, further help to ensure complete segregation fidelity. Here we present the fission yeast csi2+. csi2p localizes to the spindle poles, where it regulates mitotic microtubule dynamics, bipolar spindle formation, and subsequent chromosome segregation. csi2 deletion (csi2Δ) results in abnormally long mitotic microtubules, high rate of transient monopolar spindles, and subsequent high rate of chromosome segregation defects. Because csi2Δ has multiple phenotypes, it enables estimates of the relative contribution of the different mechanisms to the overall chromosome segregation process. Centromere positioning, microtubule dynamics, and bipolar spindle formation can all contribute to chromosome segregation. However, the major determinant of chromosome segregation defects in fission yeast may be microtubule dynamic defects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document